Closed
Bug 1143984
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
B2G NetworkManager: 'active' should only set for default connections, e.g. wifi or default data
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: RIL, defect)
Tracking
(tracking-b2g:backlog, firefox41 fixed)
People
(Reporter: jessica, Assigned: jessica)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 2 obsolete files)
|
2.76 KB,
patch
|
edgar
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Currently, NetworkManager's |active| may be set to a secondary data connection, e.g. mms. However, we think |active| should only be set for default connections, e.g. wifi or default data.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
Assignee: nobody → jjong
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8579270 [details] [diff] [review]
patch, v1.
I think this is ready. Edgar, may I have your review? Thanks.
Attachment #8579270 -
Attachment description: WIP. → patch, v1.
Attachment #8579270 -
Flags: review?(echen)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8579270 [details] [diff] [review]
patch, v1.
Cancelling review since we need to fix dns default interface issue, see Bug 992772.
Attachment #8579270 -
Flags: review?(echen)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
Fix dns default interface issue, not tested yet.
Attachment #8579270 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
| Assignee | ||
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
Hmm, I'm still finding a way to test SDK_VERSION 18, since base image v123 (JB) seems not to work with master. It makes me wonder if we need that ugly fix for SDK_VERSION 18, since it doesn't work current master and it is no longer supported on Flame:
"Note: Firefox OS images v180 and above are based on Android KK (Kitkat, 4.4); JB (Jellybean, 4.1–4.3) builds have now been discontinued and are no longer supported, so don't use anything older than v180."
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox_OS/Phone_guide/Flame/Updating_your_Flame
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
We'll wait for bug 992772 to be landed first.
Comment 8•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jessica Jong [:jjong] [:jessica] from comment #5)
> Hmm, I'm still finding a way to test SDK_VERSION 18, since base image v123
> (JB) seems not to work with master. It makes me wonder if we need that ugly
> fix for SDK_VERSION 18, since it doesn't work current master and it is no
> longer supported on Flame:
>
> "Note: Firefox OS images v180 and above are based on Android KK (Kitkat,
> 4.4); JB (Jellybean, 4.1–4.3) builds have now been discontinued and are no
> longer supported, so don't use anything older than v180."
>
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox_OS/Phone_guide/Flame/
> Updating_your_Flame
I just found OPEN_C is still using jellybean. Please see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1114935#c150.
Looks like we still need to take jellybean into consideration. :(
| Assignee | ||
Comment 9•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Edgar Chen [:edgar][:echen] (OOO 3/21~4/6) from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jessica Jong [:jjong] [:jessica] from comment #5)
> > Hmm, I'm still finding a way to test SDK_VERSION 18, since base image v123
> > (JB) seems not to work with master. It makes me wonder if we need that ugly
> > fix for SDK_VERSION 18, since it doesn't work current master and it is no
> > longer supported on Flame:
> >
> > "Note: Firefox OS images v180 and above are based on Android KK (Kitkat,
> > 4.4); JB (Jellybean, 4.1–4.3) builds have now been discontinued and are no
> > longer supported, so don't use anything older than v180."
> >
> > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox_OS/Phone_guide/Flame/
> > Updating_your_Flame
>
> I just found OPEN_C is still using jellybean. Please see
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1114935#c150.
> Looks like we still need to take jellybean into consideration. :(
Alright, I will let Henry know. :)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 10•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8579972 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
| Assignee | ||
Comment 11•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8605703 [details] [diff] [review]
patch, v1.
Edgar, may I have you review on this, now that bug 992772 has landed? Thanks!
Attachment #8605703 -
Flags: review?(echen)
Comment 12•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8605703 [details] [diff] [review]
patch, v1.
Review of attachment 8605703 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Looks good to me, thank you.
Attachment #8605703 -
Flags: review?(echen) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 13•11 years ago
|
||
Comment 15•11 years ago
|
||
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•