Closed
Bug 1202206
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
The bottom tile row on the New Tab Page is truncated
Categories
(Firefox :: New Tab Page, defect)
Firefox
New Tab Page
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 1180387
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox40 | --- | unaffected |
firefox41 | --- | unaffected |
firefox42 | --- | affected |
firefox43 | --- | affected |
People
(Reporter: cpeterson, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(1 file)
513.67 KB,
image/jpeg
|
Details |
[Tracking Requested - why for this release]:
This is a regression in Aurora 42 and Nightly 43 from bug 1180387.
Aurora 42 and Nightly 43 show three rows of tiles on the about:newtab page, but the bottom row is cut off. I am using a MacBook Pro with a 13" Retina display, which is pretty small and only two tile rows can fit without being cut off.
I bisected this regression to bug 1180387. Bug 1194895 fixed a related regression, where an extra row of empty tiles caused a vertical scroll bar, but in my user profile the tiles in the extra row are not empty.
Please see the attached screenshot.
Flags: needinfo?(mzhilyaev)
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
Chris,
I am a bit confused about "the bottom row is cut off". Do you mean that the third row is not fully visible? Or do you mean that there's a forth row that you have expected to be accessible, but you can't scroll down to it, because we never show it?
Could you please clarify.
Flags: needinfo?(cpeterson)
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
Chris, also note that seeing a scroll bar when a bottom row does not completely fit into your view port and has non-empty tiles is actually the intended behavior that bug 1194895 introduced to address users' issues listed in 1180387.
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to maxim zhilyaev from comment #1)
> I am a bit confused about "the bottom row is cut off". Do you mean that the
> third row is not fully visible? Or do you mean that there's a forth row
> that you have expected to be accessible, but you can't scroll down to it,
> because we never show it?
The third row is not fully visible. The attached screenshot has a picture. There is no fourth row.
Flags: needinfo?(cpeterson)
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Chris Peterson [:cpeterson] from comment #3)
> The third row is not fully visible. The attached screenshot has a picture.
> There is no fourth row.
This is the expected behavior. If the row contains history tiles and does not fit into the screen, we show what's visible and place a scroll bar to access what's hidden.
You can take a look at the cause of tile height increase: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1180387#c24
and various decisions proposed here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1180387#c32
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
OK. Thanks for the links to the design discussion in bug 1180387.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(mzhilyaev)
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Updated•9 years ago
|
tracking-firefox42:
? → ---
tracking-firefox43:
? → ---
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•