Closed
Bug 1147662
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Differential Testing: Different output message involving recursion
Categories
(Core :: JavaScript Engine: JIT, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla39
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox39 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: gkw, Assigned: bbouvier)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression, testcase)
Attachments
(1 file)
1.34 KB,
patch
|
shu
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
try { (function() { let x = (function f(y) { if (y == 0) { x return } return f(y - 1) })(3) print("FOO") })() } catch (e) {} $ ./js-32-dm-nsprBuild-linux-97076df948c2 --fuzzing-safe --no-threads --ion-eager testcase.js FOO $ ./js-32-dm-nsprBuild-linux-97076df948c2 --fuzzing-safe --no-threads --baseline-eager testcase.js Tested this on m-c rev 97076df948c2. My configure flags are: CXX="g++ -m32 -msse2 -mfpmath=sse" CC="gcc -m32 -msse2 -mfpmath=sse" AR=ar PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR=/usr/lib/pkgconfig sh /home/gkwong/trees/mozilla-central/js/src/configure --target=i686-pc-linux --enable-nspr-build --enable-more-deterministic --with-ccache --enable-gczeal --enable-debug-symbols --disable-tests python -u ~/fuzzing/js/compileShell.py -b "--32 --enable-nspr-build --enable-more-deterministic" -r 97076df948c2 autoBisect shows this is probably related to the following changeset: The first bad revision is: changeset: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/fbe012eea2e6 user: Benjamin Bouvier date: Fri Mar 20 16:28:58 2015 +0100 summary: Bug 1143758: Make LexicalCheck movable and bailout when a lexical isn't initialized; r=shu Benjamin, is bug 1143758 a likely regressor?
Flags: needinfo?(benj)
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
Yes it is. Sorry about that: i forgot an instruction can be movable *and* a guard at the same time, which is needed here (otherwise we discard the lexical check, as its results is unused).
Assignee: nobody → benj
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Flags: needinfo?(benj)
Attachment #8583772 -
Flags: review?(shu)
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8583772 [details] [diff] [review] lc.patch Review of attachment 8583772 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Should've caught that in review. :(
Attachment #8583772 -
Flags: review?(shu) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/46e3f17440a7
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/46e3f17440a7
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite+
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla39
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•