Closed Bug 120444 Opened 23 years ago Closed 23 years ago

packager/packages-unix does not contain libgfxxprint.so for Xprint

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: Installer, defect, P3)

All
Linux
defect

Tracking

(Not tracked)

VERIFIED FIXED
mozilla0.9.8

People

(Reporter: masaki.katakai, Assigned: roland.mainz)

References

Details

Attachments

(2 files)

I found xpinstall does not contain libgfxxprint.so. Why? Now, the module is built by default and we have good printing diloag so we should put it to the list. Roland, can you work on this? http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/xpinstall/packager/packages-unix
Severity: normal → blocker
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
OS: Windows 2000 → Linux
Priority: -- → P3
Hardware: PC → All
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla0.9.9
Over to XPInstall packages...
Assignee: Roland.Mainz → syd
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Component: Printing: Xprint → Installer: XPI Packages
QA Contact: Roland.Mainz → ktrina
Summary: packager/packages-unix does not contain libgfxxprint.so for XPrint → packager/packages-unix does not contain libgfxxprint.so for Xprint
Taking...
Assignee: syd → Roland.Mainz
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Requesting r=/sr= ...
Keywords: patch, review
I think we need this for 0.9.8, too...
Target Milestone: mozilla0.9.9 → mozilla0.9.8
Comment on attachment 65425 [details] [diff] [review] Patch for 2002-01-14-08-trunk sr=jst
Attachment #65425 - Flags: superreview+
r=mcafee, make sure to test this and make sure it works.
a=blizzard on behalf of drivers for 0.9.8
Keywords: mozilla0.9.8+
I saw a checkin comment that referenced this bug: "01/18/2002 07:07timeless%mac.com mozilla/ xpinstall/ packager/ packages-unix 1.190 1/0 Bug 120444 packager/packages-unix does not contain libgfxxprint.so for Xprint patch by Roland.Mainz@informatik.med.uni-giessen.de r=mcafee sr=jst a=blizzard" Is this bug fixed? If so can it be resolved to pull it off the "0.9.8 outstanding" list? Thanks.
Yes, the patch has been checked-in yesterday ... ... marking bug as FIXED.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
On startup with 2002-01-19-06 on Linux I see this: nsNativeComponentLoader: SelfRegisterDll(/home/andre/apps/mozilla/components/libgfxxprint.so) Load FAILED with error: libxlibrgb.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory ************************************************** I'm guessing this checkin is related?
Correction: I only got this error on the first automatic start after installing from the -sea build, not on later starts.
André Dahlqvist wrote: > On startup with 2002-01-19-06 on Linux I see this: > nsNativeComponentLoader: > SelfRegisterDll(/home/andre/apps/mozilla/components/libgfxxprint.so) Load > FAILED > with error: libxlibrgb.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or > directory > ************************************************** > > I'm guessing this checkin is related? Uhm... _YES_. Looks I forgot to add libxlibrgb.so ... xx@@!!... ;-( > Correction: I only got this error on the first automatic start after > installing > from the -sea build, not on later starts. That's correct. During the st start of mozilla all components are loaded for xpcom registration - but after component.reg has been created the components are only loaded on demand.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Status: REOPENED → ASSIGNED
With the patch in attachment 65773 [details] [diff] [review] applied I didn't get this error message on first startup with my CVS build.
André Dahlqvist wrote: > With the patch in attachment 65773 [details] [diff] [review] applied I didn't get this error message on > first startup with my CVS build. Care to give me an r= ? :)
Comment on attachment 65773 [details] [diff] [review] 2nd attempt to get this working - patch for 2002-01-17-08-trunk r=andre
Comment on attachment 65773 [details] [diff] [review] 2nd attempt to get this working - patch for 2002-01-17-08-trunk sr=jag
Attachment #65773 - Flags: superreview+
Attachment #65773 - Flags: review+
If we want this one for 0.9.8 we need to get in though with drivers. Roland, will you do it or should I?
André Dahlqvist wrote: > If we want this one for 0.9.8 we need to get in though with drivers. Roland, > will you do it or should I? I already emailed drivers (subject='Requesting a= for 2nd patch in bug 120444 (packager/packages-unix does not contain libgfxxprint.so for Xprint")', date='Sun, 20 Jan 2002 07:39:16 +0100', msgid='<3C4A6614.FE1D300A@informatik.med.uni-giessen.de>') and asked dbaron on IRC ... he said "later" ... AFAIK I cannot do more than this... ;-(
a=asa (on behalf of drivers) for checkin.
Fix checked in, marking bug as FIXED (again).
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago23 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
*** Bug 123107 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Verified code fix
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
Component: Installer: XPI Packages → Installer
QA Contact: ktrina → general
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: