Closed
Bug 116530
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
Include shortcut icons when exporting to bookmarks.html
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: UI Design, enhancement)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
DUPLICATE
of bug 117895
Future
People
(Reporter: hakon_, Assigned: trudelle)
Details
Could the shortcut icons for each bookmarks be saved along with the URL's to
bookmarks.html?
At least it could be prompted for when exporting the bookmarks.
The output file wouldn't get significally larger, and they could be saved at
the last part of the document so that it wouldn't effect on reading time.
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
I bet this is a duplicate of some bug asking us to cache/save favicons upon
restart/quit. Jrgm, do you know of one?
Component: Bookmarks → XP Apps: GUI Features
Whiteboard: DUPEME
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
Well, we do (modulo bugs and crashes) save the favicons in the disk cache, and
they are available over browser restarts.
But this bug is a suggestion to serialize the favicons into the bookmarks file
so that they can be retained as a single unit. That's an interesting idea, but
I'll dispute the assertion that this wouldn't have a significant size impact:
100 favicon's would consume >200KB, which is larger than a large bookmarks file
is already. It might be possible to read them in lazily, but not as efficiently
as reading them from a hash-based disk cache.
At any rate, -> Future
Assignee: pchen → trudelle
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Whiteboard: DUPEME
Target Milestone: --- → Future
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
Bug 117895 asks for a separate storage area for favicons while this bug proposes
to use bookmark.html as such a storage area - seems like a dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 117895 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Reopening because this bug was opened before bug 117895
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: DUPLICATE → ---
Comment 5•23 years ago
|
||
Yes, generally bugs should be duped against the earliest report of a defect,
all things being equal.
But reopening this bug almost _two_months_ after it was marked as a duplicate
of bug 117895 is just a stupidly pointless waste of time.
reclosing as a duplicate and verifying.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 117895 ***
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago → 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Core → Mozilla Application Suite
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•