Closed Bug 1259550 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago

Outdated Plugins Adobe Acrobat PDF Plug-In Discrepancy Error

Categories

(Plugin Check Graveyard :: Database, defect)

x86_64
Windows 8.1
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 1254687

People

(Reporter: Jerry_Chavez, Unassigned)

Details

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/45.0 Build ID: 20160315153207 Steps to reproduce: "Tools > Add-ons > Plugins > Check to see if my plugins are up to date"; Discrepancy error between "Plugin Status" page reporting "Adobe Reader, Adobe PDF Plug-In For Firefox and Netscape, outdated 15.10.20056.36345" versus "Adobe Reader DC" application "Help > Check for Updates..." dialog box display "No updates available", Installed: Adobe Acrobat Reader DC (15.010.20060)". Actual results: "Tools > Add-ons > Plugins > Check to see if my plugins are up to date"; Discrepancy error between "Plugin Status" page reporting "Adobe Reader, Adobe PDF Plug-In For Firefox and Netscape, outdated 15.10.20056.36345" versus "Adobe Reader DC" application "Help > Check for Updates..." dialog box display "No updates available", Installed: Adobe Acrobat Reader DC (15.010.20060)". Expected results: There should be no discrepancy in software version number.
OS: Unspecified → Windows 8.1
Hardware: Unspecified → x86_64
Component: Untriaged → Database
Product: Firefox → Plugin Check
Version: 45 Branch → unspecified
This looks like it could be a duplicate of either bug 1254687 or bug 1258563 ... Rachel, what do you think? See this discussion thread where both those bugs are mentioned: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/forums/plug-check-page-discussions/711891 New Adobe Reader Security Update
Flags: needinfo?(rmcguigan)
It also looks like the same issue we ran into here with the Adobe Flash plugin bug 1259223 where one branch version overlapped with another branch. There are two ways I can see going about this. 1. Staging and tracking the three branches of Adobe Acrobat Reader separately 2. Changing the UI detection 3. Changign regex - but I do not think it detects version numbers I have resources for the 1st.
Flags: needinfo?(rmcguigan)
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.