Closed
Bug 1271112
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Incorrect display long website
Categories
(Core :: Graphics, defect)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: yestok, Assigned: mstange)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(3 files)
533.99 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
1.61 MB,
application/zip
|
Details | |
58 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
jrmuizel
:
review+
Sylvestre
:
approval-mozilla-aurora+
|
Details |
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/50.0.2661.87 Safari/537.36 OPR/37.0.2178.32
Steps to reproduce:
Operating System Windows 10 Pro 64 and 32. Firefox 46.0.1 My long website https://yestok.pl/lbo/y34.php (HTML 4) and https://yestok.pl/test/y34html5.php (HTML5) are displayed incorrectly.
Actual results:
This pages does not display correctly at end of the articles. If several illustrations (or all) will not be shown then the page displays correctly. I rearranged around 30 pages and the problem appeared only on this one page. In other browsers such as Edge, Opera, and Chrome all is correct.
My further observations suggest that the problem stems from the height of the <body> object. After crossing the numerical value corresponding to a two-byte number (about 32,000) appears the problem. Artificially increased the one of the parties so as to exceed the size and the effect appeared. Global reducing the size of the font restores the correct display.
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
@reporter,
Could you paste "Graphics" section of about:support?
Flags: needinfo?(yestok)
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
[Tracking Requested - why for this release]: web layout is broken due to regression
I can reproduce the problem if HWA is disabled.
Regression window:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/pushloghtml?fromchange=50116088c244&tochange=fd797f07d0db
Regressed by: Bug 1000875
Blocks: 1000875
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
status-firefox46:
--- → affected
status-firefox47:
--- → affected
status-firefox48:
--- → affected
status-firefox49:
--- → affected
status-firefox-esr38:
--- → affected
status-firefox-esr45:
--- → affected
tracking-firefox47:
--- → ?
tracking-firefox48:
--- → ?
tracking-firefox49:
--- → ?
tracking-firefox-esr45:
--- → ?
Component: Untriaged → Graphics
Ever confirmed: true
Flags: needinfo?(yestok) → needinfo?(mstange)
Keywords: regression
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
This page has a repeating-linear-gradient as a fixed background image, so this sounds like bug 1011166 all over again.
Assignee: nobody → mstange
Flags: needinfo?(mstange)
(In reply to Alice0775 White from comment #1)
> @reporter,
> Could you paste "Graphics" section of about:support?
I have only Polish version this section.
Grafika (Graphic)
Asynchroniczne przewijanie/powiększanie: brak
Asynchronic scroll/zoom: none
Data sterownika: 3-11-2013
GPU #2 Active: false
ID dostawcy: 0x8086
ID podsystemu: 2e321849
ID urządzenia: 0x2e32
Okna ze sprzętowym przyspieszeniem grafiki: 1/1 Direct3D 11 WARP (OMTC)
Opis adaptera: Intel(R) G41 Express Chipset (Microsoft Corporation - WDDM 1.1)
Parametry ClearType: Gamma: 1800 Pixel Structure: R ClearType Level: 0 Enhanced Contrast: 300
RAM adaptera: Unknown
Renderer WebGL: Google Inc. -- ANGLE (Intel(R) G41 Express Chipset (Microsoft Corporation - WDDM 1.1) Direct3D9Ex vs_3_0 ps_3_0)
Sprzętowe dekodowanie H.264: No; Hardware video decoding disabled or blacklisted
Sterowniki adaptera: igdumd64 igd10umd64 igdumd32 igd10umd32
Wersja sterownika: 8.15.10.2702
windowLayerManagerRemote: true
Włączone Direct2D: Zablokowane dla zainstalowanej karty graficznej z powodu nierozwiązanych problemów ze sterownikiem. (Blocked for the installed graphics card because of unresolved problems with the controller.)
Włączone DirectWrite: false (10.0.10586.0)
AzureCanvasBackend: skia
AzureContentBackend: cairo
AzureFallbackCanvasBackend: cairo
AzureSkiaAccelerated: 0
Markus is right. This is the effect of background-image in long documents. I turned off the property on this site.
But the problem still exists, because in all other browsers is O.K.
Jerzy
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
Regression from Firefox 32. We are unlikely to fix this in 46 or 47. Tracking for 48/49 in hopes this is something we can fix and maybe uplift.
tracking-firefox47:
? → ---
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
While this is a regression in ESR as well, it doesn't fit the criteria for landing in ESR (major stability or security issue fixes, or major feature regressions for early ESR cycles)
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
Comment 9•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Liz Henry (:lizzard) (needinfo? me) from comment #6)
> Regression from Firefox 32. We are unlikely to fix this in 46 or 47.
> Tracking for 48/49 in hopes this is something we can fix and maybe uplift.
Actually this is not correct.
In the release channel, Regressed since Firefox33, not Firefox32.
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•9 years ago
|
||
The gradient on this website had, the float values of xdim and ydim were
about 7500, which is definitely representable by 16.16 fixed point values.
But the matrix had a large (> 32000) translation on it.
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/51721/diff/#index_header
See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/51721/
Attachment #8750971 -
Flags: review?(jmuizelaar)
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8750971 -
Flags: review?(jmuizelaar)
Comment 11•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8750971 [details]
MozReview Request: Bug 1271112 - Check transformed gradient end points for fixed point overflow, not the size of the gradient. r?jrmuizel
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/51721/#review48855
::: gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-image-surface.c:1147
(Diff revision 1)
> - _cairo_fixed_integer_ceil (ydim) > PIXMAN_MAX_INT)
> + y0 = _cairo_fixed_to_double (linear->p1.y);
> + x1 = _cairo_fixed_to_double (linear->p2.x);
> + y1 = _cairo_fixed_to_double (linear->p2.y);
> + cairo_matrix_transform_point(&matrix, &x0, &y0);
> + cairo_matrix_transform_point(&matrix, &x1, &y1);
> + maxabs = ceil (max (max (fabs (x0), fabs (x1)), max (fabs (y0), fabs (y1))));
You should be able to drop the ceil()
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8750971 [details]
MozReview Request: Bug 1271112 - Check transformed gradient end points for fixed point overflow, not the size of the gradient. r?jrmuizel
Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/51721/diff/1-2/
Attachment #8750971 -
Flags: review?(jmuizelaar)
Comment 13•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8750971 [details]
MozReview Request: Bug 1271112 - Check transformed gradient end points for fixed point overflow, not the size of the gradient. r?jrmuizel
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/51721/#review49203
Attachment #8750971 -
Flags: review?(jmuizelaar) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8750971 [details]
MozReview Request: Bug 1271112 - Check transformed gradient end points for fixed point overflow, not the size of the gradient. r?jrmuizel
Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/51721/diff/2-3/
Comment 15•9 years ago
|
||
Comment 16•9 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla49
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8750971 [details]
MozReview Request: Bug 1271112 - Check transformed gradient end points for fixed point overflow, not the size of the gradient. r?jrmuizel
Approval Request Comment
[Feature/regressing bug #]: long-standing issue with painting large gradients on certain platforms (unaccelerated Windows, Linux), made worse by bug 1000875.
[User impact if declined]: missing gradient backgrounds on long pages, overlapping text
[Describe test coverage new/current, TreeHerder]: this patch adds a test
[Risks and why]: low, just uses existing fallback in more cases
[String/UUID change made/needed]: none
Attachment #8750971 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Comment 19•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8750971 [details]
MozReview Request: Bug 1271112 - Check transformed gradient end points for fixed point overflow, not the size of the gradient. r?jrmuizel
Fix a long standing issue, taking it
Attachment #8750971 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora? → approval-mozilla-aurora+
Comment 20•8 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
Updated•5 years ago
|
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•