Closed Bug 1271058 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago

Flash of white behind transitioning objects

Categories

(Core :: Layout, defect)

Product:
Core
Component:
Layout
Version:
48 Branch
Platform:
Unspecified
All
Type:
defect
Priority:
Not set
Severity:
normal

Tracking

()

Status:
RESOLVED FIXED
Milestone:
mozilla49
Tracking Flags:
Tracking Status
firefox47 --- unaffected
firefox48 + fixed
firefox49 + fixed

People

(Reporter: jrmuizel, Assigned: mattwoodrow)

References

Details

(Keywords: regression)

Attachments

(2 files)

2.html
3.00 KB, text/html
Details
Use effective opacity not local opacity for determining if a layer is opaque
2.23 KB, patch
mstange
: review+
Sylvestre
: approval-mozilla-aurora+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
Attached file 2.html —
When you hover over the orange square the blue rectangle doesn't fade in or out the same way as Chrome
This is a regression. It works fine in Firefox 19
Keywords: regression, regressionwindow-wanted
OS: Unspecified → Mac OS X
Looks like it was probably bug 1250718
Blocks: 1250718
Flags: needinfo?(matt.woodrow)
[Tracking Requested - why for this release]: A user visible regression from bug 1250718
tracking-firefox48: --- → ?
tracking-firefox49: --- → ?
It is black on windows10 w/ HWA. And I got a same regression window.
OS: Mac OS X → All
Assignee: nobody → matt.woodrow
Flags: needinfo?(matt.woodrow)
Comment on attachment 8750161 [details] [diff] [review] Use effective opacity not local opacity for determining if a layer is opaque Review of attachment 8750161 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Please swap the role of red and green in the test.
Attachment #8750161 - Flags: review?(mstange) → review+
Tracking for 48 and 49.
status-firefox47: --- → unaffected
tracking-firefox48: ? → +
tracking-firefox49: ? → +
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/d45ccd5d1e6e
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
status-firefox49: --- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla49
Matt, are you planning to request the uplift to 48? Thanks
status-firefox48: --- → affected
Flags: needinfo?(matt.woodrow)
Comment on attachment 8750161 [details] [diff] [review] Use effective opacity not local opacity for determining if a layer is opaque Approval Request Comment [Feature/regressing bug #]: bug 1250718 [User impact if declined]: Incorrect opacity during animations in rare cases [Describe test coverage new/current, TreeHerder]: Manually tested, reftest added [Risks and why]: Very low risk. [String/UUID change made/needed]: None
Flags: needinfo?(matt.woodrow)
Attachment #8750161 - Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Comment on attachment 8750161 [details] [diff] [review] Use effective opacity not local opacity for determining if a layer is opaque Fix a user facing regression, taking it
Attachment #8750161 - Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora? → approval-mozilla-aurora+
Version: unspecified → 48 Branch
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: