Closed Bug 1201995 Opened 7 years ago Closed 7 years ago

Rename the mozpub-track-digest256 and mozpub-trackwhite-digest256 lists


(Cloud Services :: Server: Shavar, defect)

Not set


(firefox42+ fixed, firefox43 fixed)

Tracking Status
firefox42 + fixed
firefox43 --- fixed


(Reporter: francois, Assigned: francois)




(2 files)

If we'd like to change the name of these lists so that they are more descriptive and consistent, given the new feature introduced in bug 1177085, now (before Sep 21st) would be a good time.

Suggested changes:

1. mozpub-track-digest256 -> mozstd-track-digest256
2. mozpub-trackwhite-digest256 -> mozstd-trackwhite-digest256


- both mozpub-track-digest256 and mozpub-trackwhite-digest256 must continue to be available on stage until the end of the diary study (Sep 18th)
- mozpub-track-digest256 should be available in both stage and prod until ESR 38 is EOL

My assumption is that making these changes at the same time as bug 1201741 will mean that there's not much extra work required. Is that true?

There is some amount of risk with renaming mozpub-track-digest256 in the client since that has been in production for a long time, but that should be minimal since we're keeping the old name too. The other one (mozpub-trackwhite-digest256) has never been in production.
No longer blocks: 1201741
See Also: → 1201741
Blocks: 1177085
Blocks: 1200940
Attached patch Nightly patchSplinter Review
Attachment #8661492 - Flags: review?(gpascutto)
Assignee: nobody → francois
Attached patch Aurora patchSplinter Review
Attachment #8661494 - Flags: review?(gpascutto)
[Tracking Requested - why for this release]:
Attachment #8661492 - Flags: review?(gpascutto) → review+
Attachment #8661494 - Flags: review?(gpascutto) → review+
Depends on: 1205443
No longer blocks: 1177085
Comment on attachment 8661494 [details] [diff] [review]
Aurora patch

Approval Request Comment
[Feature/regressing bug #]: TP list names have changed
[User impact if declined]: TP will be stuck on the old legacy list (whitelist won't work).
[Describe test coverage new/current, TreeHerder]: Manual tests
[Risks and why]: Low, these new list names are what we used in the end-to-end tests.
[String/UUID change made/needed]: None
Attachment #8661494 - Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Comment on attachment 8661494 [details] [diff] [review]
Aurora patch

Approved for uplift to aurora from discussion with Sylvestre and Erin
Attachment #8661494 - Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora? → approval-mozilla-aurora+
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.