Closed Bug 1272763 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago

Evaluation in Browser Console/Web Console/Scratch Pad takes a long time. (decrypting with pbkdf2 algorithm).

Categories

(DevTools :: Console, defect)

x86
Windows 10
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(firefox49- fix-optional)

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 793345
Tracking Status
firefox49 - fix-optional

People

(Reporter: alice0775, Unassigned)

References

Details

(Keywords: perf, regression, Whiteboard: [parity-Chrome])

Attachments

(1 file)

Attached file Bug1271947.txt
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1271947 +++ User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/50.0.2661.94 Safari/537.36 Steps to reproduce: 1. Open Browser Console, Web Console or Scratch Pad 2. Paste JavaScript code in the attached file 3. Evaluate the code Actual Results: Nightly49 is 9 times slower than Chrome. And Nightly49 is 2-3 times slower than Firefox38/31. Browser : Result Chrome50 : 851 838 840 Firefox31 : 2740 2813 2783 Firefox38 : 3077 3045 3030 Firefox39 : 4668 4675 4668 Firefox40 : 4318 4334 4246 Firefox41 : 4525 4457 4468 Firefox42 : 5875 5808 5816 Firefox43 : 6249 6076 6124 Firefox44 : 7159 6949 7008 Firefox45 : 6969 6930 6896 Firefox46 : 6727 6613 6658 Firefox47 : 7217 7050 7164 Firefox48 : 7721 7716 7703 Firefox49 : 7900 7888 7884 Expected results: No so Actual results: After Firefox updated from 44 to 45 version, we've got a problem that decryption process takes too long time (about 10 seconds) but under Firefox 44 and below it was about 1 second. Expected results: In Firefox 45 and above decryption process should take about 1 second.
> Actual results: > > After Firefox updated from 44 to 45 version, we've got a problem that decryption process takes > too long time (about 10 seconds) but under Firefox 44 and below it was about 1 second. > > > Expected results: > > In Firefox 45 and above decryption process should take about 1 second. Oops, paste error. Please ignore last 9 lines
Whiteboard: [parity-Chrome]
Tracking this regression for 49 as it seems to be a fairly significant performance regression. ni on bholley - Is this something you would look into or should it be passed on to someone else?
Flags: needinfo?(bobbyholley)
This looks like a dupe of Bug 793345. I'm not sure what the columns in Comment 0 are representing exactly, but the perf appears to be bouncing around 44-47 if the first column is a measure of time. The numbers do seem to get gradually worse over time, but even from the start it's 10x slower than the same code running in a script tag so fixing Bug 793345 looks like the most important piece here.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(bobbyholley)
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
This seems less of a sudden regression than something gradually getting worse since 38 or so. I don't think we need to track this.
Product: Firefox → DevTools
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: