Closed
Bug 1249935
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Ambiguous language in documentation for btoa()
Categories
(Developer Documentation Graveyard :: General, defect, P5)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: chrisv, Assigned: sheppy)
References
()
Details
:: Developer Documentation Request
Request Type: Correction
Gecko Version: unspecified
Technical Contact:
:: Details
The 'Unicode Strings' section of the btoa() documentation has a rather vague statement "In most browsers, calling window.btoa() on a Unicode string will cause a Character Out Of Range exception".
What is meant by a 'Unicode string' is not specified. In fact, ASCII text is Unicode, and indeed ASCII text is valid UTF-8.
Naturally, with a 7-bit ASCII/Unicode string such as 'to', btoa('to') works ('dG8=').
Also, with an 8-bit ASCII/Unicode string such as 'ça', btoa('ça') works ('52E=').
Perhaps the statement should be "a multibyte Unicode string" rather than simply "a Unicode string".
With a multi-byte Unicode string such as '†' (U+2020), btoa('†') gives an InvalidCharacterError.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
I've largely rewritten the text here, based off a review of the specification. Hopefully this is less ambiguous now. :)
Assignee: nobody → eshepherd
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•