Closed Bug 1248979 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago

Standardize name for RDM

Categories

(DevTools :: Responsive Design Mode, defect, P1)

defect

Tracking

(firefox47 affected)

RESOLVED FIXED
Iteration:
47.2 - Feb 22
Tracking Status
firefox47 --- affected

People

(Reporter: jryans, Assigned: clarkbw)

References

Details

(Keywords: dev-doc-complete, Whiteboard: [multiviewport] [mvp-rdm])

There are many naming variants for RDM: * Bugzilla component is called "Responsive Mode", but then its own description says "Responsive View" * Toolbox command button for toggling says "Responsive Design Mode" * GCLI "resize *" command says "Responsive Design Mode" * Tools -> Web Developer menu item says "Responsive Design View" * MDN docs[1] say "Responsive Design View" Let's pick only one and update everything! :) [1]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/Responsive_Design_View
:helenvholmes / :clarkbw, any opinions on a "one true name"?
Flags: needinfo?(hholmes)
Flags: needinfo?(clarkbw)
I'm game to try a "one true name" but I'll just put out there that I think we could have two names. Internally we can use the 'Responsive Design View', but we don't necessarily have to present that text to the users. However MDN and the UI should share the same name as they are both user facing. :helenholmes, what say you?
Flags: needinfo?(clarkbw)
Adding in Arcadio to help here.
Flags: needinfo?(alainez)
Priority: -- → P3
Whiteboard: [multiviewport][triage] → [multiviewport]
(In reply to Bryan Clark (Firefox PM) [:clarkbw] from comment #2) > I'm game to try a "one true name" but I'll just put out there that I think > we could have two names. Internally we can use the 'Responsive Design View', > but we don't necessarily have to present that text to the users. However > MDN and the UI should share the same name as they are both user facing. > > :helenholmes, what say you? I find it a little confusing (being slightly newer) when we use different names internally and externally, for what that info is worth. I prefer "Responsive Design Mode", if I had to choose. I guess I vote for that? :)
Flags: needinfo?(hholmes)
Ok, I can get on board with "Responsive Design Mode" so lets go with that. Unless @alainez screams I'll start moving the the internal naming over to "mode". As we release we'll need to update the MDN and other docs to ensure consistency.
I like Responsive Design Mode! Was thinking "mode" makes it sound like we can "do" something with it whereas "view" seems more passive. The only thing I wanted to highlight is that in Chrome they refer to it as "Toggle Device mode" which would be nice for us to communicate the difference in the new RDM i.e. device and resolution selection. We'll have to hammer this point in the comms.
Flags: needinfo?(alainez)
Responsive Design Mode
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee: nobody → clarkbw
Iteration: --- → 47.2 - Feb 22
Flags: qe-verify-
Priority: P3 → P1
I've updated the main page: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/Responsive_Design_Mode and anywhere else I could find. I've left references to the menu item "Tools/Responsive Design View" (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/Responsive_Design_Mode#Enabling_and_disabling) until bug 1255120 lands.
Flags: needinfo?(clarkbw)
Sorry, I meant bug 1250120.
(In reply to Will Bamberg [:wbamberg] from comment #9) > Sorry, I meant bug 1250120. Perfect, thanks Wil!
Flags: needinfo?(clarkbw)
Whiteboard: [multiviewport] → [multiviewport] [mvp-rdm]
Product: Firefox → DevTools
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.