Open
Bug 1280480
Opened 8 years ago
Updated 2 years ago
Parental Controls interactions from Extensions
Categories
(WebExtensions :: General, enhancement, P5)
WebExtensions
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
UNCONFIRMED
People
(Reporter: freaktechnik, Unassigned)
Details
(Whiteboard: [design-decision-approved][triaged][privacy])
An API to interact with the system's parental controls features (if any) would be useful. Things I'd expect from such an API would include to be able to - Query the current status of Parental Controls - Check if an action is allowed (like browsing a certain URL or downloading something etc.) The general enabled state is more important than being able to query for specific URLs. The main feature this would be useful for is when querying APIs for content and being able to honor the parental controls settings and limit the content displayed to the end user.
Reporter | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [design-decision-needed]
Updated•8 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [design-decision-needed] → [design-decision-needed] triaged
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•8 years ago
|
||
Being able to prompt for parental approval would also be useful for extensions, so certain actions aren't just blocked, but need approval.
Comment 2•8 years ago
|
||
I think the parental controls are maintained by the operating system, so presumably we'd need an OS specific implementation of this. Would the ability to call out through connectNative to the specific OS level services to query make sense? Is that possible?
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•8 years ago
|
||
Firefox already has a unified interface for it across operating systems, which can do quite a few things but I don't think every method is implemented even for just one operating system. I am not sure how easy it would be to use with Android, as I've never looked into parental controls for Android. On the desktop operating systems that would be possible, and I don't think the requirement of installing an additional binary is too bad, it would also allow for extensions to provide their own control types (which some APIs allow). However a basic check would still be quite handy, but I guess one could try to polyfill it by emulating a request with the Prefer: Safe header. I am also not sure if there are parental control settings that are Firefox-specific that an extension would want to respect - I've so far only used the enabled status and thought about using prompts for certain features.
Comment 4•8 years ago
|
||
Do you know where the API (and or docs is)? The fact there's a built in API for it, sorry I didn't know about that, makes it much easier to implement.
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•8 years ago
|
||
Its interface definition is in https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/components/parentalcontrols/nsIParentalControlsService.idl which is (as for many XPCOM APIs) the best doc I know of.
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•8 years ago
|
||
Oh, and the implementing component has the Contract ID "@mozilla.org/parental-controls-service;1".
Comment 7•7 years ago
|
||
Hi Martin! This has been added to the agenda for the April 4 WebExtensions Triage meeting at 10:30am PT. Will you be able to join us? Call in info: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Add-ons/Contribute/Triage#Details_.26_How_to_Join Agenda: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1V4NP4tWnjHigS2lAosCLfkU2FTcrQnoQzzXZmmB1uzk/edit#
Comment 8•7 years ago
|
||
This bug has been carried over to the April 17 WebExtensions Triage meeting. Agenda: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zKqhDqXoH9vi88q4DGtOHm1hsCF8ZwLNvCrrCE5htbc/edit# Martin, will you be able to join us tomorrow?
Comment 9•7 years ago
|
||
Martin, my mistake -- the meeting is on April 18, not April 17.
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•7 years ago
|
||
I'll try to, but I can't promise anything. If I don't make it: my plan is to eventually create an experiment for this implementing two features: a property to check if parental controls are enabled and a method to trigger a privilege elevation prompt. I'm not entirely sure how doable the second part is, but the first one should be quite trivial.
Comment 11•7 years ago
|
||
I didn't follow up on this for some reason sorry. The notes from the meeting (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zKqhDqXoH9vi88q4DGtOHm1hsCF8ZwLNvCrrCE5htbc/edit) says this was approved. But I'm struggling to remember more details than that.
Whiteboard: [design-decision-needed] triaged → [design-decision-approved] triaged
Updated•7 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P5
Reporter | ||
Comment 12•7 years ago
|
||
For reference: I started writing an experiment here: https://github.com/freaktechnik/parentalControls but haven't had resources to invest into it since. It probably doesn't work, as I've never tested it.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: Toolkit → WebExtensions
Comment 13•6 years ago
|
||
Bulk move of bugs per https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1483958
Component: Untriaged → General
Updated•6 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [design-decision-approved] triaged → [design-decision-approved][triaged][privacy]
Updated•2 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•