Closed Bug 129216 Opened 23 years ago Closed 19 years ago

Integrate Python xpcom bindings with build system

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: Build Config, enhancement)

enhancement
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: markh, Assigned: markh)

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 20 obsolete files)

11.03 KB, patch
benjamin
: review+
brendan
: superreview+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
I want to allow building of the python/xpcom directory a standard Moz extension, so it can be built without any source-file changes - just configure and go! Intend having Linux and win32 gmake builds using the standard ./configure procedure, while the win32 nmake build is likely to look for a special environment variable to trigger the build.
Comment on attachment 72748 [details] [diff] [review] Initial patch that adds support for ./configure to allow us to build. Since pyxpcom is an extensions, I'd prefer to use the standard extensions mechanism for it so that --enable-extensions=default,pyxpcom works. If we need to add the PYTHON_SRC check ontop of as well, we can do that by following the gtk/xmlterm example.
Attachment #72748 - Flags: needs-work+
Here is a new patch. It simply wants "--enable-extensions=extensions/pyxpcom" and it will attempt to locate Python and configure everything automatically - no need for PYTHON_SRC etc, it automatically locates everything! I have never written an autoconf script before, so comments appreciated.
Attachment #72748 - Attachment is obsolete: true
The build system seems to have some problems interpolating the MOZ_PYTHON_* variables. I'm running MDK8.2 (autoconf-2.13). If you look in extensions/python/xpcom/source: Makefile: DEPTH=../../../.. topsrcdir = ../../../.. srcdir = . PYTHON_INCLUDES = @MOZ_PYTHON_INCLUDES@ PYTHON_LIBS = @MOZ_PYTHON_LIBS@ PYTHON_DEBUG_SUFFIX = @MOZ_PYTHON_DEBUG_SUFFIX@ PYTHON_DLL_SUFFIX = @MOZ_PYTHON_DLL_SUFFIX@ Makefile.in: DEPTH=../../../.. topsrcdir = @top_srcdir@ srcdir = @srcdir@ VPATH = @srcdir@ PYTHON_INCLUDES = @MOZ_PYTHON_INCLUDES@ PYTHON_LIBS = @MOZ_PYTHON_LIBS@ PYTHON_DEBUG_SUFFIX = @MOZ_PYTHON_DEBUG_SUFFIX@ PYTHON_DLL_SUFFIX = @MOZ_PYTHON_DLL_SUFFIX@ autoconf obviously is beeing ran on the Makefile.in, but not for the @MOZ_PYTHON_* variables.
Re problems with MOZ_PYTHON_ variables. Is it possible that you simply need to run "autoconf" after patching configure.in? Maybe the new code isn't in "./configure"? [My understanding from #mozilla is that I only need to provide a patch for ./configure.in and magically a new ./configure will end up in CVS. Please correct me if I am wrong.]
I've ran autoconf, but it did not work. What I had to do was to delete the makefiles found in e*/python/xpcom/src and e*/python/xpcom/src/loader/, then the build system would insert the correct values for MOZ_PYTHON_*. I'm not sure why it does this, but now it works. Looking at the timestamp on the files I see that the Makefile.in files are older than the Makefile files. Perhaps a touch on them would do the same trick. You are correct regarding the autoconf magic.
I had a strange build problem that has gone away by using paths of the format "C:/foo" rather than "C:\foo" - someone, somewhere was obviously escaping.
Attachment #82152 - Attachment is obsolete: true
On windows, the autoconf stuff would destroy the makefiles on second pass if the python variables were defined in the makefiles. This moves those variables into autoconf.mk.in and allows for a successful build on win32. The test_misc.py passes everything, but have not done futher testing beyond that.
By "Destroy" I mean that AC_OUTPUT in configure used /cygwin/c/ paths for srcdir and top_srcdir. Since neither VS or ActivePerl understands those paths, build failed.
Comment on attachment 107653 [details] [diff] [review] diff to build against 1.2 release In the configure tests, isn't MOZ_PYTHON_SRC always going to be empty? So why bother with the test -z ?
Attachment #107653 - Flags: review-
Ahh, yes. I based my patch off the earlier patches, and did not catch that. I can create a new patch soon.
When patching the 1.2.1 source distro with the latest patch from this bug report, the detection of the 'python directories' doesn't work on my debian sarge system. It uses the MOZ_PYTHON_SRC (/usr/bin) as the base for the include and lib dirs, ie: $MOZ_PYTHON_SRC/lib ... however the directory is located at /usr/lib and not /usr/bin/lib. When I hardcode the location of the lib and include directories in the configure.in file, gmake -f client.mk build runs until ErrorUtils.cpp where it exits with the following error: gmake[5]: Entering directory `/home/remy/development/mozilla/extensions/python/xpcom/src' ErrorUtils.cpp c++ -o ErrorUtils.o -c -DOSTYPE=\"Linux2.4\" -DOSARCH=\"Linux\" -DOJI -I/usr/include/python2.1 -I../../../../dist/include/xpcom -I../../../../dist/include/string -I../../../../dist/include/pyxpcom -I../../../../dist/include -I/home/remy/development/mozilla/dist/include/nspr -I/usr/X11R6/include -fPIC -I/usr/X11R6/include -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -pedantic -Wno-long-long -pthread -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -I/usr/X11R6/include -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include ../../../../mozilla-config.h -Wp,-MD,.deps/ErrorUtils.pp ErrorUtils.cpp ErrorUtils.cpp: In function `void LogMessage(const char *, const char *)': ErrorUtils.cpp:40: `nsOutputConsoleStream' undeclared (first use this function) ErrorUtils.cpp:40: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ErrorUtils.cpp:40: for each function it appears in.) ErrorUtils.cpp:40: parse error before `;' ErrorUtils.cpp:41: `console' undeclared (first use this function) ErrorUtils.cpp: In function `void PyXPCOM_LogError(const char *, ...)': ErrorUtils.cpp:65: `nsOutputStringStream' undeclared (first use this function) ErrorUtils.cpp:65: parse error before `(' ErrorUtils.cpp:70: `streamout' undeclared (first use this function) Could it be that this error has something to do with a missing or incorrect path?
Building XPCOM/pyXPCOM from CVS works if the /usr/lib /usr/include is hardcoded.
Attached patch New for 1.4, and updated (obsolete) — Splinter Review
This version should work much better, and integrates other patches as well as I can. For both Windows and Linux it should build from either a "pre-installed" Python, or a built source-tree. For both platforms, setting PYTHON_SRC before configuring should configure for the Python in that directory, otherwise your path will be searched and that Python used. (You may need to delete config.cache after changing this var) Tested fully on Windows. On my RH8 system, it configures and builds out-of-the-box using the RH supplied Python. pyloader link fails however - I have to give up now, but help for Linux would be lovely!
Attachment #86370 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #107653 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #112270 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attached patch New patch (obsolete) — Splinter Review
This patch is a lot simpler. This patch no longer uses PYTHON_SRC, but instead borrows conventions from other Python based autoconf tools. You may specify $PYTHON, which must be the Python executable (or your PATH is searched for any python). This Python's sys.prefix is used as the base directory. Thus, a source directory is no longer supported on Linux - you must do a "make install" on your Python tree (or use a pre-built/pre-installed one). The good news is that this actually builds and works on Linux :) If you use Python 2.3, configure with "--enable-shared", do a "make install", set LD_LIBRARY_PATH and PYTHON_PATH appropriately, you can convince it to work!
Attachment #119062 - Attachment is obsolete: true
This is a patch I used to build PyXPCOM with Mozilla 1.5. The previous patch didn't work for me. The only differences between this patch and the previous one are in the line numbers. Don't forget to run autoconf before configuring. Under Linux I had to prevent binding with the static Python library by temporarily renaming that library. If bound with the static library I got a "Fatal Python error: Interpreter not initialized (version mismatch?)". Under Windows I had to manually add PYTHON_INCLUDES and PYTHON_LIBS to src/Makefile and src/loader/Makefile.
Attached patch Fresh patch off the trunk (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #120574 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #138830 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
I have been working on getting pyxpcom going on linux with firefox >= 1.0.3. I know others want to get it working too. We should get together somehow. I've made freenode channel #pyxpcom for collaboration purposes. The Mozilla 1.7 branch compiles pyxpcom ok but when running against firefox has a few segfaults (maybe just the way I'm using it). Any discussion/feedback appreciated.
Attached patch Patch off 1.0.4 branch (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Don't know if this obsoletes the trunk patch...
this patch allows pyxpcom to be built when building a static firefox build. Tested with 1.0.4 on osx
Attached patch pyxpcom build patch for osx (obsolete) — Splinter Review
this is the patch we use at ActiveState to build pyxpcom on win/linux and os x. If you are doing static builds, get the previous patch I added also.
Attached patch updated configure + build patch (obsolete) — Splinter Review
This patch: - adds the configure checks from attachment 153029 [details] [diff] [review] - adds necessary MOZ_INTERNAL_API=1 to Makefile.in:s so you can actually build on trunk (this part is just necessary, not sufficient to build on trunk) - fixes the Makefile.in:s install targets to work with objdir != srcdir builds, - adds install targets to actually install the python package
Attachment #153029 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #186136 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment on attachment 186149 [details] [diff] [review] updated configure + build patch Asking for review.
Attachment #186149 - Flags: review?(benjamin)
Comment on attachment 186149 [details] [diff] [review] updated configure + build patch r- for only one thing: please use "cygpath -t mixed" instead of "cygpath -m" because some older versions of cygpath don't understand -m. But, I would really like to avoid the *.py rule in extensions/python/xpcom/Makefile.in; could the list of .py files be coded in variables such as PYSRCS_XPCOM PYSRCS_XPCOMCLIENT PYSRCS_XPCOMSERVER PYSRCS_XPCOMTOOLS And then use these variables instead of *.py?
Attachment #186149 - Flags: review?(benjamin) → review-
I changed the cygpath argument as requested, and changed the *.py rules to use variables instead. The patch also includes one file I forgot to diff in the old patch, config/system-headers, where I added Python.h to the list of wrapped system headers.
Assignee: mhammond → chpe
Attachment #186149 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #186523 - Flags: review?(benjamin)
Attachment #186523 - Flags: review?(benjamin)
Attachment #186523 - Flags: review+
Attachment #186523 - Flags: approval-aviary1.1a2+
attachment 186523 [details] [diff] [review] checked in. Checking in allmakefiles.sh; /cvsroot/mozilla/allmakefiles.sh,v <-- allmakefiles.sh new revision: 1.566; previous revision: 1.565 done Checking in configure.in; /cvsroot/mozilla/configure.in,v <-- configure.in new revision: 1.1469; previous revision: 1.1468 done Checking in config/autoconf.mk.in; /cvsroot/mozilla/config/autoconf.mk.in,v <-- autoconf.mk.in new revision: 3.349; previous revision: 3.348 done Checking in config/system-headers; /cvsroot/mozilla/config/system-headers,v <-- system-headers new revision: 3.4; previous revision: 3.3 done Checking in extensions/python/xpcom/Makefile.in; /cvsroot/mozilla/extensions/python/xpcom/Makefile.in,v <-- Makefile.in new revision: 1.2; previous revision: 1.1 done Checking in extensions/python/xpcom/src/Makefile.in; /cvsroot/mozilla/extensions/python/xpcom/src/Makefile.in,v <-- Makefile.in new revision: 1.5; previous revision: 1.4 done Checking in extensions/python/xpcom/src/loader/Makefile.in; /cvsroot/mozilla/extensions/python/xpcom/src/loader/Makefile.in,v <-- Makefile.in new revision: 1.7; previous revision: 1.6 done Checking in extensions/python/xpcom/test/test_component/Makefile.in; /cvsroot/mozilla/extensions/python/xpcom/test/test_component/Makefile.in,v <-- Makefile.in new revision: 1.2; previous revision: 1.1 done
I still had problems compiling the current version of pyxpcom in CVS. It couldn't find NS_GetGlobalComponentManager (defined in nsComponentManagerObsolete.h, which was apparently removed from CVS?). I ended up taking some of the changes from the second patch listed on http://live.gnome.org/Epiphany_2fEphyPython_2fPyXPCOM (just the componentmanager changes, not the unicode changes), and can now successfully compile pyxpcom. I'm attaching a patch of the changes I applied.
(In reply to comment #29) > Created an attachment (id=186767) [edit] > fix to remove references to ns_getglobalcomponentmanager Note, that issue is addressed by https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=297598 I think this bug can be resolved.
I dont think this is ready to be resolved until I/someone can integrate the various build patches. The latest build patch allows linking against a static lib on linux, which is a failure case, and the osx build patch I posted needs to be integrated with it.
Comment on attachment 186767 [details] [diff] [review] fix to remove references to ns_getglobalcomponentmanager Should this patch should be rolled up with bug 297598? Maybe to keep things cleaner, this bug should deal only with the Mozilla build system, not pyxpcom itself.
The original attachment 186139 [details] [diff] [review] duplicated many of the patches already checked into CVS. Best I could tell, there are only 2 patches that are not duplicated: * Detection of lib and header files on non-windows. * The EXTRA_DSO_OPTS patch in config/rules.mk The EXTRA_DSO_OPTS patch appears to be unnecessary. As the pyxpcom makefiles set IS_COMPONENT, that platform should already get a "-bundle" option. So attached is a new patch that only changes the non-windows branch in configure.in. Note I have *NOT* tested this as my Linux dev environment hasn't caught up with pyxpcom yet. Requesting review from Shane after testing on the various platforms he builds with.
Attachment #186139 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #191157 - Flags: review?(shanec)
at oscon now, can try out the changes in a couple weeks. The rules.mk part of my patch prevented another part of the IS_COMPONENT build options from being used. I dont remember the specifics of why I needed that, I'll look into that also.
The rules.mk change is necessary to get the pyxpcom shared libs to load correctly. This might be able to be handled in the pyxpcom makefiles, but I already had the rules.mk patch handy. This is against the 1.8 branch.
Comment on attachment 193733 [details] [diff] [review] marks last patch fixed for osx and linux This is the sort of this we really don't want to be hardcoding into rules.mk. Please add -bundle to the pyxpcom makefiles as necessary, if these are really bundles but are not components (which sounds odd to me).
Attachment #193733 - Flags: review-
Ok, this patch gets rid of using rules.mk, and patches the makefile in pyxpcom to build the python module correctly.
(In reply to comment #36) > (From update of attachment 193733 [details] [diff] [review] [edit]) > This is the sort of this we really don't want to be hardcoding into rules.mk. > Please add -bundle to the pyxpcom makefiles as necessary, if these are really > bundles but are not components (which sounds odd to me). > _xpcom.dylib is a python extension, not a mozilla component. libpyloader.dylib is the mozilla component that loads python. IS_COMPONENT adds something else into the mix which makes python unable to import _xpcom.dylib. Only the makefile for _xpcom.dylib needs the work around.
Attachment #193960 - Flags: review?(benjamin)
Attachment #193960 - Flags: review?(benjamin) → review+
This patch fixes building trunk cvs on os x.
Attachment #209394 - Flags: review?(mark)
Attachment #209394 - Flags: review?(mark) → review?(mhammond)
That osx patch is now applied. As far as I know, no outstanding patches remain. I will leave this bug open though to track even better build integration after discussing it with the moz guys etc (eg, should configure automatically check for a usable Python and automatically enable things?)
Comment on attachment 191157 [details] [diff] [review] updated pyxpcom build patch for non-windows I had a quick try to this on linux, 1_8 branch. It doesnt seem to work. Where is MOZ_PYTHON_SRC defined? Or should that actually be MOZ_PYTHON_PREFIX?
Comment on attachment 191157 [details] [diff] [review] updated pyxpcom build patch for non-windows Oh nm, this was fixed and checked in as part of attachment 193960 [details] [diff] [review]
(In reply to comment #40) > That osx patch is now applied. As far as I know, no outstanding patches > remain. I will leave this bug open though to track even better build > integration after discussing it with the moz guys etc (eg, should configure > automatically check for a usable Python and automatically enable things?) > The file mozilla/extensions/python/xpcom/src/Makefile.in does not have the patch any more. I think the problem is that the file mozilla/extensions/python/xpcom/src/module/Makefile.in was removed, and with it the patch. I am using the branch 1_8
Enhance python/Mozilla building. From the change to configure.in: dnl Two ways to enable Python support: dnl --enable-extensions=python # select all available. dnl (MOZ_PYTHON_EXTENSIONS contains the list of extensions) dnl or: dnl --enable-extensions=python/xpcom,... # select individual ones This means that the builder can --enable-extensions=python, and automatically all Python extensions will be built. Although the trunk currently only has 1 extension (xpcom), the DOM_AGNOSTIC work is introducing a new one. Once that branch lands, it will be a one-line change to have it included in the default Python extensions. It introduces a new variable MOZ_PYTHON_EXTENSIONS, and a new extensions/python/Makefile.in. This patch also renames PYTHON_* to MOZ_PYTHON_* in all makefiles, consistent with all other MOZ build variables.
Assignee: chpe → mhammond
Attachment #186062 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #186523 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #186524 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #186767 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #191157 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #193733 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #193960 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #209394 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #211961 - Flags: review?(benjamin)
Attachment #209394 - Flags: review?(mhammond)
Attachment #191157 - Flags: review?(shanec)
Attachment #211961 - Flags: review?(benjamin) → review+
Attachment #211961 - Flags: superreview?(brendan)
Comment on attachment 211961 [details] [diff] [review] patch allowing --enable-extensions=python Rubberstamping -- main thing is that it works for you and it doesn't turn any tinderboxes red. /be
Attachment #211961 - Flags: superreview?(brendan) → superreview+
All checked in - finally retiring this bug! Thanks all
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: