Closed
Bug 1230672
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Add support for column layout on <fieldset>
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect, P3)
Core
Layout
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla46
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox46 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: MatsPalmgren_bugz, Assigned: MatsPalmgren_bugz)
References
Details
Attachments
(4 files, 1 obsolete file)
873 bytes,
patch
|
bzbarsky
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
4.49 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
7.67 KB,
patch
|
bzbarsky
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
4.04 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
No description provided.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
As I was writing reftests for <fieldset> with column layout I found this existing bug. I'll fix it here since it's just a one-liner.
Attachment #8696061 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8696290 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8696292 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=135a129fd954
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8696290 [details] [diff] [review] part 1 - Make '-moz-column-fill:auto' work also when 'overflow' isn't 'visible'. r=me
Attachment #8696290 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky) → review+
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8696292 [details] [diff] [review] part 3 - Add support for multicol layout on <fieldset> elements. r=me, though the code duplication with ConstructBlock is a bit unfortunate.
Attachment #8696292 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky) → review+
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/d9526d5d49b4 https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/950b5292fc5c https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/82bb82a9b038 https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/708e6a7b11e5
Comment 10•9 years ago
|
||
Backed out just the part 2 reftest changes in https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/eec861bce6d4, because we like to set you up to fail by not running either OS X 10.10 or WinXP tests on try unless you beg for them, and 10.10 didn't like the reftest change, https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=18587815&repo=mozilla-inbound Your trychooser patch's hint is out of date, what you want in the current era to get all desktop reftests is "reftest[Ubuntu,10.6,10.10,Windows XP,Windows 7,Windows 8]".
Comment 11•9 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/d9526d5d49b4 https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/82bb82a9b038 https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/708e6a7b11e5
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
status-firefox46:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla46
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Phil Ringnalda (:philor) from comment #10) > Backed out just the part 2 reftest changes in Thanks philor. > we like to set you up to fail by not running either OS X 10.10 or WinXP > tests on try unless you beg for them, Yeah, I really wish our tools could be smarter here. Like if the push contains changes to a reftest, or changes code under layout/ or gfx/ then "-p all" really means "-p every-single-platform-we-run-reftests-on". > Your trychooser patch's hint is out of date, what you want in the current > era to get all desktop reftests is "reftest[Ubuntu,10.6,10.10,Windows > XP,Windows 7,Windows 8]". What I usually want is all platforms we run reftests on, including Android, B2G, e10s variations etc. I don't have time keep track of which platform/test-suite combinations we run because that changes quite often, so I really wish there was new keyword for this, or if Try itself could be smarter about "all" as I said above.
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•9 years ago
|
||
The reftest failures on OSX 10.10 are anti-aliasing differences. Adding fuzzyness for victory here: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=78dc347c00b0
Comment 14•9 years ago
|
||
Crap, I forgot about bug 1231995, until that's fixed you aren't actually going to get 10.10 reftest on try, just use m-i as your tryserver.
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•9 years ago
|
||
Thanks, I was a little puzzled why I didn't get any 10.10 runs there... I retriggered a few manually, maybe that works.
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Flags: in-testsuite+
Part 2 backed out in https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/f3131740bb5d because the reftest.list syntax is apparently wrong: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=18613469&repo=mozilla-inbound
Flags: needinfo?(mats)
Flags: in-testsuite?
Flags: in-testsuite+
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•9 years ago
|
||
Looks green on 10.10 now.
Flags: needinfo?(mats)
Flags: in-testsuite?
Flags: in-testsuite+
Comment 20•9 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/8af23e77ba02
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•