Closed Bug 1246109 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago

[Static Analysis][Big parameter passed by value] In function IonBuilder::restartLoop

Categories

(Core :: JavaScript Engine: JIT, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla47
Tracking Status
firefox47 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: andi, Assigned: andi)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

(Keywords: coverity, Whiteboard: CID 1123207)

Attachments

(2 files, 1 obsolete file)

The Static Analysis tool Coverity added state is passed as value, because it has around 140bytes we can consider passing it as const reference.
Attachment #8716230 - Flags: review?(jdemooij)
Comment on attachment 8716230 [details] [diff] [review] pass state as reference instead of pass by value Review of attachment 8716230 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Good find, thanks! Ideally we'd also delete CFGState's assignment operator and copy constructor, so the compiler will complain next time this happens: CFGState(const CFGState& other) = delete; void operator=(const CFGState& other) = delete; But that will probably fail to compile without other changes (I think CFGState::IfElse and friends rely on C++ Return Value Optimization..) This patch looks good either way. ::: js/src/jit/IonBuilder.h @@ +316,5 @@ > bool maybeAddOsrTypeBarriers(); > > // Restarts processing of a loop if the type information at its header was > // incomplete. > + ControlStatus restartLoop(const CFGState &state); Nit: & goes after the type: const CFGState& state Also in the cpp file.
Attachment #8716230 - Flags: review?(jdemooij) → review+
Attached patch Bug 1246109.diffSplinter Review
Attachment #8716230 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Thx Jan for the fast review, this is why i didn't delete the copy constructor: >>IonBuilder::CFGState >>IonBuilder::CFGState::If(jsbytecode* join, MTest* test) >>{ >> CFGState state; >> state.state = IF_TRUE; >> state.stopAt = join; >> state.branch.ifFalse = test->ifFalse(); >> state.branch.test = test; >> return state; >>} similar to every function that returns CFGState, just as you said.
Keywords: checkin-needed
With more failures coming in like https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=21176431&repo=mozilla-inbound I'm beginning to think this was the patch at fault for everything.
Hello Jan, I did some changes to my patch since it busted the build. state is a reference to cfgStack_.back so basically when this gets called: >> if (!pushLoop(state.loop.initialState, state.loop.initialStopAt, header, state.loop.osr, >> state.loop.loopHead, state.loop.initialPc, >> state.loop.bodyStart, state.loop.bodyEnd, >> state.loop.exitpc, state.loop.continuepc)) >> { >> return ControlStatus_Error; >> } state will reference the newly created object in pushLoop so basically the following would have happened: nstate.loop.condpc == state.loop.condpc nstate.loop.updatepc == state.loop.updatepc nstate.loop.updateEnd == state.loop.updateEnd having only garbage. I think the idea here is to copy the original values from state.loop.condpc, state.loop.updatepc and state.loop.updateEnd to it's counterpart from nstate;
Flags: needinfo?(bogdan.postelnicu)
Comment on attachment 8716946 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1246109 - pass state as reference instead of pass by value. r?jandem https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/33999/#review31031 ::: js/src/jit/IonBuilder.cpp:2461 (Diff revision 1) > -IonBuilder::restartLoop(CFGState state) > +IonBuilder::restartLoop(const CFGState& state) I suppose we could make this a pointer: `const CFGState* state`, and then we can do `state = nullptr;` after we pull everything we need out of it. What do you think? Patch looks good either way. ::: js/src/jit/IonBuilder.cpp:2489 (Diff revision 1) > + // keep a local copy for these pointers since state will be overwritten in Nit: s/keep/Keep/, and there's some whitespace at the end of this line.
Attachment #8716946 - Flags: review?(jdemooij) → review+
Comment on attachment 8716946 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1246109 - pass state as reference instead of pass by value. r?jandem Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/33999/diff/1-2/
Thanks for the review. If it's ok with you i prefer to leave it as it is since i think it's more readable.
Keywords: checkin-needed
(In reply to Bogdan Postelnicu from comment #13) > Thanks for the review. If it's ok with you i prefer to leave it as it is > since i think it's more readable. Sure!
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla47
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: