Closed
Bug 1171841
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
[TC] Fix ubuntu-build image to work with clang (for asan builds).
Categories
(Release Engineering :: General, defect)
Release Engineering
General
Tracking
(firefox41 fixed)
RESOLVED
FIXED
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox41 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: mrrrgn, Assigned: mrrrgn)
References
Details
Attachments
(3 files)
1.20 KB,
patch
|
dustin
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
1.50 KB,
patch
|
dustin
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
1.15 KB,
patch
|
dustin
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Right now the tooltool clang that lives in /home/worker/workspace/src/clang is broken because it can't find the appropriate libraries. We also need to install valgrind.
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → winter2718
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8615942 -
Flags: review?(dustin)
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8615951 -
Flags: review?(dustin)
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8615942 -
Attachment description: valgrind.diff → Path 1
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8615942 -
Attachment description: Path 1 → Path 1 - Add valgrind to ubuntu builder
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8615951 -
Attachment description: Patch 2 → Patch 2 - Fix include paths for clang
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
Should we have mozbootstrap installing valgrind instead? If no, then I think this looks fine.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8615953 -
Flags: review?(dustin)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Dustin J. Mitchell [:dustin] from comment #3)
> Should we have mozbootstrap installing valgrind instead? If no, then I
> think this looks fine.
I hadn't thought so. The other libraries are really necessary to do a ff build; but valgrind is optional. I don't want to totally hijack mozboot by loading it with libraries that devs don't need. I may be mistaken about the utility of having valgrind for devs though.
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Dustin J. Mitchell [:dustin] from comment #3)
> Should we have mozbootstrap installing valgrind instead? If no, then I
> think this looks fine.
I've got to think of this more I think. It's a tough call.
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
I'll mark this r+ if you decide that this is the right course.
I think the key questions are:
* how important is the specific version of valgrind (we're installing "latest" now)?
* how frequently will that version need to change (and thus how important is it that it's easy)?
* how important is it that devs using mozbootstrap get exactly the same version as automation?
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8615942 -
Flags: review?(dustin) → review+
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8615951 -
Flags: review?(dustin) → review+
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8615953 -
Flags: review?(dustin) → review+
Updated•8 years ago
|
Component: Tools → General
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•