Closed
Bug 1209961
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
(Gaia RTL 2.5) back & forward icons
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Shared, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
FxOS-S10 (30Oct)
People
(Reporter: kaze, Assigned: autra, NeedInfo)
References
Details
Attachments
(14 files)
53 bytes,
text/x-github-pull-request
|
wilsonpage
:
review+
|
Details | Review |
55 bytes,
text/x-github-pull-request
|
wilsonpage
:
review+
|
Details | Review |
54 bytes,
text/x-github-pull-request
|
wilsonpage
:
review+
|
Details | Review |
57 bytes,
text/x-github-pull-request
|
wilsonpage
:
review+
|
Details | Review |
52 bytes,
text/x-github-pull-request
|
wilsonpage
:
review+
|
Details | Review |
54 bytes,
text/x-github-pull-request
|
wilsonpage
:
review+
|
Details | Review |
57 bytes,
text/x-github-pull-request
|
Details | Review | |
54 bytes,
text/x-github-pull-request
|
wilsonpage
:
review+
|
Details | Review |
53 bytes,
text/x-github-pull-request
|
julienw
:
review+
|
Details | Review |
53 bytes,
text/x-github-pull-request
|
wilsonpage
:
review+
|
Details | Review |
54 bytes,
text/x-github-pull-request
|
wilsonpage
:
review+
|
Details | Review |
53 bytes,
text/x-github-pull-request
|
wilsonpage
:
review+
|
Details | Review |
53 bytes,
text/x-github-pull-request
|
wilsonpage
:
review+
|
Details | Review |
46 bytes,
text/x-github-pull-request
|
wilsonpage
:
review+
|
Details | Review |
Currently, the icon font used in Gaia uses “back” and “forward” to describe left and right arrows, respectively. This is confusing and adds unnecessary complexity to our stylesheets.
I suggest that in the icon font:
• we rename “back” and “back-light” as “left” and “left-light”
• we rename “forward” and “forward-light” as “right” and “right-light”
and in the gaia-icons.css stylesheet, we add two specific cases:
• [data-icon="back"] uses “left” in LTR, “right” in RTL
• [data-icon="forward"] uses “right” in LTR, “left” in RTL
Thus, we could remove all direction-specific rules in our web components, building blocks and application stylesheets for these back & forward icons.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
I forgot to mention the link:
http://gaia-components.github.io/gaia-icons/
Component: Gaia → Gaia::Shared
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
While we’re at it, I suggest that all “mirrorable” icons should have a “-left” and “right” counterpart, to avoid a rather expensive `transform: scaleX(-1)` for RTL.
I think it would only affect the “send” and “expand” icons. Ahmed, do you see other icons in that case?
Again, we’d add specific rules to gaia-icons.css so that [data-icon="send"] uses “send-right” in LTR and “send-left” in RTL by default.
Flags: needinfo?(nefzaoui)
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
Pavel, Wilson, WDYT? If you patch the icon font, I’ll submit the patches to fix the stylesheets.
Reporter | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Blocks: CSS_Refactor_2.5
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
I'm happy with the naming change, but don't want to make generic global style rules. In the past this has been super confusing. Also these selectors won't penetrate into shadow-dom, so won't take affect any way.
Whenever we're using icons in shadow-dom we have to redefine the [data-icon] {} selector.
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
+1 for Wilson's comment
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → augustin.trancart
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
Here is the first part of the bug. I'm opening PR to the affected gaia-components then to gaia soon
Attachment #8669632 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage)
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8669632 [details] [review]
PR to gaia-icons
https://github.com/gaia-components/gaia-icons/commit/54be8b948087fe62dd2d31a269ef835060fe174e
Attachment #8669632 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage) → review+
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•9 years ago
|
||
Hey Wilson, here is the update of gaia-button. Please r?
Attachment #8669865 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage)
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•9 years ago
|
||
Here is the one for gaia-dialog
Attachment #8669885 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage)
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8669901 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage)
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•9 years ago
|
||
Here is the PR for gaia-list
Attachment #8669917 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage)
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•9 years ago
|
||
For gaia-toolbar.
Attachment #8670137 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage)
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8669865 -
Attachment description: Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/gaia-components/gaia-checkbox/pull/7 → Link to Github pull-request (gaia-toolbar)
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8669865 -
Attachment description: Link to Github pull-request (gaia-toolbar) → Link to Github pull-request (gaia-checkbox)
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8669901 -
Attachment description: Link to Github pull-request for gaia-text-input → Link to Github pull-request (gaia-text-input)
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8669917 -
Attachment description: Link to Github pull-request: gaia-list → Link to Github pull-request (gaia-list)
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•9 years ago
|
||
So I've done a search on every repo of gaia-components, and it seems that only these need updating + gaia-header. I know some work are still is progress for it, so I'll wait for it to land.
