Closed Bug 1147462 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago

Clone safebrowsing list into second list to test client-server multiple-list synchronization

Categories

(Cloud Services :: Server: Shavar, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: telliott, Assigned: ckolos)

References

Details

We need to test that the safebrowsing client and server are correctly synchronizing two unrelated lists. Please set up a second copy of the safebrowsing list at the current endpoint with a different name.
Steps to end-to-end test: 0) Create a new profile 1) Point Firefox pref browser.trackingprotection.updateURL to the endpoint, 2) Point browser.trackingprotection.gethashURL to the endpoint 3) Set urlclassifier.trackingTable to "mozpub-track-digest256,<new_table_name>" 4) Restart Firefox 5) Enable privacy.trackingprotection.enabled 6) Check for the presence of {mozpub-track-digest,new_table_name}.{cache,pset,sbstore} in the local profile. There should also be the standard Google tables goog-{phish,malware}-shavar.*. On Linux the profile dir is ~/.cache/mozilla/firefox/<profile>/safebrowsing. On Mac that's somewhere in ~/Library/.
Blocks: shumway-m3
OS: Mac OS X → All
Hardware: x86 → All
This can be a stage environment deployment, correct?
(In reply to Chris Kolosiwsky [:ckolos] from comment #2) > This can be a stage environment deployment, correct? Yes.
For testing, we don't actually need a second data source. We can simply reuse the data for the existing list. You should be able to simply create another section in the INI file for the service and point that at the same data file used for the existing list being served. Something along the lines of: [new_table_name] type = digest256 source = <path from the mozpub-track-digest256 section, i.e. s3file://s3_bucket_name/data_file_key_name>
Assignee: rtilder → ckolos
I'll ping :rpapa and see if I can make the required server config changes on the .6 single instance he has for testing purposes
Yea, let's do it. thanks, Chris
(In reply to Ryan Tilder [:rtilder] from comment #4) > For testing, we don't actually need a second data source. We can simply > reuse the data for the existing list. You should be able to simply create > another section in the INI file for the service and point that at the same > data file used for the existing list being served. Something along the > lines of: > > [new_table_name] > type = digest256 > source = <path from the mozpub-track-digest256 section, i.e. > s3file://s3_bucket_name/data_file_key_name> Ryan, I see that Monica provided the steps for e2e verification, but for server load-testing do we need any additional tests (other than the one you provided before)?
Flags: needinfo?(rtilder)
(In reply to Richard Pappalardo [:rpapa][:rpappalardo] from comment #7) > > Ryan, I see that Monica provided the steps for e2e verification, but for > server load-testing do we need any additional tests (other than the one you > provided before)? > In the long run? Yes. But for now the hacky curl command line I provided should be sufficient.
Flags: needinfo?(rtilder)
I've made the following changes to the shavar.ini and restarted the server --- shavar.ini 2015-04-03 15:46:33.967002664 +0000 +++ shavar.new 2015-04-03 15:36:03.542523098 +0000 @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ [shavar] default_proto_ver = 2.0 lists_served = mozpub-track-digest256 + foo-track-digest256 moz-abp-shavar lists_root = tests refresh_check_interval = 3600 @@ -57,6 +58,11 @@ not_publishing_deltas = True source = s3+file://net-mozaws-stage-shavar/list//mozpub-track-digest256 +[foo-track-digest256] +type = digest256 +not_publishing_deltas = True +source = s3+file://net-mozaws-stage-shavar/list//foo-track-digest256 + [moz-abp-shavar] type = shavar source = s3+file://net-mozaws-stage-shavar/list//mozpub-track-digest256
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.