Closed Bug 1122297 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago

Adjust existing Mac OS X reftest failure annotations that also show up on 10.10

Categories

(Testing :: Reftest, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla38

People

(Reporter: dbaron, Assigned: dbaron)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

This adjusts existing reftest annotations for tests that fail on 10.8
(or, in one case, 10.9) that are showing up as failing on 10.10 as well
to be marked using >= version tests rather than == version tests.
Comment on attachment 8549941 [details] [diff] [review]
Adjust existing Mac OS X reftest failure annotations that also show up on 10.10

>-fuzzy-if(winWidget,102,580) fuzzy-if(d2d,143,681) fuzzy-if(OSX==1008,224,924) fuzzy-if(OSX==1009,224,924) == scale3d-all.html scale3d-1-ref.html # subpixel AA
>-fuzzy-if(winWidget,102,580) fuzzy-if(d2d,143,681) fuzzy-if(OSX==1008,224,924) fuzzy-if(OSX==1009,224,924) == scale3d-all-separate.html scale3d-1-ref.html # subpixel AA
>+fuzzy-if(winWidget,102,580) fuzzy-if(d2d,143,681) fuzzy-if(OSX==1008,224,924) fuzzy-if(OSX>=1009,224,924) == scale3d-all.html scale3d-1-ref.html # subpixel AA
>+fuzzy-if(winWidget,102,580) fuzzy-if(d2d,143,681) fuzzy-if(OSX==1008,224,924) fuzzy-if(OSX>=1009,224,924) == scale3d-all-separate.html scale3d-1-ref.html # subpixel AA

Don't we just want >=1008, since it's the same fuzz?
Attachment #8549941 - Flags: review?(philringnalda) → review+
Oops, I thought it was different, but I must have been looking at the D2D line..
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/ecb5b1d90b11
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla38
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: