Closed
Bug 114196
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 24 years ago
Menubar, logo and url bar turn black on load of URL
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: rcgnaber, Assigned: attinasi)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(6 files)
The menubar ans so on turn black after the page has loaded. Untouched items turn
black also when you move the mouse over it (triggering a redraw). The browser
does not crash. If you enter a new url (blindly) and load the page, items will
turn to normal (either by themselves, or by triggering a redraw).
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
Upon loading of this page, it makes the impression of "flashing" in black. I
think that's because it loads a background image. However, I was unable to
trigger the flashing behaviour you mention by hover over links or whatever.
Everything seems to work fine for me. I'm using build 2001-12-05-04 on Windows 98.
-> blind guess, ImageLib
Assignee: asa → pavlov
Component: Browser-General → ImageLib
QA Contact: doronr → tpreston
Also, when I have loaded the URL and switch away and back again in virtual
desktops in X, the screen is completely black, except for some imagery from the
different virtual desktop and hence becomes totally unusable.
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
That's a quite old build. Can you download the latest nightly and re-try?
Sorry for not thinking of that one. It's the same story on the latest nightly:
build 2001120721.
Comment 5•24 years ago
|
||
hey,confirming using build 2001120712 on Linux, that's the first time I see this
kind of problem. Perhaps some CSS interacting with own Mozilla's CSS ?
I don't know which component it should belong to though.
Severity -> Critical because black partsappearin existing windows.
Severity: normal → critical
Comment 6•24 years ago
|
||
Comment 7•24 years ago
|
||
The bug seems to deal with some Flash applet being loaded within an IFRAME tag.
When using a sniffer, the other file retreived loads a Flash ad.
Comment 8•24 years ago
|
||
No, it also happen without Flash plug-in (still using build 2001120721 on Linux).
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
Got same result with linux build 2001120720 using attachment 60952 [details]. But even
better, I tried it with 0.9.6 under XP Pro and the browser hangs. No screen
redraws, no menus are responsive, the animated moz icon stops. However, the
windowx close (X) box in upper right corner of app DID close the app and the
task manager did NOT say the app was not responding... Reproduced the hang three
times under XP and 0.9.6
Comment 11•24 years ago
|
||
current cvs linux shows the same behaviour.
Context-menus go black as well - I don't think this is imglib. Frames?
Confirming, adding blizzard to CC
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Comment 12•24 years ago
|
||
over to layout
Assignee: pavlov → attinasi
Component: ImageLib → Layout
QA Contact: tpreston → petersen
Comment 13•24 years ago
|
||
This is caused by too large WIDTH in IFRAME element. Testcase e.g.:
<html>
<body>
<IFRAME SRC="http://www.mozilla.org/images/mozilla-banner.gif" WIDTH=60000 />
</body>
</html>
For me the critical value is WIDTH=1025 (Linux, 2001120906, 1024x768 X); in that
case it is possible to recover by hitting the "back" button (already black), but
not for larger values. IMG and OBJECT are not affected.
Comment 14•24 years ago
|
||
related/dup of bug 91747
| Reporter | ||
Comment 15•24 years ago
|
||
Well, bug 91747 does not show the same behaviour (the black stuff) on linux,
since it is about a large iframe height value instead of width (too large a
height value is not a problem for linux it seems). Bug 64049 (which is mentioned
in the comments of bug 91747) however does show the same behaviour as this bug
(114196), because the testcase has large width and large height values.
My question: mark it as a duplicate of 64049 and enter some comment about linux
behaviour in that bug or leave as it is?
Comment 16•24 years ago
|
||
Comment 17•24 years ago
|
||
Comment 18•24 years ago
|
||
forget those - wrong bug!
| Reporter | ||
Comment 19•24 years ago
|
||
Since there was no response to my question, I am assuming nobody has a strong
opinion on the matter and I'll mark this bug as a duplicate to bug 64049
(assuming I can).
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 64049 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•