Closed Bug 1219504 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago

Modernize some browser-chrome tests

Categories

(Firefox :: General, defect)

34 Branch
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
Firefox 45
Tracking Status
firefox45 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: billm, Assigned: billm)

References

Details

Attachments

(34 files, 1 obsolete file)

2.26 KB, patch
mconley
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
999 bytes, patch
mconley
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
7.29 KB, patch
mconley
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
1.65 KB, patch
mconley
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
3.25 KB, patch
Gijs
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
1.18 KB, patch
Gijs
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
5.22 KB, patch
mconley
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
6.35 KB, patch
Gijs
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
2.40 KB, patch
Gijs
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
1.43 KB, patch
Gijs
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
1.71 KB, patch
Gijs
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
4.86 KB, patch
Gijs
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
5.14 KB, patch
jryans
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
1.33 KB, patch
Gijs
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
1.11 KB, patch
Gijs
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
1.79 KB, patch
Gijs
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
1.52 KB, patch
Gijs
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
1.22 KB, patch
Gijs
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
1.55 KB, patch
Gijs
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
1.29 KB, patch
Gijs
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
1.58 KB, patch
Gijs
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
1.56 KB, patch
MattN
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
1.62 KB, patch
MattN
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
1.30 KB, patch
MattN
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
1.21 KB, patch
MattN
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
2.81 KB, patch
Gijs
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
3.72 KB, patch
Gijs
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
3.32 KB, patch
Gijs
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
7.42 KB, patch
mossop
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
1.28 KB, patch
Gijs
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
1.54 KB, patch
Gijs
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
13.24 KB, patch
MattN
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
2.84 KB, patch
Gijs
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
1.04 KB, patch
Gijs
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
This bug covers some work I've been doing to eliminate CPOWs from some browser-chrome tests. I started working on this for bug 967873, but it's generally useful stuff since we always want to reduce our use of CPOWs. So I'm putting it in a separate bug.
This patch extends BrowserTestUtils.browserLoaded so that you can decide whether a particular load is of interest to you.
Attachment #8680350 - Flags: review?(mconley)
This simply allows you to use |this| inside a ContentTask. Basically it means you can add event listeners to the frame script global, which is really useful.
Attachment #8680352 - Flags: review?(mconley)
This patch is a little gross but very useful. It allows you to use ok(), is(), and info() inside a ContentTask. It makes it a lot easier to convert existing tests to use ContentTask.
Attachment #8680353 - Flags: review?(mconley)
For the remaining patches I don't have much to say...
Attachment #8680354 - Flags: review?(mconley)
Attachment #8680375 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8680375 - Flags: review?(MattN+bmo)
This test just barely exceeds the 90 second limit with my changes. Looking at runs over the past couple days, it's just under 90 seconds.
Attachment #8680391 - Flags: review?(mconley)
Attachment #8680374 - Flags: review?(MattN+bmo) → review+
Attachment #8680376 - Flags: review?(MattN+bmo) → review+
Attachment #8680377 - Flags: review?(MattN+bmo) → review+
Attachment #8680378 - Flags: review?(MattN+bmo) → review+
Comment on attachment 8680350 [details] [diff] [review] 01 BrowserTestUtils 1 Review of attachment 8680350 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- r=me with doc update. ::: testing/mochitest/BrowserTestUtils/BrowserTestUtils.jsm @@ +146,3 @@ > * > * @return {Promise} > * @resolves When a load event is triggered for the browser. You'll need to also update this to mention that it resolves to the url of the page that loaded.
Attachment #8680350 - Flags: review?(mconley) → review+
Attachment #8680369 - Flags: review?(gijskruitbosch+bugs) → review+
Attachment #8680370 - Flags: review?(gijskruitbosch+bugs) → review+
Attachment #8680371 - Flags: review?(gijskruitbosch+bugs) → review+
Attachment #8680372 - Flags: review?(gijskruitbosch+bugs) → review+
Attachment #8680380 - Flags: review?(mconley) → review+
Attachment #8680381 - Flags: review?(mconley) → review+
Comment on attachment 8680382 [details] [diff] [review] 28 Fix browser_force_refresh.js Review of attachment 8680382 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: dom/workers/test/serviceworkers/browser_force_refresh.js @@ +42,3 @@ > var cachedLoad = false; > > + function eventHandler(msg) { Nit: this is still called eventHandler, but it is really a messageHandler, so it should probably be called that. You could avoid the s/event/msg.data/ changes in the function body by defining the function as: function messageHandler({data: event}) because none of the other fields are used. Up to you whether you think that's worth it / clearer.
Attachment #8680382 - Flags: review?(mconley) → review+
Attachment #8680365 - Flags: review?(jmathies) → review+
Comment on attachment 8680366 [details] [diff] [review] 15 Fix browser_URLBarSetURI.js Review of attachment 8680366 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: browser/base/content/test/general/browser_URLBarSetURI.js @@ -74,1 @@ > info("Tab loaded"); This means this info() will now only happen for the load we're interested in, instead of for every load. I don't think that's bad, because it didn't log the "other" URL that got loaded either, so it probably wasn't super useful to begin with.
Attachment #8680366 - Flags: review?(jmathies) → review+
Comment on attachment 8680367 [details] [diff] [review] 16 Fix browser_bug329212.js Review of attachment 8680367 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- s/Fox/Fix/ in the commit message, though maybe you'll squash/fold the commits anyway? :-)
Attachment #8680367 - Flags: review?(jmathies) → review+
Attachment #8680368 - Flags: review?(jmathies) → review+
Attachment #8680385 - Flags: review?(mrbkap) → review+
Attachment #8680386 - Flags: review?(dtownsend) → review+
Attachment #8680389 - Flags: review?(mrbkap) → review+
Attachment #8680391 - Flags: review?(mconley) → review+
Attachment #8680362 - Flags: review?(mrbkap) → review+
Attachment #8680361 - Flags: review?(mrbkap) → review+
Comment on attachment 8680360 [details] [diff] [review] 10 Fix browser_popupUI.js Review of attachment 8680360 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: browser/base/content/test/general/browser_popupUI.js @@ +2,5 @@ > waitForExplicitFinish(); > gPrefService.setBoolPref("dom.disable_open_during_load", false); > > var browser = gBrowser.selectedBrowser; > + BrowserTestUtils.browserLoaded(browser).then(() => { Nit: might as well nix the browser = gBrowser.selectedBrowser assignment and use it directly, here and below.
Attachment #8680360 - Flags: review?(mrbkap) → review+
Comment on attachment 8680359 [details] [diff] [review] 09 Fix browser_findbarClose.js Review of attachment 8680359 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: browser/base/content/test/general/browser_findbarClose.js @@ +9,1 @@ > waitForExplicitFinish(); You don't need waitForExplicitFinish() inside add_task. @@ +21,5 @@ > + yield new ContentTask.spawn(newTab.linkedBrowser, null, function* () { > + let iframe = content.document.getElementById("iframe"); > + let promise = ContentTaskUtils.waitForEvent(iframe, "load", false); > + iframe.src = "http://example.org/"; > + yield promise; You could just return the promise here, right? @@ +29,5 @@ > "subdocument changes"); > > gFindBar.close(); > gBrowser.removeTab(newTab); > finish(); Likewise, you don't need finish() here.
Attachment #8680359 - Flags: review?(mrbkap) → review+
Attachment #8680358 - Flags: review?(felipc) → review+
Attachment #8680356 - Flags: review?(felipc) → review+
Comment on attachment 8680350 [details] [diff] [review] 01 BrowserTestUtils 1 Review of attachment 8680350 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: testing/mochitest/BrowserTestUtils/BrowserTestUtils.jsm @@ +150,5 @@ > + browserLoaded(browser, includeSubFrames=false, wantLoad=null) { > + function isWanted(url) { > + if (!wantLoad) { > + return true; > + } else if (typeof(wantLoad) == "function") { Driveby nit because I had to look at this for the other reviews: please don't use else after a return.
Attachment #8680355 - Flags: review?(felipc) → review+
Comment on attachment 8680387 [details] [diff] [review] 33 Fix passwordmgr Review of attachment 8680387 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for doing this! I wish we would modernize tests more often. mozreview makes it much easier to review code movement and indentation changes btw.
Attachment #8680387 - Flags: review?(MattN+bmo) → review+
Comment on attachment 8680383 [details] [diff] [review] 30 Fix xpinstall tests Review of attachment 8680383 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Nice, thanks.
Attachment #8680383 - Flags: review?(dtownsend) → review+
Attachment #8680352 - Flags: review?(mconley) → review+
Comment on attachment 8680353 [details] [diff] [review] 03 content-task 2 Review of attachment 8680353 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for adding these!
Attachment #8680353 - Flags: review?(mconley) → review+
Attachment #8680354 - Flags: review?(mconley) → review+
Comment on attachment 8680357 [details] [diff] [review] 07 Fix browser_bug676619.js Mike, I think Felipe is a TRIBE. Would you mind looking at this one?
Attachment #8680357 - Flags: review?(felipc) → review?(mconley)
Comment on attachment 8680357 [details] [diff] [review] 07 Fix browser_bug676619.js Review of attachment 8680357 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for getting this test off CPOWs. Might be nice to put a bullet in this thing and write a new add_task'y test someday, but today is not that day.
Attachment #8680357 - Flags: review?(mconley) → review+
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 45
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: