Closed
Bug 1179061
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
Create CSP tests for signed packages
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Security, defect, P2)
Core
DOM: Security
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: pauljt, Assigned: ethan)
References
Details
We should start creating some CSP tests for signed packages. Separating this bug from implementation of package CSP so we can start this in parallel.
Reporter | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P1
Reporter | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: --- → 2.5+
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → ettseng
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
Before writing CSP test for signed packages, we have to at least add default CSP policies for signed packages. Thus, this bug should be blocked by Bug 1179060 - Apply a default CSP for signed packaged content.
Depends on: 1179060
Target Milestone: --- → FxOS-S6 (04Sep)
Reporter | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Priority: P1 → P2
Target Milestone: FxOS-S6 (04Sep) → FxOS-S8 (02Oct)
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
[Tracking Requested - why for this release]: This bug as part of New Security Model is not a 2.5 blocker as New Sec is not part of 2.5 now. Removing 2.5 blocker flag.
blocking-b2g: 2.5+ → ---
tracking-b2g:
--- → backlog
Comment 3•8 years ago
|
||
Paul, seems B2G specific as well, can we close this one or no?
Flags: needinfo?(ptheriault)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•8 years ago
|
||
The same as bug 1179060. Even if we plan to continue NSEC v2, signed package would no longer be an option. No reason so work on this bug.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(ptheriault)
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ethan Tseng [:ethan] from comment #4) > No reason so work on this bug. ^^ typo. No reason to work on this bug.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•