Closed Bug 1121338 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago

[Loop] Audio/Video codec identification for Rooms

Categories

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Loop, defect)

ARM
Gonk (Firefox OS)
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: opatinobugzilla, Assigned: opatinobugzilla)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

61 bytes, text/x-github-pull-request
jaoo
: review+
jaoo
: feedback+
Details | Review
Right now AV codec identification is implemented for conversations but not for Rooms. We are going to identify the A&V codec used for a Room's session.
Assignee: nobody → opatinobugzilla
OS: Windows 7 → Gonk (Firefox OS)
Hardware: x86_64 → ARM
Attached file proposed patch
Attachment #8551366 - Flags: review?(josea.olivera)
Attachment #8551366 - Flags: review?(carmen.jimenezcabezas)
Comment on attachment 8551366 [details] [review] proposed patch Left a few comments on the PR. Please address them and request review at me once you are done. Thanks Oscar!.
Attachment #8551366 - Flags: review?(josea.olivera)
Comment on attachment 8551366 [details] [review] proposed patch I think one reviewer is enough. I have only one question. don't we want differentiate between the count for codeVideo used in the room and in the call? If this is the point, we should use different count variables names
Flags: needinfo?(opatinobugzilla)
Attachment #8551366 - Flags: review?(carmen.jimenezcabezas)
It's better to know the codec used for the communication than the communication type( conversation room).
Flags: needinfo?(opatinobugzilla)
Attachment #8551366 - Flags: review?(josea.olivera)
Comment on attachment 8551366 [details] [review] proposed patch Left some comments on the pull request. Please, have a look at them and request review at me again once you address all of them. Thanks!
Attachment #8551366 - Flags: review?(josea.olivera)
Attachment #8551366 - Flags: review?(josea.olivera)
Comment on attachment 8551366 [details] [review] proposed patch Left some comments on the pull request. Please, have a look at them and request review at me again once you address all of them. Thanks!
Attachment #8551366 - Flags: review?(josea.olivera)
Attachment #8551366 - Flags: review?(josea.olivera)
Comment on attachment 8551366 [details] [review] proposed patch This is looking great. I'd like you to address the comments I made in the pull request before r+'ing this patch. Please, request review at me again once you address all of them.
Attachment #8551366 - Flags: review?(josea.olivera) → feedback+
Attachment #8551366 - Flags: review?(josea.olivera)
Comment on attachment 8551366 [details] [review] proposed patch LGTM, r=me with comments addressed. Please address them and land at will. Thanks Oscar!
Attachment #8551366 - Flags: review?(josea.olivera) → review+
Depends on: 1127789
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: