Closed Bug 128790 Opened 23 years ago Closed 23 years ago

not possible to have differerent typefaces for different charactersets

Categories

(Core :: Internationalization, defect)

Product:
Core
Component:
Internationalization
Platform:
x86
Linux
Type:
defect
Priority:
Not set
Severity:
minor

Tracking

()

Status:
VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 95227

People

(Reporter: u32858, Assigned: shanjian)

Details

(Keywords: intl)

From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8+) Gecko/20020227 BuildID: 2002022700 On a fresh install, i just noticed that the typeface is the same for every charset, this should be independent I think. some people might prefer this Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.to to Preferences ->appearance ->fonts 2.select Sans Serif, now change to unicode, 3.see that unicode is not set to sans serif as well, it applys to all it would seem Actual Results: One setting of sans serif or serif applys to every charset Expected Results: should be indenpendant
Severity: minor → enhancement
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Summary: not possible to have differerent typefaces for different charactersets → [RFE]not possible to have differerent typefaces for different charactersets
This is intl.
Assignee: sgehani → yokoyama
Severity: enhancement → minor
Component: Preferences → Internationalization
QA Contact: sairuh → ruixu
Summary: [RFE]not possible to have differerent typefaces for different charactersets → not possible to have differerent typefaces for different charactersets
Keywords: intl
QA Contact: ruixu → ylong
shajian; should sans serif and serif be independent?
Assignee: yokoyama → shanjian
Font default was never meant to be independent. But the UI seems suggesting that it is indepentent of lang group. We probably should change the UI design.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
this bug looks very similar to bug 95227. are they related by chance?
yep, it does look similar
Dup... The UI is currently lagging behind and not using the full strength of the back-end. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 95227 ***
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Verified as dup.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.