Closed Bug 1131410 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago

Extract Sync's log management so it can be reused by the Reading List back-end

Categories

(Cloud Services :: Firefox: Common, defect)

defect
Not set
normal
Points:
3

Tracking

(firefox38 fixed, firefox39 fixed)

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla39
Iteration:
39.1 - 9 Mar
Tracking Status
firefox38 --- fixed
firefox39 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: markh, Assigned: markh)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

Attachments

(2 files, 1 obsolete file)

The sync logs are vital for diagnosing Sync related issues, so we should ensure reading-list has the same capability. We should just rip the sync code out where it can be reused in this context, and reuse about:sync-log
Flags: qe-verify-
Flags: firefox-backlog+
Blocks: 1131416
Assignee: nobody → mhammond
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Iteration: --- → 38.3 - 23 Feb
Blocks: 1132074
As described on the packet!
Attachment #8563247 - Flags: feedback?(rnewman)
Attachment #8563247 - Flags: feedback?(adw)
Comment on attachment 8563247 [details] [diff] [review] 0001-Bug-1131410-Extract-sync-s-log-management-so-it-can-.patch Review of attachment 8563247 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Seems OK to me! If I were writing a logging system from scratch and had the requirement of being able to aggregate multiple logs together, I'd probably try to avoid creating a special LogManager type and would instead try to make one Log be able to pipe its messages to any other. Then when I needed to aggregate many logs into one, I'd make a new Log and pipe all my other logs into it. ::: services/common/logmanager.js @@ +1,1 @@ > +/* This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public This filename doesn't follow desktop JSM naming conventions, but I recognize that this is in services/. @@ +29,5 @@ > +// both Sync and Reading-list. > +// However, different instances have different pref branches, so we need to > +// handle when one pref branch says "Debug" and the other says "Error" > +// So we (a) keep singleton console and dump appenders and (b) keep track > +// of the minimum (ie, most verbose) level and use that. Makes sense I think! @@ +112,5 @@ > + log.addAppender(appender); > + } > + } > + // and use the first specified log as *our* log. > + // XXX - is this OK? Along the lines of what I said above, my first thought would be to create a new log for the manager and route the messages of all the corresponding "sub-logs" through it. Just my first thought, and without knowing really much at all about Sync logging.
Attachment #8563247 - Flags: feedback?(adw) → feedback+
(In reply to Drew Willcoxon :adw from comment #2) > Along the lines of what I said above, my first thought would be to create a > new log for the manager and route the messages of all the corresponding > "sub-logs" through it. Just my first thought, and without knowing really > much at all about Sync logging. Sync logging isn't special - it's really just Log.jsm semantics here. I'm not really clear what you mean though. The Log.jsm model is that a single log can have many "appenders" - it's expected that a single log can route messages to multiple places. It also has the concept of a log hierarchy, but that's based on log names, and we don't want to constrain the log names available to be used. So, what we *could* do is have our own custom appender and add that to each of the logs. This appender could collect stuff from the individual logs and "pipe" it to a new log we've created, but the main drawback is that this would lose the log name from the output - or we'd also need a custom formatter etc - and I think that would *still* leave us with the same basic problems (ie, there's exactly 1 "dump" device, and having multiple dump appenders sourcing stuff from the same log will end up with messages logged multiple times. IMO the DumpAppender should be a singleton in Log.jsm) Another solution would be to dictate the log name used by, eg, FxAccounts. Then we could have completely different logs from FxA when used in a Sync context, and another log when used in a RL context. However, FxA is effectively a singleton - the exact same instance is used by both (and, eg, it listens to observer notifications and takes actions for *all* consumers) - the FxA user state is global, not per service - so this doesn't work either. So unless I misunderstand your suggestion, I can only agree it somewhat sucks but can't see a better answer.
Attachment #8563247 - Flags: feedback?(bmcbride)
Comment on attachment 8563247 [details] [diff] [review] 0001-Bug-1131410-Extract-sync-s-log-management-so-it-can-.patch Review of attachment 8563247 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Discussed on IRC. Basically: * Yep, that'll do. * Drew's grouping idea good, but IMO not worth it here (ie, do in Log.jsm eventually). * Main-thread I/O bad.
Attachment #8563247 - Flags: feedback?(bmcbride) → feedback+
This version has no main-thread IO \o/. That did require some changes to the existing tests as they assumed the log writing happened quickly enough whereas now it's quite a bit slower than before (which is just the price we pay for passing all the data to the worker thread and having the IO happen there). I think it's ready for review, but another sanity check can't hurt.
Attachment #8565838 - Flags: feedback?(rnewman)
Attachment #8565838 - Flags: feedback?(adw)
Attachment #8565838 - Flags: feedback?(adw) → feedback+
Attachment #8563247 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8563247 - Flags: feedback?(rnewman)
Comment on attachment 8565838 [details] [diff] [review] 0001-Bug-1131410-Extract-sync-s-log-management-so-it-can-.patch I might as well request review now while still waiting for rnewman's feedback. This bug needs to land before the reading list "scheduler" and before the browser UI changes, so (assuming r+) I'll go ahead and land this before rnewman's feedback if necessary (but I'll put off landing until I really need to land those other bugs)
Attachment #8565838 - Flags: review?(adw)
Sorry for the delay; each time I've come back to this patch, it's required more brain than I've had available! (Long week.)
Comment on attachment 8565838 [details] [diff] [review] 0001-Bug-1131410-Extract-sync-s-log-management-so-it-can-.patch Review of attachment 8565838 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- As you know I'm not very familiar with Log.jsm so I feel my comments are pretty superficial. Am I even allowed to r+ stuff in services/? :-) Richard's feedback even after this lands would be great. ::: services/common/logmanager.js @@ +13,5 @@ > + 'resource://gre/modules/FileUtils.jsm'); > +XPCOMUtils.defineLazyModuleGetter(this, 'Log', > + 'resource://gre/modules/Log.jsm'); > +XPCOMUtils.defineLazyModuleGetter(this, 'Task', > + 'resource://gre/modules/Task.jsm'); Again, it doesn't make sense to lazy-load Task.jsm since it'll be immediately imported when the file is loaded since you're using Task.async to define methods. @@ +39,5 @@ > + > +// Singletons used by each instance. > +let formatter; > +let dumpAppender; > +let consoleAppender; Nit: My same G prefixes nit from the other bug. @@ +169,5 @@ > + binaryStream.close(); > + yield output.close(); > + } > + this._log.trace("finished copy to", outputFile.path); > + return (yield OS.File.stat(outputFile.path)).lastModificationDate; Is the extra I/O of statting the file really worth it? It looks like you're just logging the date, and returning new Date() would work just as well. How often do you expect _copyStreamToFile to be called? @@ +179,5 @@ > + * Returns a promise that resolves on completion or rejects if the file could > + * not be written. > + */ > + resetFileLog(reason) { > + return new Promise((resolve, reject) => { This whole method would be nicer to read and write if it were: resetFileLog: Task.async(... right? @@ +234,5 @@ > + resolve(); > + } > + ); > + } else { > + resolve(); An early return in this case would make this easier to read, too. ::: services/common/tests/unit/test_logmanager.js @@ +22,5 @@ > + return [capps[0], dapps[0], fapps]; > +} > + > +// Test that the correct thing happens when no prefs exist for the log manager. > +add_test(function test_noPrefs() { Why no add_task for all of these? IIRC you can pass non-generator functions to add_task and it'll work. @@ +42,5 @@ > +// Test that changes to the prefs used by the log manager are updated dynamically. > +add_test(function test_PrefChanges() { > + Services.prefs.setCharPref("log-manager.test.log.appender.console", "Trace"); > + Services.prefs.setCharPref("log-manager.test.log.appender.dump", "Trace"); > + Services.prefs.setCharPref("log-manager.test.log.appender.file.level", "Trace"); IMO all these prefs should be removed when the test ends. You could define a setPref helper that calls do_register_cleanup at the same time.
Attachment #8565838 - Flags: review?(adw) → review+
(In reply to Drew Willcoxon :adw from comment #8) > Richard's feedback even after this lands would be great. Agreed - let's give him 1 more day ;) > Again, it doesn't make sense to lazy-load Task.jsm since it'll be > immediately imported when the file is loaded since you're using Task.async > to define methods. Fixed. > @@ +39,5 @@ > > + > > +// Singletons used by each instance. > > +let formatter; > > +let dumpAppender; > > +let consoleAppender; > > Nit: My same G prefixes nit from the other bug. I hate the prefixes too and don't really think they would make this module easier to understand, so I skipped this. > Is the extra I/O of statting the file really worth it? I think you're correct - I removed this. > resetFileLog: Task.async(... > > right? Yep, done. > Why no add_task for all of these? IIRC you can pass non-generator functions > to add_task and it'll work. Sure, why not! :) > IMO all these prefs should be removed when the test ends. You could define > a setPref helper that calls do_register_cleanup at the same time. I didn't do this as xpcshell never shares a profile with another test, and in a recent patch Gavin asked me to remove such a cleanup for this reason when reviewing a patch :) Carrying Drew's r+ forward but requesting it from rnewman, but I'll land without that if he's too busy to get to this.
Attachment #8567789 - Flags: review?(rnewman)
Iteration: 38.3 - 23 Feb → 39.1 - 9 Mar
ack - I pushed an earlier version of this patch. I'll push a followup soon.
Keywords: leave-open
Comment on attachment 8567789 [details] [diff] [review] 0001-Bug-1131410-Extract-sync-s-log-management-so-it-can-.patch Review of attachment 8567789 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Using "sync-error-" will cause new errors to be hidden underneath old ones in about:sync-log (descending sort), right? It also breaks the error/success categorization. I think we want all error logs to be together, not all sync logs. Consider error-sync-, success-sync- instead. If about:sync-logs and success and failure log capture work with this change, rock on. ::: services/common/logmanager.js @@ +1,4 @@ > +/* This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public > + * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this > + * file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. */ > + Nit: if this is new code, use strict. @@ +5,5 @@ > +const {classes: Cc, interfaces: Ci, utils: Cu, results: Cr} = Components; > + > +Cu.import("resource://gre/modules/XPCOMUtils.jsm"); > +XPCOMUtils.defineLazyModuleGetter(this, 'Services', > + 'resource://gre/modules/Services.jsm'); Nit: double quotes. @@ +7,5 @@ > +Cu.import("resource://gre/modules/XPCOMUtils.jsm"); > +XPCOMUtils.defineLazyModuleGetter(this, 'Services', > + 'resource://gre/modules/Services.jsm'); > +XPCOMUtils.defineLazyModuleGetter(this, 'Preferences', > + 'resource://gre/modules/Preferences.jsm'); There's no value in this being lazy, is there? Is anyone going to import this module without constructing a LogManager? @@ +26,5 @@ > +const DEFAULT_MAX_ERROR_AGE = 20 * 24 * 60 * 60; // 20 days > + > +// "shared" logs (ie, where the same log name is used by multiple LogManager > +// instances) are a fact of life here - eg, FirefoxAccounts logs are used by > +// both Sync and Reading-list. Nit: Reading List. Make life easier on greppers :) @@ +101,5 @@ > + this._observeDumpPref = setupAppender(dumpAppender, "log.appender.dump", Log.Level.Error, true); > + > + // The file appender doesn't get the special singleton behaviour. > + let fapp = this._fileAppender = new Log.StorageStreamAppender(formatter); > + // the stream gets a default of Debug as the user must go out of there way s/there/their @@ +168,5 @@ > + yield output.write(new Uint8Array(chunk)); > + } > + } finally { > + inputStream.close(); > + binaryStream.close(); If I'm reading nsBinaryStream.cpp correctly, closing the BIS will close its inner stream for you, just as Java's streams do. Consider wrapping this in an exception handler?
Attachment #8567789 - Flags: review?(rnewman) → review+
Component: Sync → Firefox: Common
Product: Firefox → Mozilla Services
Summary: Extract sync's log management so it can be reused by the reading-list back-end → Extract Sync's log management so it can be reused by the Reading List back-end
(In reply to Mark Hammond [:markh] from comment #9) > > Nit: My same G prefixes nit from the other bug. > > I hate the prefixes too and don't really think they would make this module > easier to understand, so I skipped this. FWIW, current style (definitely for this module, and as I understand for all new code and most other code, too): no aFoo, gBar.
Keywords: leave-open
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla39
Depends on: 1152140
No longer depends on: 1152140
Attachment #8565838 - Flags: feedback?(rnewman)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: