Closed Bug 1137532 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago

error: 'AssertOnDispatchThread' marked 'override' but does not override any member functions : need to update clang on OSX64

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: Build Config, defect)

SeaMonkey 2.36 Branch
x86_64
macOS
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(seamonkey2.35 fixed, seamonkey2.36 fixed)

RESOLVED FIXED
seamonkey2.36
Tracking Status
seamonkey2.35 --- fixed
seamonkey2.36 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: ewong, Assigned: ewong)

References

Details

Attachments

(2 files)

On our OSX64 Debug build, we're red due to: /usr/local/bin/ccache /builds/slave/c-cen-t-osx64-dbg/build/clang/bin/clang++ -o nsTypeAheadFind.o -c -fvisibility=hidden -DSTATIC_EXPORTABLE_JS_API -DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API -DIMPL_LIBXUL -DAB_CD=en-US -DNO_NSPR_10_SUPPORT -I/builds/slave/c-cen-t-osx64-dbg/build/mozilla/toolkit/components/typeaheadfind -I. -I../../../dist/include -I/builds/slave/c-cen-t-osx64-dbg/build/objdir/dist/include/nspr -I/builds/slave/c-cen-t-osx64-dbg/build/objdir/dist/include/nss -fPIC -Qunused-arguments -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include ../../../mozilla-config.h -MD -MP -MF .deps/nsTypeAheadFind.o.pp -Qunused-arguments -Qunused-arguments -Wall -Wempty-body -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsign-compare -Wwrite-strings -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wno-c++0x-extensions -Wno-extended-offsetof -Wno-unknown-warning-option -Wno-return-type-c-linkage -fno-exceptions -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-rtti -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fno-exceptions -fno-math-errno -std=gnu++0x -pthread -DNO_X11 -pipe -DDEBUG -DTRACING -gdwarf-2 -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer /builds/slave/c-cen-t-osx64-dbg/build/mozilla/toolkit/components/typeaheadfind/nsTypeAheadFind.cpp In file included from Unified_cpp_layout_generic3.cpp:29: In file included from ../../../mozilla/layout/generic/nsVideoFrame.cpp:14: In file included from ../../dist/include/mozilla/dom/HTMLVideoElement.h:11: In file included from ../../dist/include/mozilla/dom/HTMLMediaElement.h:22: In file included from ../../dist/include/MediaDecoder.h:200: In file included from ../../dist/include/mozilla/CDMProxy.h:16: In file included from ../../dist/include/mozilla/CDMCaps.h:16: In file included from ../../dist/include/SamplesWaitingForKey.h:11: In file included from ../../dist/include/MediaTaskQueue.h:15: ../../dist/include/MediaPromise.h:257:16: error: 'AssertOnDispatchThread' marked 'override' but does not override any member functions virtual void AssertOnDispatchThread() MOZ_OVERRIDE ^ 1 error generated. make[4]: *** [Unified_cpp_layout_generic3.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** [layout/generic/target] Error 2 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... This was from http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/6a393700a62d We need to upgrade our clang compiler on our OSX64 via tooltool manifest.
Attached patch patch #1 (v1)Splinter Review
Looking at m-c's releng.manifest, do we also need the sccache.tar.gz and change the info with the setup.sh?
Assignee: nobody → ewong
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Flags: needinfo?(bugspam.Callek)
Attachment #8570245 - Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek)
(In reply to Edmund Wong (:ewong) from comment #1) > Created attachment 8570245 [details] [diff] [review] > proposed patch (v1) > > Looking at m-c's releng.manifest, do we also need the sccache.tar.gz and > change the info with the setup.sh? From IRC, Callek said no. Also post-push review.
Flags: needinfo?(bugspam.Callek)
Comment on attachment 8570245 [details] [diff] [review] patch #1 (v1) [Approval Request Comment] Regression caused by (bug #): User impact if declined: Testing completed (on m-c, etc.): Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): String changes made by this patch: Pushed to comm-central: https://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/9f9a344d0f24
Attachment #8570245 - Flags: approval-comm-aurora?
(In reply to Edmund Wong (:ewong) from comment #3) > Comment on attachment 8570245 [details] [diff] [review] > proposed patch (v1) > > [Approval Request Comment] > Regression caused by (bug #): bug 1128576 > User impact if declined: bustage due to missing correct clang version > Testing completed (on m-c, etc.): > Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): > String changes made by this patch: >
Blocks: 1138750
Attachment #8570245 - Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek)
Attachment #8570245 - Flags: approval-comm-aurora?
Attached patch patch #2 (v2)Splinter Review
for post push review
Attachment #8570245 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8571719 - Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek)
Comment on attachment 8570245 [details] [diff] [review] patch #1 (v1) This patch is also needed on top of the proposed patch (v2).
Attachment #8570245 - Attachment is obsolete: false
Attachment #8570245 - Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek)
Attachment #8570245 - Attachment description: proposed patch (v1) → patch #1 (v1)
Attachment #8571719 - Attachment description: proposed patch (v2) → patch #2 (v2)
Comment on attachment 8570245 [details] [diff] [review] patch #1 (v1) [Approval Request Comment] Regression caused by (bug #): User impact if declined: bustage in osx64 builds. (needs patch 2) as well. Testing completed (on m-c, etc.): Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): String changes made by this patch:
Attachment #8570245 - Flags: approval-comm-aurora?
Comment on attachment 8571719 [details] [diff] [review] patch #2 (v2) [Approval Request Comment] Regression caused by (bug #): User impact if declined: osx64 build bustage. (need patch 1) Testing completed (on m-c, etc.): Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): String changes made by this patch:
Attachment #8571719 - Flags: approval-comm-aurora?
Comment on attachment 8570245 [details] [diff] [review] patch #1 (v1) Review of attachment 8570245 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- a+ for aurora based on results from central.
Attachment #8570245 - Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek)
Attachment #8570245 - Flags: review+
Attachment #8570245 - Flags: approval-comm-aurora?
Attachment #8570245 - Flags: approval-comm-aurora+
Comment on attachment 8571719 [details] [diff] [review] patch #2 (v2) Review of attachment 8571719 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- a+ for aurora based on results from central.
Attachment #8571719 - Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek)
Attachment #8571719 - Flags: review+
Attachment #8571719 - Flags: approval-comm-aurora?
Attachment #8571719 - Flags: approval-comm-aurora+
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → seamonkey2.36
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: