1199246 - WARNING: content window passed to PrivateBrowsingUtils.isWindowPrivate when running wpt tests

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 1193527

(Testing :: web-platform-tests, defect)

Description

[(no longer active)]

We get this warning once for every page we load:

 0:18.59 PROCESS_OUTPUT: ProcessReader (pid:37373) "WARNING: content window passed to PrivateBrowsingUtils.isWindowPrivate. Use isContentWindowPrivate instead (but only for frame scripts)."
 0:18.59 PROCESS_OUTPUT: ProcessReader (pid:37373) "pbu_isWindowPrivate@resource://gre/modules/PrivateBrowsingUtils.jsm:25:14"
 0:18.59 PROCESS_OUTPUT: ProcessReader (pid:37373) "nsBrowserAccess.prototype.openURI@chrome://browser/content/browser.js:15664:21"
 0:18.59 PROCESS_OUTPUT: ProcessReader (pid:37373) "__marionetteFunc@dummy file:27:30"
 0:18.59 PROCESS_OUTPUT: ProcessReader (pid:37373) "@dummy file:36:3"
 0:18.59 PROCESS_OUTPUT: ProcessReader (pid:37373) "executeWithCallback@chrome://marionette/content/listener.js:791:5"
 0:18.59 PROCESS_OUTPUT: ProcessReader (pid:37373) "executeAsyncScript@chrome://marionette/content/listener.js:665:3"

Comment 1

[(no longer active)]

Attachment: Fix a warning when passing a content window as the opener argument to nsBrowserAccess.openURI()

Comment 2

[Bill McCloskey [inactive unless it's an emergency] (:billm)]

Sorry, we both fixed this at roughly the same time.

Comment 3

[Brad Lassey [:blassey] (use needinfo?)]

Comment on attachment 8653522 [details] [diff] [review]
Fix a warning when passing a content window as the opener argument to nsBrowserAccess.openURI()

Review of attachment 8653522 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

so do we not need this patch anymore?

Comment 4

[(no longer active)]

Comment on attachment 8653522 [details] [diff] [review]
Fix a warning when passing a content window as the opener argument to nsBrowserAccess.openURI()

(In reply to Brad Lassey [:blassey] (use needinfo?) from comment #3)
> so do we not need this patch anymore?

No.