Closed
Bug 1160845
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
No Firefox linux nightly l10n builds since April 30
Categories
(Release Engineering :: General, defect)
Release Engineering
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: pascalc, Assigned: dustin)
References
Details
Attachments
(2 files, 1 obsolete file)
793 bytes,
patch
|
dustin
:
review+
massimo
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
39 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
massimo
:
review+
dustin
:
review+
|
Details |
Last Firefox linux l10n build in http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla-central-l10n/ has been built on April 30
There were en-US nightly builds in the last days.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Picking a random spot instance:
[root@bld-linux64-spot-038.build.releng.use1.mozilla.com ~]# ls -al /builds/relengapi.tok
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 115 May 3 01:20 /builds/relengapi.tok
So either (1) this is done in mock without reflecting that file into the mock, or (b) this is done on an old AMI for some reason.
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
Not run in mock:
argv: ['/tools/buildbot/bin/python', 'scripts/scripts/desktop_l10n.py', '--branch-config', 'single_locale/mozilla-central.py', '--platform-config', 'single_locale/linux64.py', '--environment-config', 'single_locale/production.py', '--balrog-config', 'balrog/production.py', '--total-chunks', '3', '--this-chunk', '1']
the instance is long gone, so I can't see the AMI used. It would seem odd to revert to an old AMI just for l10n's though.
More matching logs might help.
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → dustin
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
The failure is in mock, though -- maybe I'm misreading the logs and this is run from mock.
Notably, the mock runs mirror /builds/gapi.data into the mock environment, so this may be necessary for relengapi.tok too.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
/r/8079 - Bug 1160845: reflect relengapi.tok into mock environments; r=mgerva
Pull down this commit:
hg pull -r 941bd99e080e6f73eaf95120492b602f0b7d676f https://reviewboard-hg.mozilla.org/build-mozharness
Attachment #8600879 -
Flags: review?(mgervasini)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8600879 -
Flags: review?(mgervasini) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8600879 [details]
MozReview Request: bz://1160845/dustin
remote: https://hg.mozilla.org/build/mozharness/rev/941bd99e080e
Attachment #8600879 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8600879 [details]
MozReview Request: bz://1160845/dustin
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/8077/#review6859
Ship It!
Attachment #8600879 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
I think this is finished, but I think that running a rebuild will use the old code, so we need to wait for another fresh nightly.
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
last l10n log: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/2015/05/2015-05-05-03-02-06-mozilla-central-l10n/mozilla-central-linux-l10n-nightly-1-unknown-bm77-build1-build6.txt.gz
We need relengapi.tok for linux 32 as well.
Attachment #8601501 -
Flags: review?(rail)
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8601501 [details] [diff] [review]
[mozharness] Bug 1160845 - add relengapi.tok to l10n mock_files for linux.patch
I'm not sure how my grep missed that
Attachment #8601501 -
Flags: review?(rail) → review+
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8601501 [details] [diff] [review]
[mozharness] Bug 1160845 - add relengapi.tok to l10n mock_files for linux.patch
landed: https://hg.mozilla.org/build/mozharness/rev/e47abb2ed057
Attachment #8601501 -
Flags: checked-in+
Comment 12•10 years ago
|
||
landed on production branch: https://hg.mozilla.org/build/mozharness/rev/565ea3ec1d4d
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•10 years ago
|
||
I haven't heard anything, so let's call this good.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8600879 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8620222 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•10 years ago
|
||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Component: General Automation → General
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•