Closed
Bug 1133783
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Add a feature flag which for running workers in privileged mode
Categories
(Taskcluster :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: mrrrgn, Assigned: garndt)
References
Details
We need the ability update images within a TC worker, but, to use docker within a container, it must be run with `-privileged`: https://blog.docker.com/tag/inception/
The task config should support a flag which enables this mode.
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
Putting a feature flag at:
task.payload.features.privileged
Makes a lot of sense to me. But I suggest that we require a scope, whenever this feature flag is set.
Probably something like:
`docker-worker:privileged:<provisionerId>/<workerType>`
(ie. a scope-pattern covering this must be in task.scopes)
Ideally, we should isolate task that needs -privileged to a specific workerType. But if we don't,
it's certainly nice that there is a scope protecting the feature flag.
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
I am not against feature specific scopes but once we allow privileged you basically have complete access to the machine and it is not a good idea to use it for anything other then your one task... Potentially we should destroy the machines used in privileged mode after usage (particularly if the use case is building docker images).
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
If the use case is building docker images, then yes, we should cleanup by killing the worker node.
But, it should be noted that there are other valid use cases for privileged. Such as access to special hardware like GPUs.
And in some ways it really just signifies an increased level of trust.
Updated•9 years ago
|
Component: TaskCluster → General
Product: Testing → Taskcluster
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
privileged flag is available for docker-worker as of:
https://github.com/taskcluster/docker-worker/commit/f6a9cad669dadbc1f8034abaf927d178fc8ecd31#diff-af02ac312a10ad7d038707b65a14a7ab
This must be both enabled on the worker level as well as within a task.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•9 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → garndt
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•