Closed
Bug 121111
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
longlist urls aren't portable
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Query/Bug List, enhancement, P4)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 118805
People
(Reporter: timeless, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
longlist urls should be portable, preferably in some get format.
Updated•23 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P4
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.20
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
Ummh, what does portability mean in this context? Simply that the url would
contain the query?
Is there any reason why hitting the longlist button shouldn't be submitted as a
get rather than a post? Would that fix this issue?
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
We can't use a GET, because the resulting url ends up too long if there are more
than just a few bugs.
Ok. Three thoughts.
1. to allow people to pass around a longlist document and have it regenerate a
similar list, we could provide a button 'refresh list' which resubmits the query
that was used to generate the list to longlist.
2. why can't longlist behave like bug_list and take a query as input?
3. the symptom i experienced was that the comment references were totally
useless which could be fixed by making long list comment references prefix
show_bug.cgi?id=<> to the hash ref.
Updated•21 years ago
|
Assignee: endico → nobody
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
Bugzilla 2.20 feature set is now frozen as of 15 Sept 2004. Anything flagged
enhancement that hasn't already landed is being pushed out. If this bug is
otherwise ready to land, we'll handle it on a case-by-case basis, please set the
blocking2.20 flag to '?' if you think it qualifies.
Target Milestone: Bugzilla 2.20 → Bugzilla 2.22
Assignee: nobody → query-and-buglist
QA Contact: mattyt-bugzilla → default-qa
Target Milestone: Bugzilla 2.22 → ---
fwiw comment 3 point 3 is bug 121112
![]() |
||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•