1155416 - Can't search with super search for a Signature by only one Version

Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME

(Socorro :: Webapp, task)

Description

[Tobias B. Besemer [:BesTo] (QA)]

Example:
Try to search with super search for the signature "shutdownhang | _VEC_memset".
Add as new line "version has term 37".

What I expect is:
Finding all reports with the signature "shutdownhang | _VEC_memset" that were send in with FF37.x.

What I get:
"No results were found."



Second try:
Use this time "version does not have term 37".

Expect:
Finding all reports with the signature "shutdownhang | _VEC_memset" that were send in excluding them send in with FF37.x.

Get:
All send in reports.

Comment 1

[Robert Kaiser]

1) The Table intentionally doesn't have versions listed.
2) The data in that Table tab is bogus nowadays.

Comment 2

[Robert Kaiser]

Wrong bug, sorry.

Comment 3

[[DEACTIVATED] Adrian Gaudebert]

"37" is not a valid version number. You'd want to be more precise and list all the actual version numbers that you are interested in. 

Or, we could make the version field have string operator, so you could do something like "version" "starts with" "37". KaiRo, what do you think?

Comment 4

[Robert Kaiser]

I have never needed that so far but it might be useful to be able to search for "starts with" "37.".
Actually, I think if I move my custom reports to the API 1:1, I probably need that there at least.

Comment 5

[[DEACTIVATED] Adrian Gaudebert]

stage: https://crash-stats.allizom.org/search/?product=Firefox&version=%2438.
prod: https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/search/?product=Firefox&version=~b99

Comment 6

[[DEACTIVATED] Adrian Gaudebert]

I have reverted that, since it breaks the ability to select several versions. Bug 1164062 is needed first.

Comment 7

[Will Kahn-Greene [:willkg] ET needinfo? me]

I can search for things for a single version, so I think this is a WORKSFORME. The version has to be correct. "37" is not a valid version, but as soon as you start typing it it suggests valid versions and you can pick one.

Comment #3 and comment #4 should really be spun out into a different bug if people want that functionality--that's a different beast entirely.

Given that, I'm closing this out.