Closed
Bug 1223800
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Increase Beta BHR threshold
Categories
(Toolkit :: Telemetry, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla45
People
(Reporter: poiru, Assigned: chutten)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
984 bytes,
patch
|
vladan
:
review+
ritu
:
approval-mozilla-aurora+
ritu
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
BHR is enabled on ~1% of the population, but the total number of BHR pings/clients is about 1/10th of Aurora pings/clients. We should increase the threshold to account for this.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
Here is the analysis: https://gist.github.com/poiru/5b160327227de16f126c
This is about beta BHR, by the way.
Summary: Increase BHR threshold → Increase Beta BHR threshold
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
Good catch, we'll need this for the Beta A/B experiment
Blocks: 1222894, e10s-measurement
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
trypush underway: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=c03328d1cbe5
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
I've been advised that I was overbroad in my tryjob, so here's the new one: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=d54597cdde94
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8687305 -
Flags: review?(rvitillo) → review?(vladan.bugzilla)
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8687305 -
Flags: review?(vladan.bugzilla) → review+
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8687305 [details] [diff] [review]
0001-bug-1223800-Accept-BHR-reports-from-50-of-beta-clien.patch
Approval Request Comment
[Feature/regressing bug #]: None
[User impact if declined]: We need this for an E10S A/B experiment on Beta 43, in order to understand differences in e10s & non-e10s performance.
[Describe test coverage new/current, TreeHerder]: local testing, treeherder
[Risks and why]: Telemetry pings will be larger (this is ok, cleared with Telemetry backend people). BHR is already enabled on 100% of Aurora & Nightly users without any problems.
[String/UUID change made/needed]: None
Attachment #8687305 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #8687305 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
Marking affected for the branches where we intend to uplift; I'll check back to make sure this lands
status-firefox43:
--- → affected
status-firefox44:
--- → affected
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
Uplifted based on a+ via email
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/76f747a03e69
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta/rev/aaa5100e2085
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 9•9 years ago
|
||
This still needs to land on m-c, but it seems ok so far on the other branches. Tomcat, sorry to bug you, does this still need the checkin-needed flag or would you catch it automatically ?
Flags: needinfo?(cbook)
Comment 10•9 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g44_v2_5/rev/76f747a03e69
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g44_v2_5/rev/f23bb8c457e0
status-b2g-v2.5:
--- → fixed
Comment 11•9 years ago
|
||
This bug was be fixed only when it will land in m-c.
We use the tracking flags instead for m-b & m-a.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 12•9 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago → 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla45
Comment on attachment 8687305 [details] [diff] [review]
0001-bug-1223800-Accept-BHR-reports-from-50-of-beta-clien.patch
Updating the flags, Vladan has already landed the patches if I understand correctly.
Attachment #8687305 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #8687305 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta+
Attachment #8687305 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Attachment #8687305 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora+
Comment 14•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ritu Kothari (:ritu) from comment #13)
> Comment on attachment 8687305 [details] [diff] [review]
> 0001-bug-1223800-Accept-BHR-reports-from-50-of-beta-clien.patch
>
> Updating the flags, Vladan has already landed the patches if I understand
> correctly.
yeah via comment #8
Flags: needinfo?(cbook)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•