Rename the mozpub-track-digest256 and mozpub-trackwhite-digest256 lists

RESOLVED FIXED

Status

Cloud Services
Server: Shavar
RESOLVED FIXED
2 years ago
2 years ago

People

(Reporter: francois, Assigned: francois)

Tracking

(Blocks: 1 bug)

unspecified
Points:
---
Dependency tree / graph

Firefox Tracking Flags

(firefox42+ fixed, firefox43 fixed)

Details

Attachments

(2 attachments)

(Assignee)

Description

2 years ago
If we'd like to change the name of these lists so that they are more descriptive and consistent, given the new feature introduced in bug 1177085, now (before Sep 21st) would be a good time.

Suggested changes:

1. mozpub-track-digest256 -> mozstd-track-digest256
2. mozpub-trackwhite-digest256 -> mozstd-trackwhite-digest256

Constraints:

- both mozpub-track-digest256 and mozpub-trackwhite-digest256 must continue to be available on stage until the end of the diary study (Sep 18th)
- mozpub-track-digest256 should be available in both stage and prod until ESR 38 is EOL

My assumption is that making these changes at the same time as bug 1201741 will mean that there's not much extra work required. Is that true?

There is some amount of risk with renaming mozpub-track-digest256 in the client since that has been in production for a long time, but that should be minimal since we're keeping the old name too. The other one (mozpub-trackwhite-digest256) has never been in production.
(Assignee)

Updated

2 years ago
No longer blocks: 1201741
See Also: → bug 1201741
(Assignee)

Updated

2 years ago
Blocks: 1177085
(Assignee)

Updated

2 years ago
Blocks: 1200940
(Assignee)

Comment 1

2 years ago
Created attachment 8661492 [details] [diff] [review]
Nightly patch
Attachment #8661492 - Flags: review?(gpascutto)
(Assignee)

Updated

2 years ago
Assignee: nobody → francois
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
(Assignee)

Comment 2

2 years ago
Created attachment 8661494 [details] [diff] [review]
Aurora patch
Attachment #8661494 - Flags: review?(gpascutto)
[Tracking Requested - why for this release]:
tracking-firefox42: --- → ?
Attachment #8661492 - Flags: review?(gpascutto) → review+
Attachment #8661494 - Flags: review?(gpascutto) → review+
status-firefox42: --- → affected
status-firefox43: --- → affected
(Assignee)

Comment 4

2 years ago
Nightly: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=faaaad79ffa5
Aurora: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=99c3d86ab612

Updated

2 years ago
Depends on: 1205443
(Assignee)

Updated

2 years ago
No longer blocks: 1177085
tracking-firefox42: ? → +

Comment 5

2 years ago
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/fx-team/rev/f5b92efafc4a
(Assignee)

Comment 6

2 years ago
Comment on attachment 8661494 [details] [diff] [review]
Aurora patch

Approval Request Comment
[Feature/regressing bug #]: TP list names have changed
[User impact if declined]: TP will be stuck on the old legacy list (whitelist won't work).
[Describe test coverage new/current, TreeHerder]: Manual tests
[Risks and why]: Low, these new list names are what we used in the end-to-end tests.
[String/UUID change made/needed]: None
Attachment #8661494 - Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Comment on attachment 8661494 [details] [diff] [review]
Aurora patch

Approved for uplift to aurora from discussion with Sylvestre and Erin
Attachment #8661494 - Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora? → approval-mozilla-aurora+
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/3f07b3124d9c
status-firefox42: affected → fixed
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/f5b92efafc4a
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 2 years ago
status-firefox43: affected → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.