Open
Bug 1204423
Opened 9 years ago
Updated 2 years ago
JPG image color incorrectly displayed with gfx.color_management.enablev4 enabled.
Categories
(Core :: Graphics: Color Management, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
NEW
People
(Reporter: timbugzilla, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Whiteboard: [gfx-noted])
Attachments
(4 files)
Some JPG images are rendered with blue/magenta colors when gfx.color_management.enablev4 is enabled
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
The has been confirmed at mozillazine's forums: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=14326907#p14326907 Example images are here (and are attached): http://i.onionstatic.com/avclub/5555/02/16x9/1200.jpg https://uproxx.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/ew-cover-1373-xmen_612x3801.jpg?w=975&h=606
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Version: unspecified → Trunk
Updated•9 years ago
|
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
Both images render correctly for me. Win7 x64, Firefox 40.0.3, ATI graphics and having run through the "calibrate color" wizard of the Windows control panel to set up color correction properly.
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
I'm on Windows 7 x64, running the 2015-09-13 64-bit Nightly on an Nvidia GeForce GTX 580. I also see this with the color profile for my monitor, but not with the "sRGB IEC61966-2.1" profile included in Windows, or with the profile I made recently for my TV. There must be something special about the profiles on which this shows up - perhaps they're non-standard or corrupt (I made the one for my monitor a long time ago, on an older version of ArgyllCMS). I don't trust my profile very far, so I'll give others a chance to attach their profiles first.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Yes, having a profile where this happens would be useful.
Whiteboard: [gfx-noted]
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
Here's the profile I have that shows the problem. There's almost certainly something non-standard about it that's causing the problem - I think at the time I had changed a few parameters in the ArgyllCMS source code to increase the LUT resolution. That may be causing it to be rejected by Firefox, but I don't know why that would cause the problem seen in this bug. I still had the profiling results lying around, so I created a new profile from them using the latest ArgyllCMS (1.8.2), and it doesn't show the problem. But I think the issue with this profile is more likely caused by a change I made than by a bug in ArgyllCMS.
Updated•7 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P3
here my ICCv4 profile where you can see the test picture in very dark blue using FF, all other browsers and programs working fine with it. Done with X-rite colormunki and their i1studio v1.0 software which can't make ICCv2 profiles anymore. With older colormunki photo v1.2.4 software you could change between v4 (same not working as well) and v2 profiles which had no problems at all. Load it and you will see the upper part of the test picture in dark blue: http://www.color.org/version4html.xalter As far as I can say it may be related to the use of LUT and matrix in the profile.
Updated•2 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•