Closed
Bug 1121338
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
[Loop] Audio/Video codec identification for Rooms
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Loop, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: opatinobugzilla, Assigned: opatinobugzilla)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
Right now AV codec identification is implemented for conversations but not for Rooms. We are going to identify the A&V codec used for a Room's session.
| Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → opatinobugzilla
| Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
OS: Windows 7 → Gonk (Firefox OS)
Hardware: x86_64 → ARM
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8551366 -
Flags: review?(josea.olivera)
Attachment #8551366 -
Flags: review?(carmen.jimenezcabezas)
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8551366 [details] [review]
proposed patch
Left a few comments on the PR. Please address them and request review at me once you are done. Thanks Oscar!.
Attachment #8551366 -
Flags: review?(josea.olivera)
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8551366 [details] [review]
proposed patch
I think one reviewer is enough.
I have only one question. don't we want differentiate between the count for codeVideo used in the room and in the call? If this is the point, we should use different count variables names
Flags: needinfo?(opatinobugzilla)
Attachment #8551366 -
Flags: review?(carmen.jimenezcabezas)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
It's better to know the codec used for the communication than the communication type( conversation room).
Flags: needinfo?(opatinobugzilla)
| Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8551366 -
Flags: review?(josea.olivera)
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8551366 [details] [review]
proposed patch
Left some comments on the pull request. Please, have a look at them and request review at me again once you address all of them. Thanks!
Attachment #8551366 -
Flags: review?(josea.olivera)
| Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8551366 -
Flags: review?(josea.olivera)
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8551366 [details] [review]
proposed patch
Left some comments on the pull request. Please, have a look at them and request review at me again once you address all of them. Thanks!
Attachment #8551366 -
Flags: review?(josea.olivera)
| Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8551366 -
Flags: review?(josea.olivera)
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8551366 [details] [review]
proposed patch
This is looking great. I'd like you to address the comments I made in the pull request before r+'ing this patch. Please, request review at me again once you address all of them.
Attachment #8551366 -
Flags: review?(josea.olivera) → feedback+
| Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8551366 -
Flags: review?(josea.olivera)
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8551366 [details] [review]
proposed patch
LGTM, r=me with comments addressed. Please address them and land at will. Thanks Oscar!
Attachment #8551366 -
Flags: review?(josea.olivera) → review+
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
Landed: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/firefoxos-loop-client/commit/5fd94e5bde862f358b32a932a147e51ce30a8858
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•