1213864 - Flame Nightly broken on 2.2 and 2.2r

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Release Engineering :: General, defect)

Description

[Carsten Book [:Tomcat]]

https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=170650&repo=mozilla-b2g37_v2_2

very_patch_intermediates/recovery_from_boot.p maxsize=385363968 blocksize=135168 total=246707038 reserve=3919872
 05:00:59     INFO -  Generating FOTA update package
 05:00:59     INFO -  mkdir -p `dirname out/target/product/flame/fota/partial/update.zip` || true
 05:01:03     INFO -  Error: java is required to be on your PATH for signing
 05:01:03     INFO -  make: *** [out/target/product/flame/fota/partial/update.zip] Error 1

Comment 1

[Carsten Book [:Tomcat]]

catlee: is this something for you ?

Comment 2

[Chris AtLee [:catlee]]

https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/9ccd468f27bd needs to land on those branches.

Comment 3

[Carsten Book [:Tomcat]]

josh,  mahe, can i get approval for 2.2 and 2.2r for this change ?

Comment 4

[Mahendra Potharaju [:mahe]]

Please land it on 2.2R.

Also, can you please tell what broke 2.2 as well?

Comment 5

[Carsten Book [:Tomcat]]

(In reply to Mahendra Potharaju [:mahe] from comment #4)
> Please land it on 2.2R.
> 
> Also, can you please tell what broke 2.2 as well?


oh i think releng added java to flame-kk builds so this broke then 2.2 and 2.2r and in order to unbreak 2.2 we need to uplift this (catlee i think thats right or ?

Comment 6

[Carsten Book [:Tomcat]]

https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g37_v2_2/rev/6b4e563acaf9 to unbreak 2.2

Comment 7

[Carsten Book [:Tomcat]]

catlee seems 2.2. and 2.2r have problems to find updates now - https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=172146&repo=mozilla-b2g37_v2_2 is this known or does this need another fix ?

Comment 8

[Chris AtLee [:catlee]]

Do we need FOTA on flame for 2.2/2.2r? Or is OTA still sufficient?

Comment 9

[Carsten Book [:Tomcat]]

(In reply to Chris AtLee [:catlee] from comment #8)
> Do we need FOTA on flame for 2.2/2.2r? Or is OTA still sufficient?

mahe, joe ? :)

Comment 10

[Carsten Book [:Tomcat]]

(In reply to Carsten Book [:Tomcat] from comment #9)
> (In reply to Chris AtLee [:catlee] from comment #8)
> > Do we need FOTA on flame for 2.2/2.2r? Or is OTA still sufficient?
> 
> mahe, joe ? :)

s/joe/josh of course

Comment 11

[Naoki Hirata :nhirata (please use needinfo instead of cc)]

so 2.5 bloated to the point where we cannot OTA normally due to a bunch of changes / additions (such as vaani in gecko and the RTL in gaia).  That is why we switched over to FOTA as more or less out of necessity.

2.2 should be good with OTA on the flame device and we should not have to move to FOTA for 2.2 nor 2.2r.
To note : flame devices will not be using 2.2r.

Comment 12

[Mahendra Potharaju [:mahe]]

Thanks Naoki. 

Clearing NI.

Comment 13

[Josh Cheng [:josh]]

Agree with Nzoki and also notify Wesley EPM of 2.2r.

Comment 14

[Chris AtLee [:catlee]]

Attachment: revert b2g 2.2 to OTA updates for flame

Comment 15

[Release Engineering SlaveAPI Service]

In production: https://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/rev/276ee6c6b060

Comment 16

[Naoki Hirata :nhirata (please use needinfo instead of cc)]

I think I was mistaken. Flame 2.2r builds are being made.  In any cases, we should be fine with just OTA with 2.2r as well.

Comment 17

[Chris AtLee [:catlee]]

Attachment: revert b2g 2.2r to OTA updates for flame

Comment 18

[Release Engineering SlaveAPI Service]

In production: https://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/rev/4afe6faac38f