1271472 - Add a performance framework for servo

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Tree Management :: Perfherder, defect)

Description

[William Lachance (:wlach)]

Right now servo is submitting data to stage under "talos", but that's really just intended for gecko platform. Let's add a performance framework for servo, so things don't get mixed up.

Comment 1

[GitHub Autolander Bot]

Attachment: [treeherder] wlach:1271472 > mozilla:master

Comment 2

[William Lachance (:wlach)]

Comment on attachment 8750535 [details] [review]
[treeherder] wlach:1271472 > mozilla:master

Hi Shing, does "servo" sound ok for the name of a performance framework? If so, I'll merge this and deploy tomorrow so you can use it.

Comment 3

[Shing Lyu [:shinglyu]]

I would suggest "servo-perf", "servo" is indistinguishable from the project name. 

Thank you! :)

Comment 4

[William Lachance (:wlach)]

Comment on attachment 8750535 [details] [review]
[treeherder] wlach:1271472 > mozilla:master

Ok, servo-perf it is!

Comment 5

[Treeherder GitHub Bugbot]

Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/mozilla/treeherder

https://github.com/mozilla/treeherder/commit/0840709137b844ff6687109eb7b552206dabc4ac
Bug 1271472 - Add a performance framework for servo (#1476)

Comment 6

[Ed Morley [:emorley]]

I can't find the bug that was filed for authorising the 'servo-perf' hawk id? Is there one?

It just makes it easier to track down the owners for services, when I can do a quicksearch for eg "FIXED servo :treeherder" and have the 'Tree Management::Treeherder: API' bug come up with the original request.

(context: servo is submitting the wrong format revision SHAs, bug 1283856)

Comment 7

[William Lachance (:wlach)]

(In reply to Ed Morley [:emorley] from comment #6)
> I can't find the bug that was filed for authorising the 'servo-perf' hawk
> id? Is there one?

No, I'll make sure that we file bugs for future requests.