Closed
Bug 1205571
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Clean up local data validation tool for publishing it to a broader audience
Categories
(Toolkit :: Telemetry, defect, P1)
Toolkit
Telemetry
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox43 | --- | affected |
People
(Reporter: gfritzsche, Assigned: gfritzsche)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [unifiedTelemetry] [data-validation][measurement:client])
We want to extend the local data validation tools usage [0] to at least fx-team to gather more data.
For this we should clean it up a little:
* make it clear where/how to share data with us and the privacy treatment
* remove, hide or explain any flagging of data issues that we are not concerned about right now
0: https://gist.github.com/georgf/1b0831a6b81b6c9fe240
Updated•9 years ago
|
Points: --- → 2
Priority: -- → P1
Whiteboard: [unifiedTelemetry] [data-validation] → [unifiedTelemetry] [data-validation][measurement:client]
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → gfritzsche
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
* moved the validation tool from a gist to a proper repo: https://github.com/georgf/v2v4-validation/
* added preliminary overview & data submission text
* added descriptions for each relevant data section
* hid measurements we are currently not focused on behind a SHOW_EXTENDED flag
How does that look so far?
Katie, Mark, Thomas?
Flags: needinfo?(thuelbert)
Flags: needinfo?(mreid)
Flags: needinfo?(kparlante)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
Closing here, the question on whether we still want to ask a broader set of people to run this can be cleared up elsewhere.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(thuelbert)
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•