Closed
Bug 1134307
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
Intermittent browser_bug592641.js | uncaught exception - Error: operation not possible on dead CPOW at :0
Categories
(Firefox :: General, defect, P5)
Firefox
General
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Firefox 51
People
(Reporter: RyanVM, Assigned: kevchan85, Mentored)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Keywords: intermittent-failure)
Attachments
(1 file, 4 obsolete files)
1.66 KB,
patch
|
mconley
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
The dead CPOW error doesn't look good.
09:21:13 INFO - 66 INFO TEST-START | dom/html/test/browser_bug592641.js
09:21:15 INFO - JavaScript error: , line 0: Error: operation not possible on dead CPOW
09:21:15 INFO - 67 INFO checking window state
09:21:15 INFO - 68 INFO Console message: [JavaScript Warning: "unsafe CPOW usage" {file: "resource:///modules/sessionstore/TabState.jsm" line: 96}]
09:21:15 INFO - 69 INFO Console message: [JavaScript Warning: "unsafe CPOW usage" {file: "resource:///modules/sessionstore/TabState.jsm" line: 96}]
09:21:15 INFO - 70 INFO TEST-PASS | dom/html/test/browser_bug592641.js | Title should be correct on load #1
09:21:15 INFO - 71 INFO Console message: [JavaScript Warning: "unsafe CPOW usage" {file: "chrome://mochitests/content/browser/dom/html/test/browser_bug592641.js" line: 33}]
09:21:15 INFO - 72 INFO Console message: [JavaScript Warning: "unsafe CPOW usage" {file: "chrome://mochitests/content/browser/dom/html/test/browser_bug592641.js" line: 33}]
09:21:15 INFO - 73 INFO TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | dom/html/test/browser_bug592641.js | uncaught exception - uncaught exception: undefined at :0
09:21:15 INFO - Stack trace:
09:21:15 INFO - chrome://mochikit/content/tests/SimpleTest/SimpleTest.js:simpletestOnerror:1476
09:21:15 INFO - null:null:0
09:21:15 INFO - JavaScript error: , line 0: uncaught exception: undefined
09:21:15 INFO - 74 INFO Console message: [JavaScript Warning: "unsafe CPOW usage" {file: "chrome://mochitests/content/browser/dom/html/test/browser_bug592641.js" line: 52}]
09:21:15 INFO - 75 INFO Console message: [JavaScript Error: "uncaught exception: undefined"]
09:21:15 INFO - 76 INFO Console message: [JavaScript Error: "Error: operation not possible on dead CPOW"]
09:21:54 INFO - 77 INFO Console message: 1424280114489 Toolkit.GMP WARN GMPInstallManager.parseResponseXML got node name: html, expected: updates
09:21:54 INFO - 78 INFO Console message: [JavaScript Error: "1424280114491 Toolkit.GMP ERROR GMPInstallManager.simpleCheckAndInstall Could not check for addons: {"target":{},"message":"got node name: html, expected: updates"}" {file: "resource://gre/modules/Log.jsm" line: 749}]
09:21:54 INFO - 79 INFO Console message: 1424280114711 Services.HealthReport.HealthReporter WARN Saved state file does not exist.
09:22:43 INFO - Xlib: extension "RANDR" missing on display ":0".
09:22:44 INFO - TEST-INFO | screentopng: exit 0
09:22:44 INFO - 80 INFO TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | dom/html/test/browser_bug592641.js | Test timed out - expected PASS
09:22:44 INFO - 81 INFO MEMORY STAT vsize after test: 21991423696896
09:22:44 INFO - 82 INFO MEMORY STAT residentFast after test: 494071808
09:22:44 INFO - 83 INFO TEST-OK | dom/html/test/browser_bug592641.js | took 90129ms
09:22:44 INFO - 84 INFO TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | dom/html/test/browser_bug592641.js | Found a tab after previous test timed out: http://mochi.test:8888/browser/dom/html/test/bug592641_img.jpg - expected PASS
09:22:44 INFO - 85 INFO TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | dom/html/test/browser_bug592641.js | Found a tab after previous test timed out: http://mochi.test:8888/browser/dom/html/test/bug592641_img.jpg - expected PASS
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Reporter | ||
Comment 17•10 years ago
|
||
Not really sure as to the best component for this, but Core::IPC probably isn't.
Updated•10 years ago
|
Blocks: e10s-tests
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Updated•9 years ago
|
Summary: Intermittent browser_bug592641.js | uncaught exception - uncaught exception: undefined at :0 → Intermittent browser_bug592641.js | uncaught exception - Error: operation not possible on dead CPOW at :0
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Reporter | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
status-firefox47:
--- → wontfix
status-firefox48:
--- → wontfix
status-firefox49:
--- → affected
status-firefox50:
--- → affected
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 78•8 years ago
|
||
Hey kevin!
So the good news is that we get stack information for dead CPOW exceptions, which really helps to narrow down where the problem is. (This is true as of about ~20 days ago since bug 1249698 landed).
Clicking on the "brasstacks" link from one of the OrangeFactor comments, I was able to find the test log, which has this in it:
01:45:14 INFO - 255 INFO TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | dom/html/test/browser_bug592641.js | uncaught exception - Error: operation not possible on dead CPOW at load2Done@chrome://mochitests/content/browser/dom/html/test/browser_bug592641.js:52:7
01:45:14 INFO - testScope/test_executeSoon/<.run@chrome://mochikit/content/browser-test.js:993:9
01:45:14 INFO - Stack trace:
01:45:14 INFO - chrome://mochikit/content/tests/SimpleTest/SimpleTest.js:simpletestOnerror:1609
01:45:14 INFO - JavaScript error: chrome://mochitests/content/browser/dom/html/test/browser_bug592641.js, line 52: Error: operation not possible on dead CPOW
01:45:14 INFO - 256 INFO Console message: [JavaScript Error: "Error: operation not possible on dead CPOW" {file: "chrome://mochitests/content/browser/dom/html/test/browser_bug592641.js" line: 52}]
01:45:14 INFO - load2Done@chrome://mochitests/content/browser/dom/html/test/browser_bug592641.js:52:7
01:45:14 INFO - testScope/test_executeSoon/<.run@chrome://mochikit/content/browser-test.js:993:9
So the problem appears to be in dom/html/test/browser_bug592641.js on line 52:
http://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/f80822840bc5f3d2d3cae3ece621ddbce72e7f54/dom/html/test/browser_bug592641.js#52
And what we've got here is a test attempting to access the title of a loaded page by way of the contentWindow CPOW. It should instead ask the tab2Browser object directly, via
ctx.tab2Browser.contentTitle
Can you make that change and make sure the test passes? If so, we can push this one to try. After that, if you're starting to get the hang of it, maybe you can go on a spree and start taking care of some of the rest of the (many) dead CPOW exceptions[1]: I know our tree sheriffs would be pretty happy about that!
[1]: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=dead%20CPOW&list_id=13186804
Assignee: nobody → kevchan85
Mentor: mconley
Reporter | ||
Comment 79•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mike Conley (:mconley) - (Needinfo me!) from comment #78)
> And what we've got here is a test attempting to access the title of a loaded
> page by way of the contentWindow CPOW. It should instead ask the tab2Browser
> object directly, via
>
> ctx.tab2Browser.contentTitle
Can't help but wonder if this pattern is frequent enough that a mass find & replace would be in order. And yes, ++ to fixing dead CPOW failures!
Comment 80•8 years ago
|
||
Not too many hits:
https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?q=contentWindow.document.title&=mozilla-central
But this did point out that there's a _2nd_ usage within this file that should probably be updated as well.
Assignee | ||
Comment 81•8 years ago
|
||
I finished this one. I have the other line in another file.
Attachment #8785358 -
Flags: review?(mconley)
Assignee | ||
Comment 82•8 years ago
|
||
Mike, I have the other bug ready to upload Should I create a new bug and post it there? I cannot find anything referencing this file from a quick search beside this thread.
Flags: needinfo?(mconley)
Assignee | ||
Comment 83•8 years ago
|
||
This patch has changes to lines referencing contentTitle for tabs 1 and two.
Attachment #8785375 -
Flags: review?(mconley)
Assignee | ||
Comment 84•8 years ago
|
||
This file has a change to line 33
Comment 85•8 years ago
|
||
I think fixing both of these CPOW uses in browser_bug592641.js in this bug makes sense. However, I think we can probably safely have the changes occur in the same file. Can you please combine your patches?
Updated•8 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(mconley) → needinfo?(kevchan85)
Assignee | ||
Comment 86•8 years ago
|
||
Here the file with both patches. I will start looking at other CPOW stuff as you suggested.
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8785358 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8785358 -
Flags: review?(mconley)
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8785375 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8785375 -
Flags: review?(mconley)
Assignee | ||
Comment 87•8 years ago
|
||
Thank you for removing the other patches I was trying to figure out how to do it on this thread.
Assignee | ||
Comment 88•8 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8785376 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8785381 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8785384 -
Flags: review?(mconley)
Comment 89•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8785384 [details] [diff] [review]
bug1134307_Dead_CPOW.diff
Review of attachment 8785384 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This looks great to me! I'm going to push this to try.
In the meantime, take a look at the list of bugs and feel free to needinfo? me on any that you want. I'll assign you and help you where you need.
Thanks for your work!
Attachment #8785384 -
Flags: review?(mconley) → review+
Comment hidden (obsolete) |
Updated•8 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(mconley)
Assignee | ||
Comment 91•8 years ago
|
||
Mike what are the flags for? I was watching the testing it says its done. Is there anything else I can do?
Comment 92•8 years ago
|
||
Hrm, not sure why the more recent push wasn't put in the bug. The one in comment 90 was obsolete (I forgot to request retriggers).
So here's the right one: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=cc09e297fff69d67caa4853909b9aa91bfc09d73
What I've done is pushed a request to our automation to run all of the tests under dom/html/test (including the one you've fixed). I've requested 20 retriggers each to see if the intermittent failure shows up in any of them.
Each of our test "types" is represented by a symbol in that link, and there's even further categorization after that. For example, "1" and "bc1" are part of the M suite. In this case, M stands for mochitest, which is the name of the testing framework that we're using. 1 and bc1 are flavours of mochitest, and each flavour has different capabilities and powers. Your test is a "browser" mochitest, so it's running in the ones that start with "bc".
Checking the test log of one of the Linux 64 bc1s here: https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/try-builds/mconley@mozilla.com-cc09e297fff69d67caa4853909b9aa91bfc09d73/try-linux64/try_ubuntu64_vm_test-mochitest-browser-chrome-1-bm51-tests1-linux64-build473.txt.gz
If I do a Find in Page on that log, I can find browser_bug592641.js, so the test you patched is running in that suite, and it appears to be passing.
Green means pass. Orange means one or more tests failed. In this case, I'm seeing failures on OS X 10.10 debug for "1" (Also called "Mochitest 1"). Clicking on that orange will show a readout of the failure in the bottom pane. Each one is reporting this failure:
TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | leakcheck | default process: 10216 bytes leaked (BasicContainerLayer, BasicImplData, BasicLayerManager, BasicPaintedLayer, CompositableClient, ...)
Which is a pre-existing very frequent orange, and is almost certainly unrelated to your patch, so we can ignore it. The red "1" in the M-e10s group means that the test resulted in the browser crashing, but this one says that this is an intermittent assertion failure for the dom/html/test/test_fullscreen-api.html test, so again, unrelated.
So so far, we're looking okay here. The intermittents that we just saw in the try push are annoying because they're not related, but we have to check on them anyway to see if we've broken anything. That's precisely why your work here is so useful - the more intermittents we get rid of, the more we can trust our test results the first time! :)
I've left the needinfo on myself to check the try build once all of the tests are done (likely on the weekend or on Monday), after which, if we're all green, we should be good to land.
In the meantime, let me know if you want any suggestions on another bug like this you can fix.
Flags: needinfo?(kevchan85)
Comment 93•8 years ago
|
||
This looks good to me on try, despite the other (unrelated) oranges.
Flags: needinfo?(mconley)
Comment 94•8 years ago
|
||
Author: kevin <kevchan85@yahoo.com>
Bug number: 1134307
Commit message: Bug 1134307 - Remove a CPOW from browser_bug592641.js to avoid a dead CPOW intermittent. r=mconley
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Reporter | ||
Comment 96•8 years ago
|
||
I tweaked the commit message to be a bit more descriptive.
Comment 97•8 years ago
|
||
Pushed by ryanvm@gmail.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/fx-team/rev/89ea6ea53888
Access the title of the loaded page by using ctx.tab2Browser.contentTitle in browser_bug592641.js to avoid CPOW usage. r=mconley
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 98•8 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
status-firefox51:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 51
Reporter | ||
Comment 99•8 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
Flags: in-testsuite+
Reporter | ||
Comment 100•8 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
Comment 101•8 years ago
|
||
Pushed by ryanvm@gmail.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/cea23a652dcf
Remove some CPOWs from browser_windowName.js to avoid a dead CPOW intermittent. r=mconley
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•