Closed Bug 1252292 Opened 10 years ago Closed 9 years ago

Set up ash for e10s testing

Categories

(Release Engineering :: General, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(e10s+)

RESOLVED FIXED
Tracking Status
e10s + ---

People

(Reporter: jgriffin, Assigned: RyanVM)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

Attachments

(5 files)

We're going to set up e10s testing on all platforms on a project branch, since we don't have the capacity to add e10s tests on all trunk branches. Ash looks like a good candidate; it hasn't been used since Dec 4.
Nick, are you ok repurposing ash for this?
Flags: needinfo?(nthomas)
Yes, I forgot to relinquish it when I was done. It's been transferred over to you on the wiki.
Flags: needinfo?(nthomas)
Depends on: 1252318
Blocks: e10s-tests
tracking-e10s: --- → +
Blocks: 1253849
I've got a mostly-working patch for this.
Assignee: nobody → ryanvm
After a ridiculous amount of studying differences.txt and allthethings_with_patch.json, I'm finally convinced that I've got this all right from a logic standpoint. Please do grade me on style too, though :)
Attachment #8730032 - Flags: review?(rail)
Attached file builder diff
Depends on: 1256173
Comment on attachment 8730032 [details] [diff] [review] schedule only e10s tests across all desktop platforms on Ash Review of attachment 8730032 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- lgtm
Attachment #8730032 - Flags: review?(rail) → review+
Comment on attachment 8730032 [details] [diff] [review] schedule only e10s tests across all desktop platforms on Ash http://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/rev/8b6119cfc6a9
Attachment #8730032 - Flags: checked-in+
(In reply to Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM] from comment #8) > http://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/rev/8b6119cfc6a9 In production. Leaving the bug open until the other needed work is finished, though.
Depends on: 1256372
Ash is being considered production from a test validity and importance standpoint, so let's not leave its jobs sitting in line behind everything else.
Attachment #8730356 - Flags: review?(rail)
Attachment #8730356 - Flags: review?(rail) → review+
Attachment #8730356 - Flags: checked-in+
MozReview-Commit-ID: A7qVu8AofOC
Attachment #8732117 - Flags: review?(rail)
I'm pretty sure this code (using `branch` from a previous loop) introduced the intermittent checkconfig failures we were seeing this week.
Attachment #8732117 - Flags: review?(rail) → review+
Attachment #8732117 - Flags: checked-in+
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Depends on: 1271347
Component: General Automation → General
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: