Closed Bug 1228158 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago

Add support for setting alert summary status and linking to bugs

Categories

(Tree Management :: Perfherder, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: wlach, Assigned: wlach)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

47 bytes, text/x-github-pull-request
jmaher
: review+
Details | Review
For performance sheriffing, we need to be able to link performance alert summaries to bugs as well as set their status to different values (e.g. investigating or wontfix). This bug will track the implementation of a first draft of this functionality.
(repasting from dupe bug) Based on conversations we've had earlier, I'd like to start with the following possibilities: Untriaged Won't fix Resolved Backed out Invalid Investigating Duplicate We may need to change this later, but this seems like a good working set to start with. For simplicity, I'm going to add the ability to set (or unset) an alert summary's status to "invalid" (for the case that perfherder generates invalid alerts).
Blocks: 1201154
Attached file PR
This is pretty limited: it just allows you to set an alert as "invalid" if its status is "untriaged". If it's "invalid", you can set it back to "untriaged". Other stuff will be built on this. :)
Assignee: nobody → wlachance
Attachment #8699221 - Flags: review?(jmaher)
Comment on attachment 8699221 [details] [review] PR On further thought/discussion, I'm not sure if the alert summary level is the right place to set status. I think it might be preferable to do that on the level of the individual alert. Going to try reworking things that way, cancelling for now.
Attachment #8699221 - Flags: review?(jmaher)
Comment on attachment 8699221 [details] [review] PR Ok, here's an updated PR which lets you set bug #'s, invalid status, etc. on a per-alert level. I think it works pretty well for a first draft. Obviously this needs refinement but I'd rather get something basic done and play around with it. Let me know what you think!
Attachment #8699221 - Flags: review?(jmaher)
Comment on attachment 8699221 [details] [review] PR a few questions and I would like to have additional bugs on file with appropriate comments in the code to handle bug filing and other modifications to the alerts (outside of summary and bug).
Attachment #8699221 - Flags: review?(jmaher) → review+
Filed bug 1234320 as a followup for the bug filing.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: