Closed
Bug 1228735
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Flash plugin crash rate doubled on 43beta on windows 7 since 2015-11-23
Categories
(Firefox :: Untriaged, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 1227221
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox42 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox43 | --- | affected |
| firefox44 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox45 | --- | unaffected |
People
(Reporter: philipp, Unassigned)
Details
(Keywords: crash)
Crash Data
This bug was filed from the Socorro interface and is
report bp-07498fc5-bfc6-493e-a94c-d982f2151123.
=============================================================
[Tracking Requested - why for this release]:
something very curious is going on with the plugin crash rate on firefox beta 43 at the moment - on the crash graph at https://crash-analysis.mozilla.com/rkaiser/crash-report-tools/longtermgraph/?fxbeta it can be observed that the plugin crash rate doubled from 0.9% to 0.17% on 2015-11-23. nothing comparable happened on any other channel.
looking further into the matter it seems that this rise is solely attributable to an increase in flash crashes on windows 7 and it looks unrelated to the plugin hang in flash 20 beta that was brought up in the last channel meeting (bug 1227221).
this phenomenon can be best observed by looking at the graph for the signature npswf32_16_0_0_228.dll@0x35acbd which had a baseline of near zero before november 23rd:
https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/signature/?date=>2015-11-01&version=43.0b&signature=npswf32_16_0_0_228.dll%400x35acbd#graphs
the distribution of crashing flash plugin versions changed dramatically since then. in the week before november 23rd they looked what you'd expect them to be (capped at a 100 crashes per week):
Plugin version facet Rank Plugin version Count %
1 19.0.0.245 5617 54.18 %
2 20.0.0.214 2342 22.59 %
3 19.0.0.226 632 6.10 %
4 20.0.0.203 387 3.73 %
5 19.0.0.185 104 1.00 %
https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/search/?product=Firefox&version=43.0b&date=%3C%3D2015-11-22&date=%3E2015-11-14&platform_pretty_version=%3DWindows+7&plugin_name=Shockwave+Flash&_facets=signature&_facets=user_comments&_facets=version&_facets=plugin_version&_columns=date&_columns=signature&_columns=product&_columns=version&_columns=build_id&_columns=platform#facet-plugin_version
...whereas since then they have changed to include loads of very outdated versions:
Rank Plugin version Count %
*1 19.0.0.245 5741 29.84 %
2 16.0.0.228 3055 15.88 %
*3 20.0.0.214 2006 10.43 %
4 16.0.0.287 1067 5.55 %
5 18.0.0.107 1051 5.46 %
*6 19.0.0.226 808 4.20 %
7 18.0.0.232 676 3.51 %
8 20.0.0.231 598 3.11 %
9 18.0.0.209 563 2.93 %
*10 19.0.0.185 537 2.79 %
11 19.0.0.207 277 1.44 %
12 16.0.0.305 273 1.42 %
13 17.0.0.169 226 1.17 %
14 17.0.0.188 219 1.14 %
15 18.0.0.129 171 0.89 %
16 20.0.0.229 149 0.77 %
17 19.0.0.162 139 0.72 %
18 17.0.0.134 129 0.67 %
19 18.0.0.194 124 0.64 %
20 19.0.0.219 118 0.61 %
https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/search/?product=Firefox&platform_pretty_version=%3DWindows+7&version=43.0b&plugin_name=Shockwave+Flash&date=%3E%3D2015-11-23&_facets=signature&_facets=user_comments&_facets=version&_facets=plugin_version&_columns=date&_columns=signature&_columns=product&_columns=version&_columns=build_id&_columns=platform#facet-plugin_version
i'm at a loss to explain what's going on there. the most affected beta 43.0b4 was already released for nearly a week before this huge rise happened on november 23 and i know of no other events that day that could influence the plugin crash rate that noticably and only on beta...
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
Jeromie, do you have any insights on your end as to why this might be happening? Perhaps a deobfuscated crash stack might be of use here...
Flags: needinfo?(jeclark)
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Yeah, we've in touch with Mozilla at an engineering level since last week about this. See 1227221 for more details.
While we're still investigating, at this point, we believe that this is related to the Tab Muting feature introduced in Firefox 42. We had added APIs specifically for NPAPI Flash Player in Safari in our Quint release, but it looks like they also got picked up in Firefox; however, we didn't know about that until the issues started rolling in.
We're continuing to investigate, but that's the working theory, and we'll hopefully have that proved out today. If that's the case, we're probably going to disable those APIs outside of Safari for the moment, and then look at explicitly adding support for Firefox in a controlled, well-tested way.
Flags: needinfo?(jeclark)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•