Now, I need to check:
- the gaia-icons version number in /shared/bower.json
- the gaia-icons directory in /shared/elements/ (what should I do with it? Just copy the relevant files here?)
- all building blocks in /shared/styles that may use gaia-icons.
- all apps in /apps, /dev_apps and /tv_apps that may use gaia-icons
Do you see something else to do?
Flags: needinfo?(wilsonpage)
Comment 15•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Augustin Trancart [:autra] from comment #14)
> So I've done a search on every repo of gaia-components, and it seems that
> only these need updating + gaia-header. I know some work are still is
> progress for it, so I'll wait for it to land.
>
> Now, I need to check:
> - the gaia-icons version number in /shared/bower.json
> - the gaia-icons directory in /shared/elements/ (what should I do with it?
> Just copy the relevant files here?)
1. Update "gaia-icons" version in shared/bower.json
2. `cd shared/`
3. `bower update gaia-icons`
> - all building blocks in /shared/styles that may use gaia-icons.
> - all apps in /apps, /dev_apps and /tv_apps that may use gaia-icons
>
> Do you see something else to do?
Seems good to me!
Flags: needinfo?(wilsonpage)
Comment 16•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8669865 [details] [review]
Link to Github pull-request (gaia-checkbox)
https://github.com/gaia-components/gaia-checkbox/releases/tag/v0.1.1
Attachment #8669865 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage) → review+
Comment 17•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8669901 [details] [review]
Link to Github pull-request (gaia-text-input)
https://github.com/gaia-components/gaia-text-input/releases/tag/v0.1.4
Attachment #8669901 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage) → review+
Comment 18•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8670137 [details] [review]
Link to Github pull-request (gaia-toolbar)
https://github.com/gaia-components/gaia-toolbar/commit/474aab785d3899ae27eb08d165c7ab7799cb0c8f
Attachment #8670137 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage) → review+
Comment 19•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8669885 [details] [review]
Link to Github pull-request (gaia-dialog)
Just a simple linting failure to fix, then we can merge.
Attachment #8669885 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage) → review+
Comment 20•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8669917 [details] [review]
Link to Github pull-request (gaia-list)
One little nit, then we can merge :)
Attachment #8669917 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 21•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8669917 [details] [review]
Link to Github pull-request (gaia-list)
Hi Wilson,
Flipping r? again, because I forgot to fix test/stress.html in my last commit. Thanks!
Attachment #8669917 -
Flags: review+ → review?(wilsonpage)
Assignee | ||
Comment 22•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Wilson Page [:wilsonpage] from comment #19)
> Comment on attachment 8669885 [details] [review]
> Link to Github pull-request (gaia-dialog)
>
> Just a simple linting failure to fix, then we can merge.
I don't understand it, seems a jshint fail to me. Should we exclude it?
(Note that this was already failing before my patch, a quick bisection shows the culprit is 122f01706bb72e532dc3f9a6f979a9ed9f49e6ae)
Flags: needinfo?(wilsonpage)
Assignee | ||
Comment 23•9 years ago
|
||
I forgot to bump the version of gaia-fast-list. Please r? :-)
Attachment #8670707 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage)
Assignee | ||
Comment 24•9 years ago
|
||
While I'm at it, better update the example of gaia-button as well. Please r?
Attachment #8670720 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage)
Comment 25•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8669917 [details] [review]
Link to Github pull-request (gaia-list)
https://github.com/gaia-components/gaia-list/releases/tag/v0.2.2
Attachment #8669917 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage) → review+
Comment 26•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Augustin Trancart [:autra] from comment #22)
> (In reply to Wilson Page [:wilsonpage] from comment #19)
> > Comment on attachment 8669885 [details] [review]
> > Link to Github pull-request (gaia-dialog)
> >
> > Just a simple linting failure to fix, then we can merge.
>
> I don't understand it, seems a jshint fail to me. Should we exclude it?
>
> (Note that this was already failing before my patch, a quick bisection shows
> the culprit is 122f01706bb72e532dc3f9a6f979a9ed9f49e6ae)
We can add this [1] to the .jshintrc.
[1] https://github.com/gaia-components/gaia-fast-list/blob/master/.jshintrc#L34
Flags: needinfo?(wilsonpage)
Comment 27•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8670720 [details] [review]
Link to Github pull-request: (gaia-button)
https://github.com/gaia-components/gaia-button/commit/9cb0419c17014bb4662e82910593f8c8039a61c0
Attachment #8670720 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage) → review+
Reporter | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 28•9 years ago
|
||
Hey Wilson,
I'm currently making the changes to gaia to adapt the new version of gaia-icons, and I would like us to give Kaze's proposal a second thought: could we add BiDi-proof [data-icon="back"] and [data-icon="forward"] rules directly to gaia-icons ? And similarly, other BiDi-proof rules for every mirrored icons?
I know you were against this, but IMO these general rules were confusing because of their poor semantic (you were pointing at the "general scaleX(-1) for *all* icons in RTL" rule we had for a while, right?). Here, this won't be the case, because these back and forward would be semantically correct, both in RTL and LTR. Moreover, we target specifically mirrored icons. I really think there won't be any confusion.
Another advantage: this is far less risky and would yield a far smaller patch on gaia, as things would be transparent for most - if not all - of bb and apps. For the web components that has already landed, I would be able to remove all these specific rules that clutters their CSS. They are all identical across them anyway. Otherwise, we need to patch basically 3 levels of dependency (web components, building blocks and apps that use gaia-icons directly), where we could patch only one.
Attachment #8671809 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage)
Assignee | ||
Comment 29•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8671809 [details] [review]
Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/gaia-components/gaia-icons/pull/51
Also asking feedback to Julien. WDYT of having mirrored icons in gaia-icons directly?
Attachment #8671809 -
Flags: feedback?(felash)
Comment 30•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8671809 [details] [review]
Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/gaia-components/gaia-icons/pull/51
Nice! Tiny formatting nit, then we can land :)
Attachment #8671809 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage) → review+
Comment 31•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8671809 [details] [review]
Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/gaia-components/gaia-icons/pull/51
We discussed about it IRL and on IRC. I like the idea of having "logical" icons. Not sure of the best way to implement this, I don't think the performance impact would be that big because the selectors are quite simple.
But I also had a look at the OpenType specification. It looks like we can do mirroring directly within the font. See http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/TTOCHAP1.htm#ltrrtl (look for "Glyph-level mirroring").
So maybe it's possible to "simply" embed this information in the font: "ok, these glyphs need to be mirrored when we're in RTL context".
Jonathan, you likely know better than me here... What do you think ?
Flags: needinfo?(jfkthame)
Attachment #8671809 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage)
Attachment #8671809 -
Flags: review+
Attachment #8671809 -
Flags: feedback?(felash)
Comment 32•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8671809 [details] [review]
Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/gaia-components/gaia-icons/pull/51
sorry, flipped wilson's r+. But please wait for Jonathan's answer before merging...
Attachment #8671809 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage) → review+
Comment 33•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Julien Wajsberg [:julienw] from comment #32)
> Comment on attachment 8671809 [details] [review]
> Link to Github pull-request:
> https://github.com/gaia-components/gaia-icons/pull/51
>
> sorry, flipped wilson's r+. But please wait for Jonathan's answer before
> merging...
Oooops I just merged and then saw this comment. Sorry!
We'll see what Johnathon says and followup if there is a smarter solution :)
Comment 34•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8671809 [details] [review]
Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/gaia-components/gaia-icons/pull/51
https://github.com/gaia-components/gaia-icons/releases/tag/v0.10.3
Assignee | ||
Comment 35•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8671894 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage)
Comment 36•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8671894 [details] [review]
Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/gaia-components/gaia-icons/pull/52
This isn't essential, but thanks :)
Attachment #8671894 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 37•9 years ago
|
||
Here is the patch for gaia-header.
What's still missing:
- patch for gaia
- undo some of the css changes of the web components, now that we have a back and forward in gaia-icons.
Attachment #8671916 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage)
Comment 38•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Julien Wajsberg [:julienw] from comment #31)
> Comment on attachment 8671809 [details] [review]
> Link to Github pull-request:
> https://github.com/gaia-components/gaia-icons/pull/51
>
> We discussed about it IRL and on IRC. I like the idea of having "logical"
> icons. Not sure of the best way to implement this, I don't think the
> performance impact would be that big because the selectors are quite simple.
>
> But I also had a look at the OpenType specification. It looks like we can do
> mirroring directly within the font. See
> http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/TTOCHAP1.htm#ltrrtl (look for
> "Glyph-level mirroring").
>
> So maybe it's possible to "simply" embed this information in the font: "ok,
> these glyphs need to be mirrored when we're in RTL context".
>
> Jonathan, you likely know better than me here... What do you think ?
