Closed
Bug 1259550
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Outdated Plugins Adobe Acrobat PDF Plug-In Discrepancy Error
Categories
(Plugin Check Graveyard :: Database, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 1254687
People
(Reporter: Jerry_Chavez, Unassigned)
Details
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/45.0
Build ID: 20160315153207
Steps to reproduce:
"Tools > Add-ons > Plugins > Check to see if my plugins are up to date"; Discrepancy error between "Plugin Status" page reporting "Adobe Reader, Adobe PDF Plug-In For Firefox and Netscape, outdated 15.10.20056.36345" versus "Adobe Reader DC" application "Help > Check for Updates..." dialog box display "No updates available", Installed: Adobe Acrobat Reader DC (15.010.20060)".
Actual results:
"Tools > Add-ons > Plugins > Check to see if my plugins are up to date"; Discrepancy error between "Plugin Status" page reporting "Adobe Reader, Adobe PDF Plug-In For Firefox and Netscape, outdated 15.10.20056.36345" versus "Adobe Reader DC" application "Help > Check for Updates..." dialog box display "No updates available", Installed: Adobe Acrobat Reader DC (15.010.20060)".
Expected results:
There should be no discrepancy in software version number.
Updated•10 years ago
|
Component: Untriaged → Database
Product: Firefox → Plugin Check
Version: 45 Branch → unspecified
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
This looks like it could be a duplicate of either bug 1254687 or bug 1258563
... Rachel, what do you think?
See this discussion thread where both those bugs are mentioned:
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/forums/plug-check-page-discussions/711891 New Adobe Reader Security Update
Flags: needinfo?(rmcguigan)
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
It also looks like the same issue we ran into here with the Adobe Flash plugin bug 1259223 where one branch version overlapped with another branch.
There are two ways I can see going about this.
1. Staging and tracking the three branches of Adobe Acrobat Reader separately
2. Changing the UI detection
3. Changign regex - but I do not think it detects version numbers
I have resources for the 1st.
Flags: needinfo?(rmcguigan)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•