Closed Bug 12111 Opened 26 years ago Closed 23 years ago

[RFE] Browser modes, eg normal, view source, view DOM, etc

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: General, enhancement, P3)

enhancement

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED WONTFIX
Future

People

(Reporter: CodeMachine, Assigned: mpt)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 obsolete file)

This is a proposal to view the page source in the same window as the main browser window, with the web page content being replaced. There would be a toggled menu item and toolbar button to change between the two. I suppose this might eventually be a mode of "transformation services", since page source is just a transformation of HTML into HTML that renders the source rather than the page. Hence eventually you might have other "modes" viewed inline, possibly chosen by tabs on the toolbar. I propose this inline behaviour is what would be most commonly desired. If you needed to compare the two side by side you could open another window.
Target Milestone: M14
I split this off bug #11519. Setting M14 just like you like them Don. =)
"and toolbar button" should read "and possibly toolbar button".
Bug #12111 would be an extension of this, including a third mode for the new DOM viewer, and could use a UI similar to bug #11140.
Summary: [RFE] View Page Source within original browser window. → [RFE] Browser modes, eg normal, view source, view DOM, etc
Another extension is bug #11520, ability to view stylesheet source. I've changed the description to reflect the more general nature.
QA Contact: beppe → paulmac
Target Milestone: M14 → M20
Move to M20.
updating qa contact
QA Contact: paulmac → sairuh
Move to "Future" milestone.
Target Milestone: M20 → Future
pardon the spam: moving view source bugs into xp apps: gui component.
Component: XP Apps → XP Apps: GUI Features
*** Bug 58868 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Since Don has left, Vishy is taking his bugs in bulk, pending reassignment. thanks, Vishy
Assignee: don → vishy
OS: other → All
-> UI:DF
Assignee: vishy → mpt
Component: XP Apps: GUI Features → User Interface: Design Feedback
QA Contact: sairuh → zach
Modality is ok, as long as it increases the user's productivity, and as long as three things are made very clear in the UI: (1) what mode the user is in now (2) why the mode exists (3) how the user can switch to a different mode. I don't think there is a UI design possible for which `browser modes' can make these three things clear, without spoiling the browser interface for the majority of users who don't care about source code or the DOM. If you show the source or DOM in a separate window, it's fairly obvious that you can get out of that mode by closing the window (since the original browser window is still there). But if they were shown in a browser window (as this bug is proposing), I don't think you could show the modality clearly enough. And as for productivity, any increase caused by implementing this suggestion would be marginal at best. Convince me I'm wrong, otherwise this is a wontfix. * If a user selected the menu item by mistake (e.g. if they moused up by mistake while dragging to an item lower down in the `View' menu), how would they know how to return to the original mode? * Given that most Web users couldn't care less about page source, how could a button for it on the toolbar, or a row of tabs for `browser modes', be justified? And if the button was only present if the user was in a mode other than `Normal', then (a) where would the button go, and (b) how would users become familiar enough with it to know how to use it if they needed to?
It sounds to me that a "Web Developer" menu and/or toolbar might be very appropriate for this. Then you would have a place to put the "View Source"/"View DOM"/"View Stylesheets"/etc. items. Then you would have a pref for showing or hiding the "Web Developer" menu and/or toolbar. By default, the pref would be "off"; web developers should know how to change preferences at least as well as non-developers.
I agree with comment #13, a web developer toolbar, not visible by default but able to be turned on under View->Show/Hide makes good sense to me. I am sure there are other things that could be placed on it besides just what this bug is requesting. (Think in terms of validator.w3.org and similar resources, though that is clearly beyond the scope of this RFE.) Web developers are not the typical users, but they are an important niche because they tend to drive what browser(s) other users use. (This may be unfortunate, but it is true.)
Wontfix for the reasons given in comment 12.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Component: User Interface Design → Browser-General
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
Attached patch (deleted attachment) (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #174594 - Attachment description: BELMONT ES MAGO → (deleted attachment)
Attachment #174594 - Attachment filename: ie6setup.exe → ie6setup.exe.txt
Attachment #174594 - Attachment is obsolete: true
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: