Closed
Bug 1162910
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
[bluetooth2] Make bluetoothd as the default backend
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Bluetooth, defect)
Tracking
(firefox41 fixed)
RESOLVED
FIXED
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox41 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: yrliou, Assigned: yrliou)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [webbt-api])
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
Currently bluetooth2 still uses bluedroid as the default backend. This bug is to switch bluetoothd as the default backend for bluetooth2.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
Hi Thomas, We have recently finished PTS test for daemon+apiv2 by our team members. This patch is for QA test round to test daemon+apiv2 directly. Please help to review my patch. Thanks, Jocelyn
Attachment #8604013 -
Flags: review?(tzimmermann)
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8604013 [details] [diff] [review] Bug 1162910: Make bluetooth daemon as the default backend of BT APIv2. Review of attachment 8604013 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- The patch itself is OK, but what about GATT?
Attachment #8604013 -
Flags: review?(tzimmermann) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Thomas Zimmermann [:tzimmermann] [:tdz] from comment #3) > Comment on attachment 8604013 [details] [diff] [review] > Bug 1162910: Make bluetooth daemon as the default backend of BT APIv2. > > Review of attachment 8604013 [details] [diff] [review]: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > The patch itself is OK, but what about GATT? It's still under development, I suppose we could just fallback to HAL during development before we finish gatt support in daemon? For BT APIv2 itself, I think it's ready to use daemon now. Any thoughts?
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
Sure, if falling back is OK for you. For me, the sooner we get rid of the old internal backend, the better. For the daemon's GATT support, I'm working it and I guess I'll have something ready today or tomorrow.
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Thomas Zimmermann [:tzimmermann] [:tdz] from comment #5) > Sure, if falling back is OK for you. For me, the sooner we get rid of the > old internal backend, the better. > > For the daemon's GATT support, I'm working it and I guess I'll have > something ready today or tomorrow. Per offline discussion with Bruce, it's OK that we manually fallback to HAL at this moment. We also want to switch to daemon ASAP, and this can be the first step. I'm also start working on GATT client gecko part, though it might not be ready yet tomorrow, I should have something in this week. :) Thanks, Jocelyn
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8604013 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
Though the change is trivial, I submitted to try just in case. Try result: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=5747e5813c25
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•