Bad kerning for a particular PDF document
Categories
(Firefox :: PDF Viewer, defect, P2)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: aros, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
(Whiteboard: [pdfjs-rendering][pdfjs-image-quality][pdfjs-hwa-off])
Attachments
(8 files)
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 7•3 years ago
|
||
The PDF is correctly rendered in latest Nightly 96.0a1 under Win 7 x86 and Win 10 x64, HVA on/off, thus closing as RWFM.
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•3 years ago
|
||
Can't confirm.
Reporter | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•3 years ago
|
||
Probably I have an unusual fonts.conf configuration, attaching it.
My distro is Fedora 35.
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•3 years ago
|
||
If Firefox is a Windows-only web browser you can go ahead and leave the bug report closed.
Comment 11•3 years ago
•
|
||
Looks good for me on Firefox 93 and latest Nightly 96.0a1 using Ubuntu 21.04 Wayland (I don't have access to Fedora), so I'm lowering the severity to S3.
Updated•3 years ago
|
Updated•3 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 12•3 years ago
|
||
This is still not fixed 8 years after I filed the bug report.
Reporter | ||
Comment 13•3 years ago
|
||
Another PDF document with a complete botched rendering.
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•3 years ago
|
||
Video_quality_evaluation_and_testing_verification_.pdf in Firefox 102.0.1
Reporter | ||
Comment 15•3 years ago
|
||
Video_quality_evaluation_and_testing_verification_.pdf in Google Chrome Version 103.0.5060.114 (Official Build) (64-bit)
Comment 16•3 years ago
|
||
This is still not fixed 8 years after I filed the bug report.
As mentioned here: https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js/issues/2739#issuecomment-450633930, some fonts are not embedded in the pdf.
For example "Table of contents" on page 2 should be rendered in using Trebuchet MS
but it isn't embedded, hence when drawing, the font in the canvas is set to TrebuchetMS, sans-serif
and finally it depends on the fonts you've on your system.
So we can likely improve the way to find an alternative font (it's on our roadmap) but we aren't magicians: there are absolutely no way to guess how the glyphs look like just in using a font name.
Updated•2 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 18•2 years ago
|
||
I can confirm it's fixed in today's nightly.
Cannot comment on the parent bug unfortunately.
Description
•