Closed Bug 1130921 Opened 10 years ago Closed 7 years ago

[Rocketbar] Screen orientation behavior of search app depends on the most recent app

Categories

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Search, defect)

ARM
Gonk (Firefox OS)
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED WONTFIX

People

(Reporter: hcheng, Unassigned)

Details

(Whiteboard: [systemsfe])

*Description When I enter search app from an app which have screen orientation enabled, search app can orientate its screen. To the contrary, the screen orientation of search app will be locked. UX spec does not define landscape mode, so it suppose be portrait-only. *STR: 1. Open browser 2. tap navigation bar to enter search app 3. rotate the phone *Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSfTLu7dIC8 *Env Build ID 20150208002500 Gaia Revision e827781324cbde91d2434b388f5dead3303a85ee Gaia Date 2015-02-06 20:54:14 Gecko Revision https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g37_v2_2/rev/0552759956d3 Gecko Version 37.0a2 Device Name flame Firmware(Release) 4.4.2 Firmware(Incremental) eng.cltbld.20150208.035623 Firmware Date Sun Feb 8 03:56:34 EST 2015 Bootloader L1TC000118D0
blocking-b2g: --- → 2.2?
Flags: needinfo?(fdjabri)
OS: Linux → Gonk (Firefox OS)
Hardware: x86_64 → ARM
Whiteboard: [systemsfe]
That's not a regression. It looks broken and we are still fixing it as part of the search feature.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
(In reply to Gregor Wagner [:gwagner] from comment #1) > That's not a regression. It looks broken and we are still fixing it as part > of the search feature. Hi Gregor, which bug will include the patch for this bug?
Flags: needinfo?(fdjabri) → needinfo?(anygregor)
(In reply to Hermes Cheng[:hermescheng] from comment #2) > (In reply to Gregor Wagner [:gwagner] from comment #1) > > That's not a regression. It looks broken and we are still fixing it as part > > of the search feature. > > Hi Gregor, which bug will include the patch for this bug? Dale, you mentioned this today.
Flags: needinfo?(anygregor) → needinfo?(dale)
Sorry I think there was some confusion on the call, I was just trying to ask about the process for landing things on 2.2 (whether they need approval / feature 2.2+ was enough). I dont know about this bug, but can take a look
Flags: needinfo?(dale)
This was impossible before as we did not have the necessary platform support. Since the search window is now opaque over content once we show suggestions, it may be possible to implement without platform support. I do think we shipped 2.1 with this, so I don't think it should be a blocker. Though we should fix the current layout problems.
(In reply to Kevin Grandon :kgrandon from comment #5) > This was impossible before as we did not have the necessary platform > support. Since the search window is now opaque over content once we show > suggestions, it may be possible to implement without platform support. > > I do think we shipped 2.1 with this, so I don't think it should be a > blocker. Though we should fix the current layout problems. So, this bug is a valid one, right? Please change the status if I am incorrect.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: INVALID → ---
Not blocking since its also present in 2.1
blocking-b2g: 2.2? → ---
Firefox OS is not being worked on
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago7 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.