We basically don't implement the "tooLong" validity state thing at all. There's a TODO comment in the code pointing to bug 613016 and bug 613019. The latter seems like a prerequisite for the behavior this bug is asking for.
Depends on: 613019
(In reply to Boris Zbarsky [:bz] from comment #1) > We basically don't implement the "tooLong" validity state thing at all. Well, you do implement it insofar as the property exists (with a constant value of `false`) rather than being `undefined`, which makes trying to feature-detect proper support for `.tooLong` more trouble than it's worth. > The latter [bug 613019] seems like a prerequisite for the behavior this bug is asking for. Agreed.
This bug should be fixed now that bug 613019 just landed.
Indeed. Test passes in current Nightly.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 2 years ago
status-firefox51: --- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
See Also: → bug 613019
Do we have tests for this?
Yes, a test for this was added as part of bug 613019. See https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/e2bb8f329f10/dom/html/test/test_bug613019.html
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.