Closed Bug 1139895 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago

REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | file:///builds/slave/test/build/tests/reftest/tests/layout/reftests/bugs/1062792-1.html | image comparison (==), max difference: 1, number of differing pixels: 5

Categories

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Runtime, defect)

x86_64
Linux
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(firefox39 fixed)

RESOLVED FIXED
2.2 S8 (20mar)
Tracking Status
firefox39 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: gerard-majax, Assigned: gerard-majax)

References

Details

(Whiteboard: [systemsfe])

Attachments

(5 files, 3 obsolete files)

So we have this test failing on Mulet, and it's not something skipped on B2G/B2G Desktop
Assignee: nobody → lissyx+mozillians
Attached image reference screenshot
Timothy, do you have any idea why the test report failure ? The screenshots extracted from the try log shows nothing :(
Flags: needinfo?(tnikkel)
In the tree there is a file called layout/tools/reftest/reftest-analyzer.xhtml, it's used to process reftest logs and analyze the failures when you open it in a browser. It has a circle differences option which is good for cases like this where the images look the same to human eyes. In this case it looks like there are tiny differences at the ends of two scrollbars that overlap. I think we should just add fuzz to the reftest to make it pass.
Flags: needinfo?(tnikkel)
(In reply to Timothy Nikkel (:tn) from comment #5)
> In the tree there is a file called
> layout/tools/reftest/reftest-analyzer.xhtml, it's used to process reftest
> logs and analyze the failures when you open it in a browser. It has a circle
> differences option which is good for cases like this where the images look
> the same to human eyes. In this case it looks like there are tiny
> differences at the ends of two scrollbars that overlap. I think we should
> just add fuzz to the reftest to make it pass.

You are right.
This exposes the differences. It's around the junctions of scrollbar, and I'll go with fuzz for this.
(In reply to Alexandre LISSY :gerard-majax from comment #10)
> https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=d6a0430596e0

broken for a typo ..
Attachment #8573959 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment on attachment 8574036 [details] [diff] [review]
Add fuzz for 1062792-1.html r=...

Not sure if you can review, in case you cannot, thanks for forwarding :)
Attachment #8574036 - Flags: review?(tnikkel)
Attachment #8574036 - Flags: review?(tnikkel) → review+
Attached patch Add fuzz for 1062792-1.html r=tn (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #8574036 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8574261 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment on attachment 8574262 [details] [diff] [review]
Add fuzz for 1062792-1.html r=tn

Carrying r+
Attachment #8574262 - Flags: review+
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/29eb3c2805dc
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → 2.2 S8 (20mar)
Whiteboard: [systemsfe]
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: