Implement the new behavior for AudioParam.value
Categories
(Core :: Web Audio, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: padenot, Unassigned)
Details
(Whiteboard: [spec])
Updated•10 years ago
|
Comment 2•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 4•4 years ago
|
||
Does anyone know if this will be fixed?
Comment 5•4 years ago
|
||
I cannot generate volume fading sounds with Firefox using the exponentialRampToValueAtTime method. That was a bad surprise. It worked very fine in Brave/Chromium. Looks like Mozilla has no interest in implementing the Audio API, so why is it even documented? So disappointing.
So will this be fixed or will you just close this issue and give up? I mean, after 7 years with no attention, what is the realistic chance of this being fixed?
The only workaround is pre-generating wave files in an audio editor and play them in the browser. It feels like pre-generating images in an image editor for simple effects like shadows or gradients. Like back in the 90s when we didn't have CSS.
(In reply to Yves Goergen from comment #5)
I cannot generate volume fading sounds with Firefox using the
exponentialRampToValueAtTimemethod. That was a bad surprise. It worked very fine in Brave/Chromium. Looks like Mozilla has no interest in implementing the Audio API, so why is it even documented? So disappointing.So will this be fixed or will you just close this issue and give up? I mean, after 7 years with no attention, what is the realistic chance of this being fixed?
The only workaround is pre-generating wave files in an audio editor and play them in the browser. It feels like pre-generating images in an image editor for simple effects like shadows or gradients. Like back in the 90s when we didn't have CSS.
About 2-3 years ago I removed FF from the list of supported browsers in the API doc so the documentation should be OK: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/AudioParam/exponentialRampToValueAtTime#browser_compatibility
The github admins for the API doc forced me to write "partial support" on the feature though, because "the function exists", even though by now the feature has been broken for more years than it could have been working. Judging by the age of this bug and taking into consideration that Mozilla has been cutting staff over the recent years, I sincerely doubt that this bug will ever be fixed. FF is falling apart and in turn bleeding users, because no users are interested in "Differentiated user experience" or fugly desktop tabs, when more and more websites are broken or underperforming in FF. I am inches away from moving to ungoogled-chromium or something similar, even though I have been a user since the beta days (even donated and bought a tshirt back when I was a poor high school student in 2004), but life is too short to waste time on a bug ridden semi-abandoned browser. I work for a company that makes B2B software, and they ditched official FF support about two years ago because (a) no costumers used FF anymore (b) every other month a new bug in FF would appear and break something and rarely be fixed. It was great while it was great.
Ahh.. glad to get that off my chest :)
| Comment hidden (advocacy) |
Updated•3 years ago
|
| Reporter | ||
Comment 8•1 year ago
|
||
We've fixed that some time ago.
Description
•