Closed
Bug 1191855
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
incorrect default size of <iframe> in vertical writing mode
Categories
(Core :: Layout: Images, Video, and HTML Frames, defect)
Core
Layout: Images, Video, and HTML Frames
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla43
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox43 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: jfkthame, Assigned: jfkthame)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
7.41 KB,
patch
|
dholbert
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
In horizontal writing mode, the default size of an <iframe> in the absence of any constraints or explicit sizing properties is 300px x 150px, according to the CSS 2.1 sizing rules.[1,2]
In vertical writing modes, we reinterpret these rules so that "width" becomes inline-size, and "height" becomes block-size, so the <iframe> ends up at 150px wide x 300px high. I suspect this is wrong, although it's not clear to me from the Writing Modes spec[3] which way it should be handled. I've posted to www-style[4] hoping for clarification.
Assuming there's agreement that the <iframe> default size should remain physical (which I think makes sense *unless* we were to also propagate the vertical writing mode to its contents), we'll need to fix our implementation to respect this.
The reftest reference files writing-mode/abspos/1183431-orthogonal-modes-5-ref.html and writing-mode/abspos/1183431-orthogonal-modes-6-ref.html will then need to be updated, as they are currently designed to work with our existing behavior where writing-mode *does* affect the default sizing of <iframe>.
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visudet.html#inline-replaced-width
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visudet.html#inline-replaced-height
[3] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-writing-modes-3/#abstract-layout
[4] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0049.html
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Based on the exchange on www-style, I think we should go ahead and do this to align our behavior to the other browsers, and assume the spec will be clarified accordingly.
Attachment #8644958 -
Flags: review?(dholbert)
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → jfkthame
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8644958 [details] [diff] [review]
Make the intrinsic size of <iframe> remain physical 300x150, regardless of writing mode
Review of attachment 8644958 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Looks good. Thanks!
Attachment #8644958 -
Flags: review?(dholbert) → review+
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
(This behavior -- sticking to physical 300x150 -- is consistent with other replaced elements, right?)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
url: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/96d67fd3c056d89346bb5760e902a67dbe700b98
changeset: 96d67fd3c056d89346bb5760e902a67dbe700b98
user: Jonathan Kew <jkew@mozilla.com>
date: Wed Aug 12 11:02:02 2015 +0100
description:
Bug 1191855 - Make the intrinsic size of <iframe> remain physical 300x150, regardless of writing mode. r=dholbert
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Daniel Holbert [:dholbert] from comment #4)
> (This behavior -- sticking to physical 300x150 -- is consistent with other
> replaced elements, right?)
Yes; e.g. <video> keeps its landscape-aspect intrinsic size unchanged even in vertical mode.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
status-firefox43:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla43
Updated•7 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
Updated•7 years ago
|
Component: Layout: HTML Frames → Layout: Images
Product: Core Graveyard → Core
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•