Yes, an OpenType solution would be a possibility. What you'd want to do is to provide an extra "reversed" glyph in the font for each icon that should be direction-sensitive, and then use the 'rtlm' feature to replace the default (LTR) glyph with its RTL counterpart.
This would be a lighter-weight approach than the CSS rules, as it doesn't involve any extra selector-matching. The font is already going through OpenType feature processing; adding one extra simple substitution feature to the font means there'll be one more lookup to process during text shaping, but that's pretty cheap -- and the result will be cached by the font's shaped-word cache, reducing the cost still further.
If you want to go this way, I guess the icons should be named things like arrow-forward and arrow-back (rather than arrow-right and arrow-left). Actually, you'd perhaps want to have both logically- and physically-named icons in the font, with mirroring applied only to the logical ones; then in any given context the designer can choose whether a particular icon should be physical or logical.
Flags: needinfo?(jfkthame)
Assignee | ||
Comment 39•9 years ago
|
||
I really like Jonathan solution, but I'm not knowledgeable enough to do this correctly yet :-) I suggest to open a follow-up, and I'll try to give it a shot later if nobody else shows up. Does anybody have pointers to help me understand how to use this 'rtlm' feature?
Moreover, it seems that grunt-webfont does not support this (or I didn't find out how), which might slow us down. If this statement is correct, we would need to either propose this feature to grunt-webfont, or move away from it...
Assignee | ||
Comment 40•9 years ago
|
||
Hey Wilson, could you release a new version of gaia-header? I need it to make a patch to gaia to update gaia-icons, gaia-list gaia-header at the same time, in order not to break anything :-) Thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(wilsonpage)
Comment 41•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8671916 [details] [review]
Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/gaia-components/gaia-header/pull/47
https://github.com/gaia-components/gaia-header/releases/tag/v0.9.5
Attachment #8671916 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage) → review+
Updated•9 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(wilsonpage)
Comment 42•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8670707 [details] [review]
Link to Github pull-request (gaia-fast-list)
Travis tests failing
Attachment #8670707 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage)
Assignee | ||
Comment 43•9 years ago
|
||
Another advantage of using rtlm in the font: mirroring would also work when using `content:` directly in css. There's a few cases where people do that (when they want the arrow in :after for ex).
Comment 44•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Augustin Trancart [:autra] from comment #43)
> Another advantage of using rtlm in the font: mirroring would also work when
> using `content:` directly in css. There's a few cases where people do that
> (when they want the arrow in :after for ex).
Perhaps, though I wonder if the need to apply bidi-override to it could sometimes make that tricky.
I believe you'd be able to do, for example:
foo:after { content: "arrow-forward"; font-family: gaia-icons; unicode-bidi: bidi-override; }
and mirroring of the arrow should work; but if the 'content:' contains other text in addition to the icon, applying bidi-override to it might be more problematic.
Comment 45•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Augustin Trancart [:autra] from comment #39)
> I really like Jonathan solution, but I'm not knowledgeable enough to do this
> correctly yet :-) I suggest to open a follow-up, and I'll try to give it a
> shot later if nobody else shows up. Does anybody have pointers to help me
> understand how to use this 'rtlm' feature?
>
> Moreover, it seems that grunt-webfont does not support this (or I didn't
> find out how), which might slow us down. If this statement is correct, we
> would need to either propose this feature to grunt-webfont, or move away
> from it...
I think the first step would be to make it work with fontforge without grunt... But I don't have a clue ;)
Assignee | ||
Comment 46•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jonathan Kew (:jfkthame) from comment #44)
>
> Perhaps, though I wonder if the need to apply bidi-override to it could
> sometimes make that tricky.
Why would you apply bidi-override? If you don't want the outer direction to be applied, wouldn't it be an indication to use either `arrow-left` or `arrow-right` instead?
Comment 47•9 years ago
|
||
Unless I'm misunderstanding something, I believe you'll always need to use bidi-override in order to get the icon to be treated as an RTL text run (when it's in a context with dir=rtl).
Otherwise, the fact that the icon name -- which is what's used as the text "content" to access it -- consists of strong LTR characters will mean that it becomes an LTR text run regardless of the directionality of its container.
I.e. if you have something along the lines of
<div dir=rtl>
الخط العربي <span class="icon">arrow-forward</span>
</div>
the <span> will be a LTR text run because of the Unicode directionality of its contents, and so any 'rtlm' feature would NOT be applied. To make the <span> override the properties of its contents, and force it to adopt RTL directionality, it needs to be styled with "unicode-bidi: bidi-override".
