Closed Bug 1252072 Opened 4 years ago Closed 4 years ago
_Invoke By Index is incompatible with Address Sanitizer LLVM 3 .8+
58 bytes, text/x-review-board-request
XPCOM's NS_InvokeByIndex method on x86_64 makes assumptions about the stack, in particular about the behavior and alignment of __builtin_alloca that do not hold with AddressSanitizer's dynamic stack instrumentation feature turned on. This feature has been turned on by default in LLVM 3.8+. With that LLVM version, Firefox crashes on startup with stack-overflow/underflow errors. Perma-link to the problematic function: https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/5e0140b6d11821e0c2a2de25bc5431783f03380a/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/md/unix/xptcinvoke_x86_64_unix.cpp#117 I've discussed this with the ASan developers: > Yes. This code looks like a portability nightmare, and IMHO should be > deleted or rewritten in assembly as this comment suggests [...] > You can't depend on the behavior or alignment of alloca() function as this > code does, and ASan certainly changes the stack frame layout significantly. > It used to ignore alloca() calls, so you were able to get away w/o disabling > this function under ASan, but it's not expected to work appropriately. > Blacklisting it (or, better, adding __attribute__((no_sanitize("address"))) > seems like a right thing to do. I suggest adding MOZ_ASAN_BLACKLIST to this function for this and all other platforms that use __builtin_alloca for stack space. Patch coming.
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/37217/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/37217/
Attachment #8724898 - Flags: review?(nfroyd)
Comment on attachment 8724898 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1252072 - Prevent ASan instrumentation for unsafe xpcom functions. r=froydnj https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/37217/#review33763 r=me with the change below. ::: xpcom/reflect/xptcall/md/unix/xptcinvoke_linux_s390.cpp:173 (Diff revision 1) > +MOZ_ASAN_BLACKLIST All those ASan runs we do on s390... ;) ::: xpcom/reflect/xptcall/md/unix/xptcinvoke_x86_64_unix.cpp:116 (Diff revision 1) > +MOZ_ASAN_BLACKLIST If you could at least comment this particular annotation and explain why we're blacklisting this function, that would be most helpful. I don't think the other ones need annotations at this time, but if you're feeling motivated, you could comment them too.
Attachment #8724898 - Flags: review?(nfroyd) → review+
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.