Comment 48•9 years ago
|
||
The other thing I notice, after a little experimentation, is that it doesn't actually work to use ligatures like this with bidi overrides. :( So things are a bit messier than I'd been assuming, if you do want to use those ligatures. In effect, you'd need a second set of ligature rules with the strings entered backwards: i.e. you'd have a ligature named 'arrow-forward' rendering the right-pointing arrow for LTR content, and one named 'drawkcab-worra' for RTL content. In which case that ligature might as well go directly to the left-pointing arrow, and there's no need for a mirroring feature.
Or do the gaia apps use the individual PUA codepoints to access the icons? (I see that the glyphs in gaia-icons.ttf are encoded BOTH as ligatures and as PUA character codes.) If that's the case, 'rtlm' can indeed be used to swap in mirrored glyphs.
Comment 49•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jonathan Kew (:jfkthame) from comment #48)
> you'd have a ligature named 'arrow-forward'
> rendering the right-pointing arrow for LTR content, and one named
> 'drawkcab-worra' for RTL content
Uh, I meant 'drawrof-worra' here, of course.
Assignee | ||
Comment 50•9 years ago
|
||
Hi Wilson, while making the gaia patch, I realized I forgot the "send" icon in the bidi-helper.css :-( Sorry for that!
Please r?
Attachment #8672773 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage)
Comment 51•9 years ago
|
||
I think we'll investigate the in-font solution later than 2.5. Augustin, will you please file a separate bug, and add that bug # as a comment near your added CSS ?
Assignee | ||
Comment 52•9 years ago
|
||
So this PR adds the comment. Hopefully, this will be the last one for gaia-icons for this bug! Wilson, please r?
Attachment #8672977 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage)
Comment 53•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8672773 [details] [review]
Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/gaia-components/gaia-icons/pull/53
https://github.com/gaia-components/gaia-icons/releases/tag/v0.10.4
Attachment #8672773 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage) → review+
Comment 54•9 years ago
|
||
Comment 55•9 years ago
|
||
Don't forget to file a separate bug for the in-font mirroring experience.
Assignee | ||
Comment 56•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8673163 [details] [review]
[gaia] Phoxygen:bug1209961-update_gaia_icons > mozilla-b2g:master
Hey Wilson, here is the last one. Please r?
Attachment #8673163 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage)
Assignee | ||
Comment 57•9 years ago
|
||
Julien, already done in bug 1214127 :-)
Comment 58•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8673163 [details] [review]
[gaia] Phoxygen:bug1209961-update_gaia_icons > mozilla-b2g:master
Please update gaia-icons and gaia-header inside apps/camera too. Make sure the gaia-icons version installed by Bower *exactly* matches the one in shared/elements/gaia-icons.
Cheers!
Attachment #8673163 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage)
Comment 59•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8672977 [details] [review]
Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/gaia-components/gaia-icons/pull/54
https://github.com/gaia-components/gaia-icons/commit/2dc46ac2e2c44dbe3036dab91c9128d056bd186e
Attachment #8672977 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 60•9 years ago
|
||
> Please update gaia-icons and gaia-header inside apps/camera too
There's 4 major versions to update for gaia-header and it breaks stuff, unfortunately (especially the "take picture" button). Can we open a follow-up for that? I'd rather land this one quickly, as it potentially blocks other RTL works.
> Make sure the gaia-icons version installed by Bower *exactly* matches the one in shared/elements/gaia-icons.
Should be ok now :-)
Thanks
Flags: needinfo?(wilsonpage)
Comment 61•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8673163 [details] [review]
[gaia] Phoxygen:bug1209961-update_gaia_icons > mozilla-b2g:master
Code looks good, assuming you have tested on device :)
Flags: needinfo?(wilsonpage)
Attachment #8673163 -
Flags: review+
Comment 62•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8673163 [details] [review]
[gaia] Phoxygen:bug1209961-update_gaia_icons > mozilla-b2g:master
autra: Please update to gaia-icons v0.10.5 to fix a FOUC issue we were having. See bug 1175805.
Attachment #8673163 -
Flags: review+
Updated•9 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(augustin.trancart)
Assignee | ||
Comment 63•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8673163 [details] [review]
[gaia] Phoxygen:bug1209961-update_gaia_icons > mozilla-b2g:master
Done, updated to 0.10.5
Flags: needinfo?(augustin.trancart)
Attachment #8673163 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage)
Comment 64•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8673163 [details] [review]
[gaia] Phoxygen:bug1209961-update_gaia_icons > mozilla-b2g:master
Perfect, thanks! :D
Attachment #8673163 -
Flags: review?(wilsonpage) → review+
Comment 66•9 years ago
|
||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Keywords: checkin-needed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → FxOS-S10 (30Oct)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•